Nameless

27 May 2017 03:24 pm
matrixmann: (Black suits comin')
Zbigniew Brzeziński

(insert "Straight to hell"-jingle of your own choice here)
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
"The land of the free never really cared about freedom. Not its politicians, not its oligarchs, not the people that really decide over the course of the country. It worked together with Nazis barely that they've fled from Europe just to bring down the Soviet Union because they were its political enemies. The United States - a Jew-friendly place? Open your eyes, by the time the Germans killed them by the masses in their concentration camps, nobody liked them anywhere either. Henry Ford was an anti-Semite, Disney was an anti-Semite - nobody thought about correcting their views or putting them to jail for it. Ford even had good trade relations with the Third Reich as long as it was possible. IBM delivered punch card machines for the bureaucratic administration of the concentration camps. If the United States really would have been so much against it, they had ordered those key technologies to be stopped to be delivered to the Nazis before they made the declaration of war. It would have just been a blow to them. Key technologies are always subject to the final OK of the state. If it doesn't happen, the administration doesn't want it. And the trail keeps continuing until the present. Fascists and butchers? As long as they're political enemies of an enemy of the states, they don't see reason why not making them their tool for a power change or to simply destroy the most promising competitor beside them.
One can't even tell how long in time this behavior goes back. It's been so much inherent to its system, it's like it goes back to the very early days - since the US was able to move on the international political parquet."
matrixmann: (Waiting for command)
What is there to say?
This is the world you created.
This is the seeds you have sown.
And this is the harvest you get.
Say - are you fucking happy with it?!
Are you happy that any grand nation
can attack another nation,
without being subject to punishment?
Are you happy with crying over people
that you didn't know they existed
until yesterday?
Is this your understanding of
humanism?
Selectable like your joys -
and after a few weeks gone
you have forgotten about everything.
This is your standard.
Scapegoats and heroes
and "Iiiii have nothing to do with that".

Original:
https://matrixmann.dreamwidth.org/129999.html
matrixmann: (Default)
The US entered a war on the legitimate state of Syria they know they can't win.
Why would they otherwise just throw missiles over to an airbase "to change a govenments behavior", when they could have just more than that?
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
The country all look up to: Health insurance and still you've got to pay yourself for your doctors, DocMobil to travel the rural lands like Doctors Without Borders in crisis areas, millions dependent on food stamps, family structures like in third world countries - get many kids to rise the probability that one will be able to care for you when you grow old or sick; don't break with wealthy relatives of yours as they can offer you financial help or a roof above your head -, and working your ass off 'til old age 'til you die 'cause pension doesn't exist, no matter the state of your health.
This is the country that people worldwide crave to live in, citing its huge freedoms and doing whatever you want what you can't do in your home country. This is the country that people brag they can find their fortune in and unbelievable riches, like it's still the 18th or 19th century.
matrixmann: (Black suits comin')
In Lower Saxony, a chief physician in gynecology is able to openly state "I don't do abortions anymore" and reason his decision with his Christian belief, and the chief of the clinic is able to express his support for the doctor, stating "There is no law in Germany that can force a doctor to do an abortion. Unless her life is in danger and there is a medical indication to do it.".

Repeat: In 21st century Germany, a gynecologist is able to state "I don't do abortions anymore" - and gets away with it! Where is the big #aufschrei here? Where are the women rights activists here to scream and shout about it?!
I don't even hear a fucking court or a stupid talkshow screaming "Now that doesn't suit out values and definitions of freedom..." and speak about unlawfulness!
Where are you fucking human rights activists here?! Where are you social justice warriors here to cry about it!! I know, you get paid to shut the fuck up about it when religion is involved in such shitty decisions because religion has become so superimportant in this century!

Thank you, people! Thank you for importing this American shit and let religion rule once again over peoples' lives after they have made it to wrest it from state and church to get everyone the same treatment regardless of who they pray to!

If you let one have his way, all the others crawl from under the rock again too!

