matrixmann: (Thinking)
When an icon of one's suicidal youth commits suicide himself, then it's indeed an irony that life offers there.
But, thinking about it, what's it with a hero, where does this status end and where does he start to be only a human being again? With own problems, desires, flaws and personal weaknesses?
It's actually so very simple. So simple that one forgets about it when he looks up to someone.
Every hero that is like an icon to those with demons plaguing them inside, most often he fights some demons inside himself. Even when it's long past having your biggest battle with them, the fight goes on because, once developed, these demons never let you go again. Until the end of your life.
And so... it comes that even a hero might surrender them, although everyone of that kind of human logically knows it is nonsense to do so.
But sometimes you don't know how strong they are, how much a plague they are to the protagonist and how long he already kept fighting them - or how long he already kept running away from them.
It's tough to judge this from the outside - from the outside it's always a pretty easy job to do.
Much tougher it always is when judging it from the inside and taking note of one's abilities and capacities to overcome. How much he/she's caught up in the dependencies of his/her own life. And how much or less there's a way out of it what is plaguing someone.
In that point, even a hero is just a human...
And those things may press him to the wall until he's "about to break".
matrixmann: (Black suits comin')
"Which one of your oaths is the one more important to you?"
"Of course that oath to protect civil life from harm!"
"Then why don't you rebel against your superior when he just orders you to harm the people you swore to protect?!"
matrixmann: (Waiting for command)
"You think, when you're out of school you're free, sonny? Oh, hell no! Then work life calls for you - and work life is only a continuation of what's been happening in school, only worse and even more strict. What you already were there, you gonna be also in your job life. If you were a loser, a slacker or a victim of your school mates' coping methods for boredom already there, then you gonna be the same among your colleagues. A really, really small cog in the clockwork...
The only way you'll not be forced to deal with this is when you happened to be born to an incredibly wealthy family or if you managed to become rich on your own before the day you leave school. Which is like zero probability.
So, don't even try to think you're a bigwig that gets his way."


30 June 2017 12:40 am
matrixmann: (Thinking)
"What most people do wrong in understanding politics and processes in society is: All things are interlinked. 5 threads or more inflict influence upon each other at the same time, and that's just only the present! Then add processes that are deeply linked and dependent on history to it.
Everything's as it is because of particular reasons - and the reasons are: The many complex threads of information that meet in one spot.
Trying to get a detailed overview constructed in one's head - like a map of a geographical area - about those actually is understanding the matter.
Unterstanding the matter is the base for developing the path to the future and preventing unwanted processes."
matrixmann: (Thinking)
Jemand, der dauernd nur auf andere aufpasst, muss nicht sich selbst ansehen.

Someone who only takes care of others all the time, he doesn't need to take a look at himself.


16 May 2017 07:50 am
matrixmann: (Thinking)
Brain stop!
What did you get me in this vexation?

You make me bad,
you bring me trouble,
counselors and schooling pack,
you make me double

The world is sane,
what I have to see
what I do is strange,
it's mocking me


I deserve what's happening to me ("me" elongated)

Roaring folks behind me
and they call:
We hunt you, we gonna find you!
We eat you, we gonna whip you!
And if we have you, we gonna kill you!

Fresh start,
I could be happy in salvation!

Another view,
another life,
no troubles with you,
I'll stay alive

Friends are mine,
a mate for me,
family backs up my spine,
and I got jobs to be

They see right up the lie in me ("me" elongated)



Bitch, you! - We gonna get you!
Hack you, we gonna grind you!
And set you, we gonna crush you!

(Instrumental passage of chorus music)

I can't
I bring it
To cherish my conviction
The sounds,
I'm sinning,
my brightest malediction,
you've found
I did it,
to serve this vile addiction

I could be happy in salvation...



We hate you, we gonna stop you!
Pest, you! We gonna hang you!
And end you, we gonna shame you!

Oh, I'm the devil alive...

