Complex

30 June 2017 12:40 am
matrixmann: (Thinking)
"What most people do wrong in understanding politics and processes in society is: All things are interlinked. 5 threads or more inflict influence upon each other at the same time, and that's just only the present! Then add processes that are deeply linked and dependent on history to it.
Everything's as it is because of particular reasons - and the reasons are: The many complex threads of information that meet in one spot.
Trying to get a detailed overview constructed in one's head - like a map of a geographical area - about those actually is understanding the matter.
Unterstanding the matter is the base for developing the path to the future and preventing unwanted processes."
matrixmann: (Thinking)
(Attention: This is highly speculative content and shouldn't be taken with scientific correctness!
Further down, it also shouldn't be taken as hatespeech or as a base to reason artificial interferences to execute population policy.
At first, it's just thoughts considering and philosophizing about a subject and it's meant as nothing more than that.)




World population grows every year, mainly in Africa and Asia.
Although in those areas, at least Africa the most, the common health care accessible to the normal people is far away from being satisfying. Still a lot of people die in their child years.
But even though, of those who are born, still a higher number manages to survive to make the population grow.
Is that so?
Population growth in Europe and other areas in the world counted as "developed" these days, it happened the most as technological and scientific progress appeared. As the influence of the Christian churches slowly declined, compared to the Middle Ages.
The increase in what health care could provide from the scientific viewpoint, and even the more as the distribution to the normal populace with low and average income for the time episode started to take place (for the sake of taking the soil away from social democrats and early communists), this is what is considered as the main reason for the explosive population growth that appeared between the 19th and the 20th century.
In Asia, this is partly the case, if you take a look at China which keeps increasing its capacities for provision constantly. But compare it to India. India is rich in population, but still the caste system is intact and richness and the deepest poverty both exist in this country without ever seeing light at the end of the tunnel to ever change. The normal population can't have that access to proper health care, otherwise it couldn't be one of the main research countries for medication tests on humans.
So, how would this rule apply there? Health care increasing the chances of survival of the individual, while people still tend to have families with many children born because of social reasons?
Is the population in the "developing" countries really the problem, if distribution of health care to everyone, as a base for survival of the masses of people born, is no topic in those despite economy experiencing growth all the time?

Taking a look at Europe and the already "developed" areas.
Population numbers in those areas have never been higher than today. Today is the max for these ever in history.
If those wouldn't live from getting people from other areas of the world moving into their territory, population numbers would already be in a noticeable decline. (Except for US because reproductive rights are under constant threat of clerical conservatives of being abandoned or killed by lack of funding, and people from the lower classes, who bear the most children there, depend on social programs to provide this to them, as proper distribution of health care to people from all states of wealth doesn't exist there.)
In the developed nations, about 95% of the population born survives into old age. Predators in the 5%-quota are diseases, malformations, accidents, pollution, man-made violence and psychic diseases caused by circumstances habored in this way of civilization.
So, population numbers in those areas remain constant with a slight decline in the long term. They get actively tried to be kept on the max. Be it home-bred population or through immigration.
And this through all the times.
So... basically, where does the point of attention lie really when it comes down to population policy?
In the developing countries, where still the least of the humans born survives until they're adults, and they die in a young age because of diseases damaging their health, or in those areas where nearly every person born survives until approximately 60 at least? And the number of people achieving this is being kept relatively constant at all times?
It may be worth picking up this hard constrast "95% survival" vs. "high mortality" for a closer look.
While the times of boom economic growth are over in the developed world, everything's build up that needed to be build up, now it only suffers from wrong proportion of the distribution, population decline in harsher numbers would be the logical consequence - as, in the phase of building something up, it needs more resources than when only maintaining and keeping up the state of things as they are currently. Also, there is not a need for "more" resources to be used as ante in the process.
Not even to speak of when the next stage of the technoligical age becomes reality and some more machines replace the human labor in the productive sectors, which makes the part of the population being employed in that sector become out of work and for sure also a part of them "obsolete" in the terms of the employment market.
So to say, the high population numbers of the developed world, in the long term, progress into a state of all of its population that it habors isn't "needed" anymore. It's like only in a position of consuming and sucking up resources, in a position of being a "consumer". Unable to give back or be of relevance to the integrity of the system. Others would call it drastically "trash", that's what they are then. - "Trash" that would need to be administered until its death and not be renewed / replaced by another person, to be exact.
So... when an area tries to keep its population number up in a state like before the big industrial boom at the beginning of the 20th century that it actually doesn't need anymore, it raises the question towards "How healthy for the planet is this strategy?"? How good in population policy worldwide is this actually?
And how much does it distort the numbers?
How much is it a factor that's part of the overall problem?
How much does that overclocked number cause in damage because a part of the population already exists in needlessness, but still they consume resources like all other people who are needed by the system to function?
To state something very clearly: The people who this applies to, they aren't to blame for what they are. If they have worked through a respective way of education and even performing an occupation for an amount of time throughout their lives, then there's no talking about "self-caused circumstances". Those people aren't obsolete because they haven't had ambitions and therefore were lazy and spoiled since a very young age. They've become obsolete because the system they live in doesn't need them anymore. In a certain span of time they were needed indeed, but now no more. - In difference to people who didn't even try for a decent school education and stayed away from it to hang out with friends, drink beer and destroy window glasses.
Therefore, because they're not to blame, they should at no point of the story be treated like if they were.
The solution for these should just be, plain and simple, to not to replace them in the next generation. Their life remains untouched, but as there is no need to have another person regrow into that position, there better shouldn't exist one to respawn.