Don't you fucking dare to complain about the image of a family that the far right comes up with anymore again... You're fucking far right too if you let such things happen!
matrixmann: (Thinking)
First, there were fights over religion, then it was political ideologies, now it's about which food to eat.
Mankind really is bored like an overdeveloped ape with too much free time on his hands, isn't it?
matrixmann: (Thinking)
What would somebody say who died 10 years ago about the fuss that takes place today?
In politics as well as society as well as technology - how things in general developed during the last decade?
Would he think "the better that I have died, that's even worse than when I was still alive"?
Or would he say "I should have stayed, just to try to make a change in all these things"?
What about somebody who killed himself?
Would he be happy about his deed?
Would he scream in horror how the world has become, compared to 10 years ago?
What would his words be about Facebook, about streaming, about the current state the world is in - the economical crisis, the West's fight with Russia, the war in Syria, Libya, newly grown information sources that didn't exist back then?
Also, what would he say about culture, about current trends? About the rise of German Schlager, the dropping in the background of Hiphop, the rise of softened Electro House and the current remake mania in Hollywood?
What would he say if he heard that now it's a trend for the lost youth to travel to the Middle East and play "Call Of Duty" for real - voluntarily?

Sometimes it would be better if someone was alive again who didn't follow all these developments, just to give you a more distanced opinion, free from the political correctness of today, free from the frames and shapes which society and public likes to think in during current times.
Having been gone opens a door to potentially give you new ideas. Ideas you wouldn't have if you talked to somebody who's a child of his time and narrow-minded as the current episode is.
Too long ago may become a problem as the changes over 20 and 30 years or more are too huge for someone to comprehend in a small amount of time. There would be the danger of becoming overwhelmed by impressions.
Many things changed in a longer episode of time.

But even during the last 10 years, you have some things which totally took a major development, while you have others where you would say "business as usual". Nothing has changed.
The stupification of mankind hasn't stopped, quite the opposite, it has increased. Through the invention of smartphones and social media shifting from a text-based to a photo- and video-based issue. Bullying and mobbing hasn't vanished from the face of the earth, its results only have become quieter and no-one talks about it anymore loudly. Children themselves don't take a gun into their hands anymore nessecarily to make it known.
Adults don't have more time for their offspring, they even whip themselves some more and force themselves onto their place of work.
Poverty didn't disappear. And the rich have even grown richer than they used to be.
The only thing that maybe has become different, making an interesting change in the pack of cards, that keeping secrets has become more critical for the states. Not only is it more of an importance for them to survive than before, but also the means to do it need to scatter because it is more likely that somebody might get something out and show it to the public. Not all people entrusted with confidential information still agree on or are convinced of keeping their secrets anymore.
Also, there has grown an echo chamber which specialized in picking these things up and spread it as their own propaganda, just like you're used to it from the notorious usual suspects.
This changes the game of what to believe and what not to believe.

Someone who died earlier and was sick of this system might find its joy with the new circumstances...
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
As a pick-up of this: https://matrixmann.dreamwidth.org/28590.html