(longer instrumental passage; music the same as for introduction of verses)

Musical genre: Trance / Hardtrance (Electronic)

Cursive text: Annotations about music / vocals


4 March 2017 09:11 am
matrixmann: (Waiting for command)
"...Human rights need to be preserved...!"
"Human rights - do you really know what this term means? Do you actually have an imagination in mind what it means when these are taken away from you? Do you fucking know what it means to daily awake in a cell, the guards clinging with their tonfas through the bars all over the jail and the first thing they do is beating you up before breakfast? Do you fucking know what it means to get raped three times a day by various people and they spit down on you, piss on you and laugh about you? Can you feel what it means to get played on and it's fun to your torturer to break your bones and see you scream? Do you have any idea how it feels inside to be exposed to the public, to get thrown dirt at and you know either when you don't do as the hosts say or not, the audience is gonna rip you to pieces? Can you feel how terrified you are in all these situations? Or when your Mom, 3 times taller than you, beats you up as a child and locks you in the dark basement as punishment for screaming from pain?
When you stand before a bunch of youngsters that wait to take the popcorn out of their pockets while you cut yourself, shout at them for teasing you everyday anew?"
"... ..."
"Before repeating this term over and over again, get the hell of aware what it actually means! It's not about democracy, freedom all these empurpled phrases! It's not about headscarfs and crosses, gender equality, and you being prefered for a job because you're a woman! It's not about something you can catalog and protect with paper and pencil or claim before a court!
It's about not waking up everyday and the first thing you experience is getting smacked in the face and treated like somebody's tool for pleasure! - when you walk on the street, you get shot for fucking nothing! when you try to be a man, but still get raped and molested because for some still you are a woman for all eternity!
Before you pamper around the next time about your wrong life decisions being "discrimination" or civilian death exists in war, think twice what you get excited about!
You go to university and even your parents pay your ass, some even need to kill to be able to go to school! Some even kill because of school, because it drives them mad!
You think you've seen something?! Fuck it, the only thing you've seen is your golden cage from the inside! And that's the way you act and think!"

Can be seen as a correction or addition to this one:
matrixmann: (Ready)
Lifestyles open doors to certain life decisions. Some are incompatible with certain decisions. Some also don't contain certain decisions. Literally, it's not on that path to be put to choose for certain things.
But, in return, they also open up doors to decisions that other lifestyles don't contain. Which you wouldn't be able to make - or options to choose between wouldn't be put before you, if you took another path.
In figuring one's own way to live, that's the point one must comprehend.
You can't have everything; you can't live a life with a family while you rather feel well when fooling around. You can't imagine to have big assets if you don't have the ambition and the brains to aim for any higher goals at all. You also can't do a traveling circus and work everywhere abroad and far away while there's somebody at home waiting for you and depending on you. As well... you can't live your secret identities and still think you can go the common path of getting married, having children and living happily ever after like all the other people.
Some paths are not the straight paths - and that's what one needs to know.
But, as said, those paths which are not compliant with the straight paths, the usual paths in life, they also have their special advantages. Pathways and forks that don't open up to the others that took one of those straight paths. Experiences that they are not going to make.
Disappointments they'll make conversely won't necessarily be the ones you will make.

One needs to take it as the strange winks of life that it sometimes has, and which it doesn't choose for long who it'll force them upon. It just lets them rain down, and it'll ask from you either to deal with them or to go down trying to pretend to yourself that you can still do the way that all the other people do.
Society on that path an also pretend to you a lot that there are various possibilities to combine both ways, the straight and the unusual one, but think twice if this is even realistic.
Nothing is a combination of both paths if you have to convince all of your environment that the way you do it is not harmful to the kids you gonna have.
matrixmann: (Thinking)
"Be yourself somewhere else!" - "So then you want me to be a puppet, a servant to sey yes to everything that you voice and that you do in your life?"
matrixmann: (Thinking)
It's tough of a deal to watch comrades dying away, not being able to treat their wounds, to soothe their anger and hate, and to stop them from committing actions which prove to be senseless in the end...
matrixmann: (Thinking)
Be aware of old stuff being able to return. There can always be a case, even if you don't guess it.
It might not be like the first time, or the previous time when you had an encounter with it, but still you'll be faced with things you are somewhat familiar with and you might think that you exactly know where this road is going to get you at.
A big fail - be ready for surprises and be ready to take on things that you haven't seen before. Also, be ready for detours and for temptations and twists.
matrixmann: (Thinking)
Worin liegt der Schlüssel zur Boshaftigkeit?
...In dem Moment, wenn du begreifst, dass du jemandem oder etwas alles antun kannst, was du willst, und niemand kommt, um dich dafür zu bestrafen. Egal wie grausam, unfair, ekelhaft, pervers, verächtlich oder unmenschlich es auch sein mag.