When these obsolete numbers are being kept and maintained constantly, how much does it distort the real needs and the real functionality of the system that humans build for themselves to live in?
How much is it also responsible for overpopulation - for population that is there, but without a need of human civilization for them to exist?
What happens - how do the numbers look if that population doesn't exist anymore? In the developed world, as well as when Africa, Asia, South America only has the population number that it needs (considered, the economy of the "developing" areas also makes it to a state of things comparable to the so-called "industrialized nations" measured by what their environment allows)?
What if there are not that many people around anymore whose only purpose is to be there as a consumer because there is no task for them in this world?
And, what would happen to the yearly growth numbers if socially the issues of "children as security that supplies you in bad times / old age" would be adequately solved, in combination with that?
What would happen if mankind only grows or stays the same in such masses that it also has tasks for in its differing societies?

At least upon further thought it doesn't seem like the developed world is totally not to blame for the problem of the overpopulation. They try to keep up a number within their territories that's unrealistically high compared to the possible employment rate that it's able to supply when everything is run under fair circumstances (opposed to the current strategy of part-time work and letting the developing countries produce their food and their consumer goods).
When 95% of all humans survive until old age, you don't need people to have 2 and 3 children or more anymore. Better you should be happy if some people can't or don't want to have children because of certain reasons. Because that's getting closer to a realistic number, not even to speak of the children who would suffer for their whole lives as adults if there is no purpose in society for them.
And not even getting started to speak of the impact on the environment if there's one big resources-consumer less in the world...

It would be a drastic restructuring of society as it was to adapt to these circumstances with less people exsting again. But that process would be inevitable, as human civilization always finds a way of making work and production more effective than before, and by the time, this comes at the cost of human labor. No matter which economical system or system of world views it has in a century.
It is like one and only constant thread that keeps unfolding in history.

If not for those processes in mankind, which one can regard from one or another thousand positions, just think about the extinction of animal species: Animals vanished, as humans claimed the living space and bred like rabbits. Where humans live, animals have to go as humans want to live alone or even need the space for themselves.
One doesn't need to wonder about that process, as the earth has only a limited amount of living space.