People talk a lot about their alleged individuality, but when you go through the interests displayed by their social media profiles - and there cannot be made the suspicion they only enter it for distracting other people from guessing their could be something important to get from them -, you come across the same kind of contents over and over again. Privately in real life, it's barely different.
During these years, movies are not the big players in the game, music had been so for a longer amount of time and is no more - due to the various possibilities to go for what they call "your thing" -, literature is something that still passes some people, so TV series are the bigger craze; that's also due to cinema being repetitive and bringing up no new ideas during this episode, doing remakes of everything and nothing they ever created in Hollywood.
And what is the case? Everywhere you go, each country which you come across, people seem to name the same things over and over again as the things they like and the things they are interested in. Nothing against quality, but these days you cannot spare but regarding all of that under some kind of forced political agenda. Eventually - why is everyone excited about content exceptionally mostly produced in the US?
Why do people eat each and every shit of a TV series coming from America?
The biggest gimmicks these days are turning 12 Monkeys into a TV series and the Scream movies! Like they haven't been good enough as they were made!
And people even get excited about content that newly filmed shit! Like they didn't know what originally was supposed to happen!
Why do people worldwide know nothing more than to watch Game Of Thrones, The Big Bang Theory, The Walking Dead, Dexter, Hannibal, Person Of Interest, The Blacklist, Black Sails, Sons Of Anarchy, Breaking Bad - a few years earlier: Teen Wolf, Vampire Diaries, True Blood, Glee, CSI: Miami (and its offsprings from other cities), Navy CIS, Hannah Montana, Taken; even earlier: Emergency Room, Grey's Anatomy, Scrubs, Dr. House, Lost, Desperate Housewifes, Sex And The City, King Of Queens, Gilmore Girls - Sabrina the Teenage Witch, Buffy and so on?!
Are people that stupid or easy to impress that American filming industry always finds an easy way to push their buttons?!
The type of that people which watched all this shit as it was current are those kind to have a habit to tell all tell all Manga / Anime freaks that it's all the same which they consume as an entertainment - that they consume anything that comes from Japan in comics, cartoon movies and video games -, but they themselves are none of the better, only with a different focus of attention!!
Brainwashed and Americanized!
And by that kind of people you wanna be taught a lesson about "being individual" and thinking yourself?
They are as individual as a stencil! They can think from the West side to the East side of the road!
They don't even take notice how much they are like their neighbor!
At the latest since Ikea has become the main sponsor of furniture for lots of apartments, they don't even notice how much even their living room looks like the one of the neighbor!
And those rave the most about being individual, being special and being one in a million that needs to be cried for when they die!
You know what? If you wanna get an opinion about mankind, just fucking look at this targeted remote control and see for yourself!
All fucking caged full purses imagening they're someone and they live in wide open lands.
matrixmann: (Wasteland Ranger)
2011: Spliting of Sudan.
matrixmann: (Black suits comin')
One just can't deny that it seems like political discussions more and more drift towards the niveau that is common in the US and that it more and more is about seeing races, sexes, sexual preferences and the discrimination of such.
Like - a white average person that identifies with its born gender is not entitled to critisize a dark-colored person or a person with roots from Turkey, even though it has its justification because the person itself behaves inappropriate and it has nothing to do with him being the phenotype that he is.
First that person is black (or orange or yellow or blue like a smurf), second he is human.
And because he is black, no white Central European person is entitled to say anything bad about him because first that would be discrimination. Just because of something nobody is to blame for, which you can't pick when you are created.
Especially that emerges currently in the refugee debate.
But if another issue is the topic, it is the same.
Suddenly there is dicrimination against women or against sexual minorities and the public gets worked up over another matter. Like there are no other problems to complain about or it always can be reduced to this. That's the ultimate reason why nothing works.
People complain about their own poverty because of discrimination, not because the system dropped them.
And, like a planned campaign against something, if wanting to get excited, they pick out only the worst examples for public debates which you can really certify xenophobia, sexism and discrimination against certain religions.
Acting through presenting, like this is the only kind of person critical of a thing that exists.
There is only black and white, nothing in between. You can recognize a sexist by the shape of his nose.
All mantras that progressivism ever preached about not generalizing, projecting an assumption onto a mass of people blanket, they disobey themselves massively if it suits their wishes. They don't see single persons, they also only see masses standing against them. Let alone if they find someone's statements inappropriate according to their mindset, then he's as outlawed for defamations and reputational damage as a serious felon...
matrixmann: (Wasteland Ranger)
2003: George W. Bush, Tony Blair and other associates go on a search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but fail to find them and others even still today don't manage to detect their whereabouts.
They find a head of state trapped in a clink, leave him to the verdict of the locals, pull down a statue and unjustifiably declare themselves to be the winner of the war - whose results still keep them busy for the sake of security.
matrixmann: (Wasteland Ranger)
2011: The beginning of something in Syria that didn't end in an upheaval like the Arab spring, but resulted in a full-fledged armed war.
matrixmann: (Waiting for command)
"Wer vergisst, dass seine Faust einen Menschen töten kann, der läuft Gefahr, seine eigene Zerstörungskraft zu unterschätzen.
Schutz ist nicht immer die angebrachteste Methode, um für Frieden zu sorgen.
Manche Menschen wollen gern Krieg führen.
Manche Menschen wollen den anderen gern beneiden.
Manche Menschen wollen auch einfach nur ihre Ruhe haben.