Wherein lies the key to malignity?
...The moment when you realize you can do anything that you want to anyone or anything and there's no-one coming up to punish you for what you've done. No matter how cruel, unfair, disgusting, perverted, despicable or inhuman it may be.
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
"Fuck your celebrating of the 80s and Neue Deutsche Welle over and over again - as one of the most decadent decades that one has seen recently! One day you gonna do it with this decade too because remembering one of any of the others would make people discover intelligence and education again!"
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
"Your unconditional basic income is a nice idea, but here's the flaw in your system: It reestablishes how the old social benefits worked, but it doesn't change anything on the factor "prices". As well as that it doesn't change those facts that still each year it's the goal of all national economies to impress each other by proving how much percentage they can compile in attaching zeroes to the sums of the last year ( = GDP) and that the economy it ought to function in only can keep itself up by generating lots of fictional money that doesn't exist out of credits it didn't hand out to one customer, so it's whole self-asserted "growth" is nothing more than multiplying the sums that have originally been there before a few hundred, a few thousand years ago. In other terms: Not only you keep adjusting the sum each year, you also don't change anything that makes it so nessecary that this basic income needs to exist at all. You only make the circumstances takeable again. But that because you don't really know what you're trying to fight when you talk about "overcoming capitalism".
You're still one of those dreamy starry-eyed idealists that don't know how the world they live in really works."
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
As a pick-up of this:

People talk a lot about their alleged individuality, but when you go through the interests displayed by their social media profiles - and there cannot be made the suspicion they only enter it for distracting other people from guessing their could be something important to get from them -, you come across the same kind of contents over and over again. Privately in real life, it's barely different.
During these years, movies are not the big players in the game, music had been so for a longer amount of time and is no more - due to the various possibilities to go for what they call "your thing" -, literature is something that still passes some people, so TV series are the bigger craze; that's also due to cinema being repetitive and bringing up no new ideas during this episode, doing remakes of everything and nothing they ever created in Hollywood.
And what is the case? Everywhere you go, each country which you come across, people seem to name the same things over and over again as the things they like and the things they are interested in. Nothing against quality, but these days you cannot spare but regarding all of that under some kind of forced political agenda. Eventually - why is everyone excited about content exceptionally mostly produced in the US?
Why do people eat each and every shit of a TV series coming from America?
The biggest gimmicks these days are turning 12 Monkeys into a TV series and the Scream movies! Like they haven't been good enough as they were made!
And people even get excited about content that newly filmed shit! Like they didn't know what originally was supposed to happen!
Why do people worldwide know nothing more than to watch Game Of Thrones, The Big Bang Theory, The Walking Dead, Dexter, Hannibal, Person Of Interest, The Blacklist, Black Sails, Sons Of Anarchy, Breaking Bad - a few years earlier: Teen Wolf, Vampire Diaries, True Blood, Glee, CSI: Miami (and its offsprings from other cities), Navy CIS, Hannah Montana, Taken; even earlier: Emergency Room, Grey's Anatomy, Scrubs, Dr. House, Lost, Desperate Housewifes, Sex And The City, King Of Queens, Gilmore Girls - Sabrina the Teenage Witch, Buffy and so on?!
Are people that stupid or easy to impress that American filming industry always finds an easy way to push their buttons?!
The type of that people which watched all this shit as it was current are those kind to have a habit to tell all tell all Manga / Anime freaks that it's all the same which they consume as an entertainment - that they consume anything that comes from Japan in comics, cartoon movies and video games -, but they themselves are none of the better, only with a different focus of attention!!
Brainwashed and Americanized!
And by that kind of people you wanna be taught a lesson about "being individual" and thinking yourself?
They are as individual as a stencil! They can think from the West side to the East side of the road!
They don't even take notice how much they are like their neighbor!
At the latest since Ikea has become the main sponsor of furniture for lots of apartments, they don't even notice how much even their living room looks like the one of the neighbor!
And those rave the most about being individual, being special and being one in a million that needs to be cried for when they die!
You know what? If you wanna get an opinion about mankind, just fucking look at this targeted remote control and see for yourself!
All fucking caged full purses imagening they're someone and they live in wide open lands.
matrixmann: (Thinking)
Die klassichen Arbeitsteilung von Mann und Frau der früheren Jahrhunderten sollte auch unter dem Aspekt der Arbeitsteilung betrachtet werden.
Ein Tag hat nur 24 Stunden; wenn einerseits Geld, andererseits aber auch Essen gekauft, zubereitet, häusliche Arbeiten wie Wäsche waschen, Putzen und sonstige Erhaltungsarbeiten als auch die Besorgung von Trinkwasser bewältigt werden müssen ohne Zuhilfenahme moderner Geräte wie Waschmaschinen, Herden und Autos, trinkbares Wasser ebenso nicht aus einer Leitung und einem Hahn, sondern aus einem Brunnen respektive durch eine Pumpe aus dem Erdreich geschöpft werden müssen, dann erreichen, allein durch das tägliche Zeitlimit bedingt, die Möglichkeiten eines Menschen die Grenzen des Machbaren für den Einzelnen.
Es müssen also mehrere Personen an der Bewältigung des Haushalts beteiligt sein und an seiner Aufrechterhaltung. Erst die Mittel der Moderne machen es möglich, dass jemand all dies allein bestreiten kann, und dass beide Partner einer Beziehung vollzeit arbeiten gehen können (noch dazu zu den gleichen Tageszeiten).
Es ermöglicht sogar, dass nicht die älteren Kinder (ab ca. 7 / 8 Jahren) einer Familie fester Bestandteil dieser Aufrechterhaltung der täglichen Lebensbasis mehr sein müssen und es lediglich noch eine Frage der Vorbereitung auf das Leben als Erwachsener in einem eigenen Haushalt sein kann.