Environment topics - overpopulation - vanishing of animal species - economy - social problems - all these topics are interconnected with each other. Each brick - another little factor in the other issue.
And when humans want to live up to the high goals they set for themselves in their enthusiasm, then they need to show a willingness to do something for this and to also adapt their societies to the links of the circumstances that are right in front of them.
There is no washing without getting wet. And no-one said it would be comfortable. Who thinks it would be, he lives in the world of a little child... Fairytales and unicorns.
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
"The land of the free never really cared about freedom. Not its politicians, not its oligarchs, not the people that really decide over the course of the country. It worked together with Nazis barely that they've fled from Europe just to bring down the Soviet Union because they were its political enemies. The United States - a Jew-friendly place? Open your eyes, by the time the Germans killed them by the masses in their concentration camps, nobody liked them anywhere either. Henry Ford was an anti-Semite, Disney was an anti-Semite - nobody thought about correcting their views or putting them to jail for it. Ford even had good trade relations with the Third Reich as long as it was possible. IBM delivered punch card machines for the bureaucratic administration of the concentration camps. If the United States really would have been so much against it, they had ordered those key technologies to be stopped to be delivered to the Nazis before they made the declaration of war. It would have just been a blow to them. Key technologies are always subject to the final OK of the state. If it doesn't happen, the administration doesn't want it. And the trail keeps continuing until the present. Fascists and butchers? As long as they're political enemies of an enemy of the states, they don't see reason why not making them their tool for a power change or to simply destroy the most promising competitor beside them.
One can't even tell how long in time this behavior goes back. It's been so much inherent to its system, it's like it goes back to the very early days - since the US was able to move on the international political parquet."
matrixmann: (Wasteland Ranger)
Is there a different way to win a war than sending troops and artillery?
There is: Do it the subtle way. Destroy the infrastructure, by selling and privatizing, to let your opponent pay off debts that actually don't exist. Erase the ability to do self-catering with home-grown food, introduce the dependence on imports. Carry technology and patents out of the country. If human intelligentsia can't be lured away, make sure they can't make any profit out of their knowledge anymore - forbid them to work in their disciplines, declare graduations and diplomas to be invalid. Abolish law and order and take your sweet time to install yours as the new ones - to let chaos move in, and crime take hold. Additionally, send your own criminals in to fool the masses and to let the daily terror on the streets be perfect. Pump your own wares and goods into the newly acquired territory - to calm down the conquered masses and to make profit yourself; best even is if you let it be accompanied by advertising and propaganda how good it is, how grateful people can be to have it, meanwhile you can do the dirty work to strip them off their assets. While being at the assets: Rearrange the overall property situation. If the pattern makes sense or not, it doesn't matter - the confusion and the gain for your own fraction is the main objective.
At the end of it all, most importantly: Break the morale, the mindset of the people that you annex. Deconstruct the education system and build it anew. Let culture disappear to be never seen again. Kill the spirit of what made these people up! Make sure that way that you're going to be happy with your annexion for the coming decades - 'cause the resistance fades away with the people aging.

Games

7 January 2017 08:33 pm
matrixmann: (Ready)
Whenever you keep seeing those big presentations and advertising of soccer events, you get the impression like the vision of a lot of dystopic SciFi authors or movie makers has come true: Shiny and glittering shows for the masses. Superstars to cheer at, heroes to believe in - and in the end, they're all created by some moguls that are kings of the mass media. For the purpose: To direct the view of the common people, to distract them or to get their looks to pay attention to the mass event presented which is not very much different from letting gladiators fight over their lives. They shall yell for their lives, think about nothing else except for that it's been a nice relief from everyday hard work or how they can become gladiators themselves, which they get shown in a way to perceive they're all paid with millions and a carefree life, everything to want and everything to look up at. And, what are they behind the curtains? Not the smartest, not the most moral, not the most honest - just a bunch of tragic figures which fulfill their task, but they're destined to realize only once they become too old to go on with that. Then the nature of their physical plague until that moment becomes obvious even to them.
But until then, new gladiators are found to take their places. And the masses go on yelling... Like, one or the other name, it doesn't matter. It's just some soccer players running for the amusement of some common people. Which somebody intended it for that it shall be this way.
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
Wisst ihr, warum der gesamte Westen nicht sagen kann "Kriminelle Asylanten lassen wir nicht rein in unser Land!" ( = Leute, die Asyl beantragen, die einem anderen Land bereits eine Straftat begangen haben)?
Weil sie dann ihre ganzen politisch liebsamen Flüchtlinge, die in ihrer Hemisphäre zu "Freiheitskämpfern" erhoben werden, während sie in ihrer Heimat als Kriminelle gesucht werden oder bereits verurteilt wurden, nicht mehr legal ins Land lassen könnten!
Diese würde die gleiche Regelung ebenfalls ereilen!
Genauso, wenn man plötzlich einen Teil der Bevölkerung eines anderen Landes zu seiner eigenen erklärt, ihnen die eigene Staatsbürgerschaft verleiht, um sie dem anderen Land als Bevölkerung zu entreißen!