Vergesslichkeit gegenüber der Gewalt bewirkt irgendwann, dass man schnell zu ihr greift, weil man sie als nicht allzu drastisch erachtet."

https://matrixmann.dreamwidth.org/12154.html


Um ein altes, vor langer Zeit einmal erwähntes Thema zu besprechen und eventuell sogar zu erweitern: Damals noch allein auf die deutsche Problematik bezogen, ergibt sich, wenn man versucht, sich ein Bild von verschiedenen internationalen liberalen Bewegungen zu machen, und den gesellschaftlichen und kulturellen Einfluss, den diese bereits auf die allgemeine Lebensart gehabt haben, eine sehr ähnliche Konstellation.
Man könnte sogar schon verschwörerisch davon sprechen, sie hätten alle einen gemeinsamen geografischen Ursprung.
In, so ziemlich, allen westlichen Staaten ist das Thema Gewalt mit einem Tabu belegt und es wird in die Ecke unliebsamen Verhaltens geschoben.
Moralisch ist daran nichts verwerfliches auszusetzen - wohin käme man, wenn es kollektiv toleriert wäre, sich regelmäßig gegenseitig zu verprügeln und abzustechen?
Was allerdings in den Hintergrund gerät - und was einem mehr oder minder energisch von den liberalen Protestbewegungen versucht wird anderweitig weis zu machen -, ist die Tatsache, das Gewalt Bestandteil der Essenz des Lebens ist. Jegliche Form des Überlebens birgt einen Akt der Gewalt in sich, ob es nun ein Pflanze ist, die man tötet oder isst, oder ob es ein anderes Tier ist, welches man isst, um selbst weiter zu leben.
Die gesellschaftlichen Bewegungen, die in den letzten 50 Jahren die Bühne betreten haben, versuchen, diese Tatsache anzuzweifeln und den Menschen, die sie beeinflussen wollen, ebenso gleiches zu erzählen. Gewalt ist in ihren Augen höchst verdammungswürdig, obwohl es nicht immer die Möglichkeit in der Natur als auch im gesellschaftlichen Zusammenleben gibt, darum herumzukommen.
Ein weiteres, was diese Bewegungen verkennen - wenn der Mensch im Begriff ist, aufzuwachsen, muss er dennoch lernen, zu welcher körperlichen und zu welcher Zerstörungskraft er fähig ist. Wenn dies nicht in seinem Erfahrungsschatz vorhanden ist, und somit auch nicht in seinem geistigen gegenwärtigen Bewusstsein, so wird er in diesem Punkt maßlos werden.
Er lernt nicht, dass ein Tritt gegen den Kopf tödlich ist, oder wenigstens schwerwiegende lebenslange Schädigungen hervorrufen kann.
Analog dazu, lernt er auch nicht, diese Kraft im Zaum zu halten und sie lediglich dann anzuwenden, wenn alle anderen Handlungsoptionen nicht den gewünschten Effekt bewirken und, wenn er selbst angegriffen wird, wie viel Zuschlagen noch alleinige Notwehr ist und wo es bereits beginnt, dass er seinen Angreifer unfreiwillig tötet.

Ein weiteres, das dieses Tabu bringt, ist für diejenigen, die bereits mit übermäßig vieler Gewalt konfrontiert wurden und die nicht die typische Opferposition einnehmen.
Wer enthemmter ist, oder mental dadurch duldsamer gegenüber Szenarien und Schilderungen anderer ist, gilt sehr schnell als barbarisch und als gewaltverherrlichend. Obwohl er vielleicht nur einen Umstand aus dem Leben zitiert, der unbestritten mechanisch so abläuft und nicht änderbar ist.
Der Verdacht, dass so jemand einen Hang zu eigener Täterschaft hat ist ebenso begründet wie auch hysterisch. Zumal es verkennt auch die Situationen im gewöhnlichen Leben, in denen friedliche Mittel nicht die Antwort bringen, und in denen solcherlei geringere Hemmung eventuell sogar von praktischem Nutzen ist (z. B. Personenschutz und "Zivilcourage").