Vielleicht eine gewagte These: Obgleich beide Geschlechter hätten jeweils den Part des anderen einnehmen können ohne dabei nach diskriminierenden Punkten vorgehen zu müssen, bildete sich diese Form der Arbeitsteilung heraus auf Grund der biologisch bedingten physischen Eigenschaften der beiden Geschlechter. Männer sind in der Muskelkraft stärker als Frauen, deswegen sind sie besser geeignet für physisch anstrengenden Arbeiten und den täglichen Broterwerb - der ohne die Zuhilfenahme moderner Maschinen, nur mit Hilfe von Handarbeit, größte Anforderungen an den menschlichen Körper stellt.
Frauen dagegen müssen zwar für die Hausarbeit ein stabiles Rückrat haben, welches für beide Geschlechter gleichermaßen wichtig ist, da auch sie Lasten transportieren und Muskelkraft aufwenden müssen, es ist dennoch leichter für sie zu bewältigen, Wäsche mit einem Waschbrett zu waschen als 30 Kilo schwere Gemüse- oder Getreidesäcke zu tragen. Oder Gemüse zu putzen, zu schneiden und einen Kesel Suppe aus ihnen zu kochen anstelle ein Feld manuell zu bearbeiten.
Wenn eine Frau keinen Mann hatte - weil keiner sie wollte oder ihr Mann bereits verstorben war und kein Sohn bereits reif genug war, die Rolle in der Arbeitsteilung zu übernehmen - konnte es ihr passieren, dass sie solche Tätigkeiten trotzdem ausführen musste aus dem Grunde, dass sie dazu gezwungen war, weil es niemand anderes für sie tat. Manche Exemplare - sowohl heute als auch in früheren Zeiten - waren dabei weniger, andere besser begabt und dafür geschaffen.
Für Männer galt dasselbe an dieser Stelle auf Grund des vorherrschenden Patriarchats einmal nicht, da sie sich wesentlich schneller wieder eine Frau nehmen konnten oder wenigstens ihre Töchter die Rolle der Mutter in der Arbeitsteilung übernehmen mussten, sobald sie groß genug dafür waren.