You know why the whole West can't state "We don't let any criminal asylum seekers into our country!" ( = people who sign an application for asylum that have committed or been sentenced for crimes in their home countries)?
Because then they couldn't let those political refugees of the pleasantly kind legally in anymore which they call "freedom fighters" in their hemisphere while those are wanted in their home countries or have already been convicted!
Rulings like that would apply to these too!
The same when they suddenly declare a part of another country's populace to be populace of their own and give them their own citizenship to take them away out of the sphere of influence of that other country!
matrixmann: (Black suits comin')
Ihr beschwert euch, dass es nur noch um Emotionen geht und nicht mehr um faktische Wahrheiten? Ihr beklagt es, dass die Leute manipulierbar sind wie eine Viehherde und jedem Rattenfänger hinterherlaufen?
Werfe man die Frage mal auf euch zurück. Was macht ihr? "Symbolpolitik", "Leuchtturmprojekte", "Prestigeobjekte", "Spatenstiche", "große öffentliche Gedenkgottesdienste" - mit anderen Worten: Taten sind etwas anderes. Alles wird in die Ferne Zukunft geschoben. Möge sich bitte mein Nachfolger dieser Sache annehmen. Kopf in den Sand stecken und warten, bis dass sich die Sache von allein löst. Große Sprüche klopfen und mahnen vor Dingen, vor denen es nicht mehr zu mahnen gilt, weil diese schon längst Realität sind! Verurteilen von Dingen, bei denen man sich mit den Worthülsen den Arsch wischen kann, weil es stattdessen Handlungen braucht.
Eure Taten sprechen eine andere Sprache als die heiße Luft, die ihr täglich von euch gebt.
Nichts ist unter Kontrolle. Nichts habt ihr unter Kontrolle!
Die ganze Sache steigt euch langsam aufs Dach und ihr seid ratlos, was ihr dagegen tun könnt!
Der richtige Tropfen und das Fass beginnt entgültig überzulaufen - das Chaos fängt an, über euch hineinzubrechen!
Aber statt sich wenigstens damit zu befassen, irgendeine Form von Lösung zu finden, als alle einzusperren, zu erschießen oder ihre Existenzen zu vernichten - das Problem weiterhin unter den Teppich zu kehren -, tanzt ihr weiterhin auf der Bühne herum wie eine Marionette, die seinen Puppenspieler verloren hat. Planlos, ziellos, nichts wie weg von der Bühne! Das Stück improvisieren, sodass man es noch als "Vorstellung" vor dem Publikum verkaufen kann, damit sie einen nicht von der Bühne buhen und mit Tomaten bewerfen, merken, dass etwas nicht stimmt - das versucht ihr noch zu bewerkstelligen, weil euch keine andere Wahl bleibt, um noch möglichst unbeschadet aus der Situation herauszukommen, und genau darin seid ihr so mies wie Marionetten ohne Spieler hinter den Kulissen es nur sein können. Weil Marionetten keine eigene Intelligenz haben!
Ihr glaubt, dass das keiner mitkriegt - aber weit gefehlt! Die Meisten haben nur keine Worte, um es auf den Punkt zu bringen. Und in ihrer Suche nach Worten laufen sie allen möglichen Scharlatanen über den Weg. Gröhlen alle möglichen schrecklichen Parolen mit, die es nur gibt - die schon vor Jahrzehnten falsch waren und die es heute immer noch sind!