Eine vielleicht sogar noch schlimmere Sache, die diese Verdammung von Gewalt aus der eigenen Existenz mit sich bringt, ist aber die folgende:
Wenn Menschen es nur noch gewohnt sind, in einer für sie bedrohungsfreien oder wenigstens bedrohungsarmen Umgebung zu leben, dann wird sie das erste Durchbrechen dieser wohl behüteten Welt in ein Trauma versetzen.
Es wird ihnen so fremd sein, dass es ihnen unnatürlich vorkommt. Wie etwas, dass im Großen und Ganzen, das sich "Leben" nennt, eigentlich nicht vorzukommen hat. (Vergleiche: )
Solche Erscheinungen sind z. B. in der modernen Gesellschaft, es als barbarisch zu empfinden, Tiere schlachten zu müssen, um sie zu essen, während es vor nicht einmal 100 Jahren zwar als nicht angenehm, aber durchaus als eine notwendige als auch in der Gesellschaft vorkommende Sache angesehen wurde. Die stetige Ernährungssituation vor der großangelegten industriellen Verarbeitung und Herstellung von Lebensmitteln zwang einfach dazu. (Man war froh, in der Woche in Stück Fleisch essen zu können.)
Selbiges gilt auch für das Verständnis von Zusammenleben in der Gesellschaft als auch für das Beeinflussen von Gesellschaft, Staat und Politik.
Ein in der Moderne aufgewachsener Mensch, der von all den Agendas, die diese gesellschaftlichen Gruppen in das tägliche Bewusstsein haben einfließen lassen, bereits in seinen Grundfesten beeinflusst ist, tut sich schwer damit, zu realisieren, dass die Mächtigen seinen friedlichen Protest ignorieren, indem, dass sie den Vorhang zuziehen.
Er tut sich ebenso schwer damit, wenn er denn den gedanklichen Bogen zu Taten statt bunten Schildern findet, ein Maß zu finden statt nur sinnlose Zerstörung walten zu lassen.
Es muss dann nicht mehr nur Gewalt gegen einen Beamten sein, der ihn zu Unrecht schlägt, sondern auch angezündete Mülltonen, ausgeraubte Geschäfte und zerschlagene parkende Autos.
Ihn darauf hinzuweisen, ist dann für ihn gleichweitig damit, als wenn man jemandem Appetit macht und ihm dann aus einem 5-Gänge-Menü nur die Vorspeise vorsetzt.

So etwas passiert aber, wenn man es jemandem verwehrt, seine eigene Zerstörungskraft zu erkunden, wenn er in einem Alter ist, wo diese Zerstörung noch überschaubare Ausmaße annehmen kann ( = als Kind).
Wenn man Gewalt zu etwas unnatürlichem verdammt und versucht, es aus dem Kontext des menschlichen Zusammenlebens zu entfernen.

Es dient keinesfalls dem Schutz oder dem Befürworten von asozialem, schädigendem Verhalten, es dient vielmehr dem Erläutern, was passiert, wenn es Menschen regelrecht verboten wird, sich zu raufen, oder sich gegen Angreifer, die diesem Tabu nicht folgen, zu wehren.
Menschen, denen ihr Selbsterhaltungstrieb ausgetrieben wurde, sind so hilflos und schutzlos wie Neugeborene. Man muss sich ständig um sie kümmern, sie bleiben abhängig von dem Gutdünken von anderen und werden niemals fähig, ein vollständig eigentständiges Leben zu führen.
Menschen, die außerdem keine Widrigkeiten aushalten können, die ihnen das Leben von Natur aus beschweren kann, sind zu empfindlich um lang auf dieser Welt zu überleben - obendrein werden sie relativ unfähig sein, Kinder großzuziehen, die natürliche Widrigkeiten oder überhaupt ihr eigenes Temperament aushalten können.
Außerdem wird es zu einer Gesellschaft führen, in der alle, die dieses Gewalttabu nicht beachten, dem Rest der Gemeinde, die lediglich in Frieden leben wollen, ihren Terror aufzwingen können.

Dass man Opfern von körperlicher und sonstigen Formen von Gewalt Verständnis und Nachsicht gegenüber entgegen bringt, ist verständlich, bis zu einem gewissen Punkt sogar verantwortlich.
Wenn jemand nach Jahren aber immer noch nicht über eine Sache hinweg ist, so muss man das Zugeständnis machen "es können nicht alle ewig dieses Thema ausblenden und darauf achten, nichts unangenehmes bei dir hervorzurufen - wenn sich jemand an Sexualität stört, wird auch niemand für ihn die Plakate abmachen und die ganze Werbebranche umkrempeln; er wird gezwungen sein, weg- oder einfach hindurchzusehen".

Aus der östlichen Hemispähre ist dieser tabuisierte Umgang mit Gewalt weniger bekannt. Vielleicht, weil die Einsicht in die tatsächliche Notwendigkeit dort traditionell eine andere ist.