Für das Grundlegende kann aber gesagt werden: Ob es Diskriminierungsgründe gewesen sind oder nicht, sekundär, im Detail betrachtet, ergibt sich sogar aus dieser Form der Arbeitsteilung eine gewisse Logik, die einige Zweifel offen lässt, ob lediglich Diskriminierung an Hand des Geschlechts dazu geführt hat, dass Mann und Frau die Arbeiten zugeteilt bekommen haben, die sie erhielten.
Ohne die technischen Hilfsmittel der Moderne wäre es auch heute nicht möglich, anders zu leben als auf diese Art und Weise - die Arbeit zu teilen, Aufgaben zuzuweisen, je nach der persönlichen Begabung und den physischen Möglichkeiten des Einzelnen.
Arbeitsteilung ist sogar etwas, was in die Moderne überlebt hat - wenn auch nicht mehr ganz so ausladend wie es in früheren Jahrhunderten der Fall war.
An Stelle der freien Zeit, die durch die Arbeitserleichterung durch Maschinen entsteht, wachsen Hobbys, andere Verpflichtungen, soziale Verpflichtungen, längere Arbeitszeiten - generell oder aufgrund von freiwilligen Überstunden wegen des zusätzlichen Geldes -, Vergnügen, Unterhaltung und das Befassen mit dem Weltgeschene - sowohl in politischer als auch in sonstiger Hinsicht.
Es eröffnet auch den Raum dafür, sich schick zu kleiden, sich zu schminken, einen Duft aufzulegen, weil man durch weniger Schmutzquellen belastet ist, und balzen zu gehen, insofern man noch keinen Partner gefunden hat, oder gar den bestehenden - ganz übel - durch einen anderen auszutauschen.
matrixmann: (Ready)
Scenario: Picking up a glass of water and taking a sip.

The hand reaches to the glass. Through the fingertips the brain gets to know the glass is cold, its surface is smooth or rough, it's clear or it has carvings and ornaments.
Visually the eyes see something's in the glass, they register its color, if you can look through the liquid or not, they also observe the color of the glass itself and the ornaments drawn on it.
If the hand pushes the glass for a tiny length, the ears hear what it sounds like if the glass moves over the ground it stands on. Visually, the eyes take notice that the liquid starts to move in the vessel too.
If then the hand tries to pick the glass up, it needs to learn how to do it.
It needs to realize how to coordinate its fingers and the single musles and sinews that are attached to the hand to get the glass off the table without it, primarily, falling to the floor and secondly keep it in a balance so the liquid isn't spilled. - A matter of feeling through the tips and coordinating it with the visuals that the eyes deliver to the brain.
When it gets it up to the mouth, again the temperature of the glass gets detected. If it is too hot, the brain assumes the liquid in it also is hot and it puts it back in its place on the table.
If this is not the case, the hand again tries to figure how to make the water go inside the mouth cavity. It tries to reach it with lips and tongue, it tries to tilt the glass so the water runs down the vessel into the mouth. If one method does not succeed as much as desired, the brain tries another method.
As water hits the mouth cavity and moistens the tongue, the liquid in the glass generates the image of its taste. Is it spicy, is it sweet, is it salty, is it bitter or is it acidic?
By putting the glass back into its horizontal position and back on the table, the experience is fulfilled.

The brain saves back every information it gathered through the process, single as well as in connection with solely these impressions.
A time when doing the same action again, it will remember it - how it did it, what effects it had upon itself and the surroundings, how it felt, what it looked like, what it sounded like.
Unless being proved different, the brain archives the liquid "water" in connection with "cold", picking up a glass with a smooth or a rough surface, moving it with the sound it made when being pushed on the table, the glass itself being heavy and requiring muscular power to get it up.
If one or more impressions don't fit the effect of the action, or an effect is learned that naturally is not caused by this action, the brain puts it into the archive and when taking out that knowledge acquired, the brain is confused over its action not having the effect that it wanted to achieve.
Or worse: The brain makes the body execute an action and people watching it confusedly give you the hint that this doesn't work that you're trying to do. For example, they give you the hint that a real fish tank can't be zoomed in like on a screen of a tablet computer. Either you need to get closer to the glass to see better with your own eyes, or you need to get adapted to the fact that the vision that you have is the best you can get.
If you eat chicken and it is incredibly hot-spiced, when knowing nothing about seasoning, you may not ever touch it again because the brain associates chicken with "so hot you cannot eat it".