Das ist euer Werk, liebe Marionetten! Das ist die Realität, die ihr euch geschaffen habt!
Abbau von Idealen, von Schulbildung, von Zielen, der Aufbau von "jeder ist sich selbst der Nächste" und "du darfst alles machen, was du willst - du darfst dich nur nicht erwischen lassen, oder musst reich sein, um dich freizukaufen!" - das ist alles euer Werk und das eurer "Freunde"! Eure "Freunde", die als Wolf im Schafspelz daherkommen - die keine Freunde sind, die euch nur süßen Honig ums Maul schmieren, eine schöne Position versprechen, und euch zum Ausverkauf von allem nötigen, das eure sichere Lebensbasis darstellt; dass ihr noch jeden Tag Brot aus dem Laden oder nicht schon ein Messer in den Rücken kriegt, wenn ihr nur vor die Tür geht, weil alle nur noch mit Messern in den Taschen herumrennen und andere Leute ausrauben, die erkennbar Geld und Verwertbares in den Taschen haben!
Eure guten "Freunde" wollen euch nichts gutes - sie brauchen euch nur als Mittel zum Zweck! Um ihre eigenen Ziele verfolgen zu können. Und ihre Ziele sind: Die Welt auszubluten, bis kein Tröpfen Saft mehr aus ihr herauskommt!
Ihnen liegt nichts ferner, als an euer Wohlergehen und eure körperliche Sicherheit zu denken, so lang ihr ihnen nicht von praktischem Nutzen seid!
Ihr, liebe Marionetten, werdet genauso zwischen dem keifenden und kämpfenden Pöbel enden, wenn sich 100 Leute um die letzten verbliebenen 3 Brote im Regal streiten! Ihr werdet genauso um euer Überleben streiten müssen, wenn eure "Freunde" von Oben plötzlich meinen, sie müssten das Weite suchen! Ihr seid und bleibt einer von denjenigen, die sich nicht verpissen können, wenn sie nicht reich genug sind und zu der richtigen, angesehenen Sippschaft gehören, die diese Personen in ihren Reihen noch dulden!
Wer ein Palast hat, braucht Vasallen - aber er braucht keinen Palast voller Vasallen!
Denkt ihr wirklich, ihr seid Teil der Auserlesenen, denen es vergönnt ist, unter der Gnade dieser Geldadligen als treuer Diener noch seinen Lebensabend verbringen zu können?
Die Plätze sind schon längst reserviert. Diskretion ist das Credo. Und wer sich bereits in Diskretion bewiesen hat, der behält den Job. Alles andere wäre fahrlässig und ein Sicherheitsrisiko.
Hat euch das jemand schon mal so gesagt?
Die richtig Reichen und Einflussvollen denken in Strategie, sonst wären sie nicht so reich und sie würden es auch nicht bleiben. Sagt bloß, das habt ihr zwischen all eurem Verkehren, Abendessen, Gipfeltreffen und Galas nicht gemerkt?! Dann seid ihr noch dümmer als die dümmsten Marionetten - und diese werden auch nur an Strängen gezogen oder haben eine Hand im Arsch zu stecken!

"Wunderbar"! - Mit 180 und brüllendem Motor auf vollem Kollisionskurs gegen die Wand! Das ist, wovon jeder, der euch wählt, schon immer geträumt hat! Ein Spaß "für die ganze Familie"!