Falls jemand diesen Text als Aufruf zu Gewalt und zu Straftaten ansehen sollte, so betrachte ich dies als Verleumdung. Vielleicht ist es eine Spur gewaltverherrlichend, wenn "gewaltverherrlichend" bedeutet, dass man keine Scheu davor besitzt, sich auch mit diesem Thema ernsthaft auseinander zu setzen und nicht nur den Leitlinien einiger von Übersee inspirierten Lobbys gedankenlos zu folgen. Dafür sind aber auch die Markierungen "graphic (18+)" und "controversial" in den Tags angeheftet.
matrixmann: (Wasteland Ranger)
February 2011: 17th, marks of the official day when the uprising against the Colonel from Libya that always opened his wallet when Africa needed financial aid started.
His enemies, who spent a long time of friendship with him, still suffer from the results of their deed: Free influx of refugees and soldiers of fortune from Africa as well as the Middle East, other powers taking control of the area, and the oil, a steady flow settled by contract, now is next to be lost.
The outcome of this is still uncertain.
matrixmann: (Waiting for command)
Change to the concept needs to be laid down in time, otherwise it might be possible that time overtakes and it will be too late.
Many empires didn't recognize that point, even fought back against it. Who says that this cannot happen again? Who says everything that is known today still will be known in a hundred years? Who says that breakdowns which happen every few centuries cannot happen today anymore?
Who says that all people involved are that smart to avoid that?
There was a time where European countries fought against each other and longed for superior power in the the continent. The European project that is known today which finds its roots after WWII is a stark contradiction to that behavior. Who says they can't fall back to that through certain disputes that couldn't be agreed on a solution?
Who says that a country with a history only up to 250 years old, not counting the several inner disputes in between, could not suddenly break apart?
Who would have thought that affinities that lasted for hundreds of years suddenly would end in growing enmity only because of interferences of external powers that barely know anything about the history of that places?
Can someone really predict what'll happen to the world as you know it these days?
Nothing of that is written. Everything stays in a dynamic, and the more people exist the more the spiral of conflicts and changes seems to spin faster into a development that its original creators didn't mean to come so soon that they could still experience it.
They try to think that they can build a kingdom that outlasts at least their lifetime so they can build a nice existence garnished with privileges and securities that guarantee them a living in the lap of luxury.
But they underestimate the driving force behind their luxury and what it brings to all other people which can't live by that standard.
The misery they generate with their way of living and the disagreements these oligarchs even have among themselves creates the atmosphere of hate, turmoil, which creeps closer to end their existence.
If they like to stay caught up in this collision on interests, try to sit it out, it will be hate they sowed themselves which will overwhelm them - once more, like the immobility struck down the former enemies of these interest groups.
matrixmann: (Waiting for command)
Watch the world go down...
You won't know when the next revolution knocks on the door. You won't know when the next big change in the world is pending and stands on the brink of claiming what it wants.
You'll only notice when you're in the middle of it.
matrixmann: (Wasteland Ranger)
"The storms of fate cause misery for many, and few will be able to calm them once they start."

Leknaat, Suikoden II

matrixmann: (Wasteland Ranger)
On the occasion of another climate summit: If you wanna do nature a real favor, mankind needs to stop living like a lord and draw on unlimited resources - and not just China, India and all those countries which now start to develop to the standard of the so-called "first world countries".
They also need to stop in the West to regard it as a self-evidence to use and throw away, to regard it as a justified measure to invent new things, cut out the old ones and produce the new ones like there is no end only because they can't reach new economic growth with producing the old equipment, and to produce worse things like energy saving lamps instead of regular bulbs made of glass, plate and tungsten only because some lobbyist with no specialized knowledge says they're environmentally more acceptable.
Above all, as radical and evil as it seems, mankind needs to put on serious thought to the fact that their wasteful lifestyle isn't able to be reached by all people in the world if the world contains more than 7 billion people. Either you can continue and have the least percentage of the human world have access to this standard of living, or you need to step down and live very basic from what the industrialized world currently calls its "normality", or there can only be at the most 2 billion people throughout the world which live like that so the resources they consume is enough for this mass taken from one planet. As it neither is healthy for the earth as well as for other planets to exploit their resources of metal ore, nor it is going to cause the world a lot of joy being contamined by radiation that exists throughout space.
matrixmann: (Wasteland Ranger)
A batch of foreign and resident nations now interfere into the matters of the Middle East and act like too many cooks that spoil the broth...

July 2017

M T W T F S S
     1 2
34 56 78 9
1011 1213 1415 16
17 1819 2021 22 23
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Statistics


Free counters!

Free counters!
Page generated 26 July 2017 08:44 am