One information gets archived in connection with at least one other.
If a brain is missing these other impressions to the senses, it only has a limited impression of what a circumstance really is like.
If wrong associations get put into the archive, things which don't naturally depend on each other or are in no connection at all - like playing a video game, but listing to completely different music and no sound effects -, a wrong imagination is created of what a subject is like.
Like switching on the TV when wanting something to eat.
And it further leads to actions which logically don't make any sense, but makes sense in the dimension of a brain that learned to connect a thing with another, even though it does not suit the first.
matrixmann: (Thinking)
People are domesticated. That's the reason why they don't fight back, why they don't fight their rulers even though they're uncontent with them.
They simply - got robbed of their knowledge, their instincts, what to do if someone doesn't treat you well. What would be their most natural reactions to that kind of treatment.
Instead they're paralyzed, apathetic, don't know what to do and have a feeling of overall powerlessness.
Because they have the internalized feeling of "I'm not allowed to" and harming that maxim is going to draw punishment after it for them.

If someone wants to address this and take people out of their misery, he needs to start with this point.
Teach them again to show the most basic natural reactions when an animal is forced into a corner.
And tell them "it's okay, you're not uncivilized if you're doing this".
Allowing them to follow their instincts again.
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
Spectator to a person's life you have once known.
A small house with garden, green in the back as well as in the front. A big chestnut tree in the backyard on the border to the property of the neighboring yard, some children's toys can be seen lying in the grass.
All looks fine and clean and well-maintained.
The car can be found in the carport or parking nearby in the street. It's a pretty recent type, and even not a poorly one, probably it's purchased on credit.
Sure somebody most earn a lot to afford this...
Looking into the deep, you recognize his father's house besides next to it. The maintaining looks similar to it. Only the backyard is greater, there's more property that can be seen due to age and time working, being able to acquire belongings.
Memories of a few years earlier cross the mind... Comparing them to what you find in the present, it raises a waterfall of questions.
How did that come? How did somebody embrace the bourgeois lifestyle who once spoke pretty much against it?
What has happened in the meantime?
It's like a nightmare coming true and a manifestation of what people always warn you about.
Does that mean what it's always called like "getting older"? Do all people, when they age, bury their ideals, or were these ideals serious at all? A phenomenon of puberty?

Does it make you happy living the same life as your father, working for your father?
Does it make you happy being bound by a wife, being bound by a child and by all that stuff that you call your own?
Did you finish school with higher graduation just to end up in the same town like your parents, living next door to them? Gaining profit from what they have built up during their lives?
Where did your talking stay about wanting to make the world a better place? Where does someone see your political intelligence now?
Or did you just surrender to the impression that it doesn't matter what you do?
Have you realized your lifestyle is costly?

Or did you believe in it for a time and now you're trapped in a cage and you don't know the way out? You keep going on because other doors are closed to you?

It rather seems implausible that a once starry-eyed idealist can be happy in a life like this.
matrixmann: (Waiting for command)
"Wer vergisst, dass seine Faust einen Menschen töten kann, der läuft Gefahr, seine eigene Zerstörungskraft zu unterschätzen.
Schutz ist nicht immer die angebrachteste Methode, um für Frieden zu sorgen.
Manche Menschen wollen gern Krieg führen.
Manche Menschen wollen den anderen gern beneiden.
Manche Menschen wollen auch einfach nur ihre Ruhe haben.

Vergesslichkeit gegenüber der Gewalt bewirkt irgendwann, dass man schnell zu ihr greift, weil man sie als nicht allzu drastisch erachtet."

Um ein altes, vor langer Zeit einmal erwähntes Thema zu besprechen und eventuell sogar zu erweitern: Damals noch allein auf die deutsche Problematik bezogen, ergibt sich, wenn man versucht, sich ein Bild von verschiedenen internationalen liberalen Bewegungen zu machen, und den gesellschaftlichen und kulturellen Einfluss, den diese bereits auf die allgemeine Lebensart gehabt haben, eine sehr ähnliche Konstellation.
Man könnte sogar schon verschwörerisch davon sprechen, sie hätten alle einen gemeinsamen geografischen Ursprung.
In, so ziemlich, allen westlichen Staaten ist das Thema Gewalt mit einem Tabu belegt und es wird in die Ecke unliebsamen Verhaltens geschoben.
Moralisch ist daran nichts verwerfliches auszusetzen - wohin käme man, wenn es kollektiv toleriert wäre, sich regelmäßig gegenseitig zu verprügeln und abzustechen?
Was allerdings in den Hintergrund gerät - und was einem mehr oder minder energisch von den liberalen Protestbewegungen versucht wird anderweitig weis zu machen -, ist die Tatsache, das Gewalt Bestandteil der Essenz des Lebens ist. Jegliche Form des Überlebens birgt einen Akt der Gewalt in sich, ob es nun ein Pflanze ist, die man tötet oder isst, oder ob es ein anderes Tier ist, welches man isst, um selbst weiter zu leben.
Die gesellschaftlichen Bewegungen, die in den letzten 50 Jahren die Bühne betreten haben, versuchen, diese Tatsache anzuzweifeln und den Menschen, die sie beeinflussen wollen, ebenso gleiches zu erzählen. Gewalt ist in ihren Augen höchst verdammungswürdig, obwohl es nicht immer die Möglichkeit in der Natur als auch im gesellschaftlichen Zusammenleben gibt, darum herumzukommen.
Ein weiteres, was diese Bewegungen verkennen - wenn der Mensch im Begriff ist, aufzuwachsen, muss er dennoch lernen, zu welcher körperlichen und zu welcher Zerstörungskraft er fähig ist. Wenn dies nicht in seinem Erfahrungsschatz vorhanden ist, und somit auch nicht in seinem geistigen gegenwärtigen Bewusstsein, so wird er in diesem Punkt maßlos werden.
Er lernt nicht, dass ein Tritt gegen den Kopf tödlich ist, oder wenigstens schwerwiegende lebenslange Schädigungen hervorrufen kann.
Analog dazu, lernt er auch nicht, diese Kraft im Zaum zu halten und sie lediglich dann anzuwenden, wenn alle anderen Handlungsoptionen nicht den gewünschten Effekt bewirken und, wenn er selbst angegriffen wird, wie viel Zuschlagen noch alleinige Notwehr ist und wo es bereits beginnt, dass er seinen Angreifer unfreiwillig tötet.

Ein weiteres, das dieses Tabu bringt, ist für diejenigen, die bereits mit übermäßig vieler Gewalt konfrontiert wurden und die nicht die typische Opferposition einnehmen.
Wer enthemmter ist, oder mental dadurch duldsamer gegenüber Szenarien und Schilderungen anderer ist, gilt sehr schnell als barbarisch und als gewaltverherrlichend. Obwohl er vielleicht nur einen Umstand aus dem Leben zitiert, der unbestritten mechanisch so abläuft und nicht änderbar ist.
Der Verdacht, dass so jemand einen Hang zu eigener Täterschaft hat ist ebenso begründet wie auch hysterisch. Zumal es verkennt auch die Situationen im gewöhnlichen Leben, in denen friedliche Mittel nicht die Antwort bringen, und in denen solcherlei geringere Hemmung eventuell sogar von praktischem Nutzen ist (z. B. Personenschutz und "Zivilcourage").

Eine vielleicht sogar noch schlimmere Sache, die diese Verdammung von Gewalt aus der eigenen Existenz mit sich bringt, ist aber die folgende:
Wenn Menschen es nur noch gewohnt sind, in einer für sie bedrohungsfreien oder wenigstens bedrohungsarmen Umgebung zu leben, dann wird sie das erste Durchbrechen dieser wohl behüteten Welt in ein Trauma versetzen.
Es wird ihnen so fremd sein, dass es ihnen unnatürlich vorkommt. Wie etwas, dass im Großen und Ganzen, das sich "Leben" nennt, eigentlich nicht vorzukommen hat. (Vergleiche: )
Solche Erscheinungen sind z. B. in der modernen Gesellschaft, es als barbarisch zu empfinden, Tiere schlachten zu müssen, um sie zu essen, während es vor nicht einmal 100 Jahren zwar als nicht angenehm, aber durchaus als eine notwendige als auch in der Gesellschaft vorkommende Sache angesehen wurde. Die stetige Ernährungssituation vor der großangelegten industriellen Verarbeitung und Herstellung von Lebensmitteln zwang einfach dazu. (Man war froh, in der Woche in Stück Fleisch essen zu können.)
Selbiges gilt auch für das Verständnis von Zusammenleben in der Gesellschaft als auch für das Beeinflussen von Gesellschaft, Staat und Politik.
Ein in der Moderne aufgewachsener Mensch, der von all den Agendas, die diese gesellschaftlichen Gruppen in das tägliche Bewusstsein haben einfließen lassen, bereits in seinen Grundfesten beeinflusst ist, tut sich schwer damit, zu realisieren, dass die Mächtigen seinen friedlichen Protest ignorieren, indem, dass sie den Vorhang zuziehen.
Er tut sich ebenso schwer damit, wenn er denn den gedanklichen Bogen zu Taten statt bunten Schildern findet, ein Maß zu finden statt nur sinnlose Zerstörung walten zu lassen.
Es muss dann nicht mehr nur Gewalt gegen einen Beamten sein, der ihn zu Unrecht schlägt, sondern auch angezündete Mülltonen, ausgeraubte Geschäfte und zerschlagene parkende Autos.
Ihn darauf hinzuweisen, ist dann für ihn gleichweitig damit, als wenn man jemandem Appetit macht und ihm dann aus einem 5-Gänge-Menü nur die Vorspeise vorsetzt.

So etwas passiert aber, wenn man es jemandem verwehrt, seine eigene Zerstörungskraft zu erkunden, wenn er in einem Alter ist, wo diese Zerstörung noch überschaubare Ausmaße annehmen kann ( = als Kind).
Wenn man Gewalt zu etwas unnatürlichem verdammt und versucht, es aus dem Kontext des menschlichen Zusammenlebens zu entfernen.

Es dient keinesfalls dem Schutz oder dem Befürworten von asozialem, schädigendem Verhalten, es dient vielmehr dem Erläutern, was passiert, wenn es Menschen regelrecht verboten wird, sich zu raufen, oder sich gegen Angreifer, die diesem Tabu nicht folgen, zu wehren.
Menschen, denen ihr Selbsterhaltungstrieb ausgetrieben wurde, sind so hilflos und schutzlos wie Neugeborene. Man muss sich ständig um sie kümmern, sie bleiben abhängig von dem Gutdünken von anderen und werden niemals fähig, ein vollständig eigentständiges Leben zu führen.
Menschen, die außerdem keine Widrigkeiten aushalten können, die ihnen das Leben von Natur aus beschweren kann, sind zu empfindlich um lang auf dieser Welt zu überleben - obendrein werden sie relativ unfähig sein, Kinder großzuziehen, die natürliche Widrigkeiten oder überhaupt ihr eigenes Temperament aushalten können.
Außerdem wird es zu einer Gesellschaft führen, in der alle, die dieses Gewalttabu nicht beachten, dem Rest der Gemeinde, die lediglich in Frieden leben wollen, ihren Terror aufzwingen können.

Dass man Opfern von körperlicher und sonstigen Formen von Gewalt Verständnis und Nachsicht gegenüber entgegen bringt, ist verständlich, bis zu einem gewissen Punkt sogar verantwortlich.
Wenn jemand nach Jahren aber immer noch nicht über eine Sache hinweg ist, so muss man das Zugeständnis machen "es können nicht alle ewig dieses Thema ausblenden und darauf achten, nichts unangenehmes bei dir hervorzurufen - wenn sich jemand an Sexualität stört, wird auch niemand für ihn die Plakate abmachen und die ganze Werbebranche umkrempeln; er wird gezwungen sein, weg- oder einfach hindurchzusehen".

Aus der östlichen Hemispähre ist dieser tabuisierte Umgang mit Gewalt weniger bekannt. Vielleicht, weil die Einsicht in die tatsächliche Notwendigkeit dort traditionell eine andere ist.

Falls jemand diesen Text als Aufruf zu Gewalt und zu Straftaten ansehen sollte, so betrachte ich dies als Verleumdung. Vielleicht ist es eine Spur gewaltverherrlichend, wenn "gewaltverherrlichend" bedeutet, dass man keine Scheu davor besitzt, sich auch mit diesem Thema ernsthaft auseinander zu setzen und nicht nur den Leitlinien einiger von Übersee inspirierten Lobbys gedankenlos zu folgen. Dafür sind aber auch die Markierungen "graphic (18+)" und "controversial" in den Tags angeheftet.

July 2017

     1 2
34 56 78 9
1011 1213 1415 16
17 1819 2021 22 23


RSS Atom


Free counters!

Free counters!
Page generated 25 July 2017 08:45 am