Disclaimer (Ablehnungshinweis): Jede Art von Unterstellung von Gewaltaufrufen gegen irgendwelche Personen, privat oder öffentlichen Interesses, die aus diesem Text in irgendjemandes Fantasie abgeleitet werden, werden als Verleumdung betrachtet. Das steht dort nicht und wird dort auch nie stehen!

Anmerkung: Dieser Text wurde noch vor den Ereignissen des 19. 12. in Berlin verfasst.
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
"Fuck your celebrating of the 80s and Neue Deutsche Welle over and over again - as one of the most decadent decades that one has seen recently! One day you gonna do it with this decade too because remembering one of any of the others would make people discover intelligence and education again!"
matrixmann: (Black suits comin')
Be aware of the techniques of infiltration and defamation.
When you start a new movement, be aware that there's already dozens of various interest groups at the initial starting blocks to subvert and corrupt your new creation.
The goal is the following: Taming it. Making it a controllable thing for those which you try to overcome.
If they don't get it one way, they try the other one.
One of both always works because of the ability of human weakness and because of human naivety.
Strategic thinking is the only thing that is your insurance against that - being aware of it and countering it as soon as you notice the first signs of it getting closer to you.
matrixmann: (Waiting for command)
Maybe there's a reason why the American establishment wants to colonize Mars so badly: If they can build themselves a shelter on a distant planet, maybe they think "oh, now we can make nuclear war as we want, we don't need to have consideration for anyone anymore - if we want something, we get that something by all means!".
They don't need to care about the destruction anymore, but about the business value.
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
"Your unconditional basic income is a nice idea, but here's the flaw in your system: It reestablishes how the old social benefits worked, but it doesn't change anything on the factor "prices". As well as that it doesn't change those facts that still each year it's the goal of all national economies to impress each other by proving how much percentage they can compile in attaching zeroes to the sums of the last year ( = GDP) and that the economy it ought to function in only can keep itself up by generating lots of fictional money that doesn't exist out of credits it didn't hand out to one customer, so it's whole self-asserted "growth" is nothing more than multiplying the sums that have originally been there before a few hundred, a few thousand years ago. In other terms: Not only you keep adjusting the sum each year, you also don't change anything that makes it so nessecary that this basic income needs to exist at all. You only make the circumstances takeable again. But that because you don't really know what you're trying to fight when you talk about "overcoming capitalism".
You're still one of those dreamy starry-eyed idealists that don't know how the world they live in really works."
matrixmann: (Thinking)
Perhaps a correction to this: https://matrixmann.dreamwidth.org/82348.html

These days' race still is like the old game the plebs against the upper class. The poor against the nobles.
The nobles always try to keep the pace with those from the lower class as this is the only thing that ensures them their privileges. And - they even dare to try to control the pace.
It's always the run who's the first. Whose way of life is gonna win and dominate the way of life the rest is going to live.
For these days, the nobles managed to apply all kinds of tricks and ways to lead the people from the lower class astray from the path that would lead them to be the first in that race.
First, one change over the centuries that happened is that everyone can be a noble, be one of their class. The nobles may not find it very pleasant, but it serves the purpose at least.
Through that, lots of people from the lower class get urged to make their efforts to move up to the upper class, so they are not busy with questioning at all why both classes got the wealth that they got.
And, secondary, so they become vulnerable to the dream of moving up the ladder.
The nobles don't want them within their ranks truly, but through the thought of maybe getting somewhere else, they become ready and willing to do a lot of things for the nobles in order to get a piece of the cake they can call their own from then. They become what you call "corrupted".
And so they keep delivering whatever the nobles want. Betraying their own class, living in the illusion in becoming part of something you were never meant to become part of, and they poison the thoughts of the next generation coming that wanted to do it better - seeing how much the previous one sold out their souls to the nobles' desires.
In fact they are... part of what tries to prevent that some others than the nobles are able to ever win the race.
Things remain as they are. The race remains at the same point before it started.
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
What you protesters need is new kinds and ways to show your protest, so that it impresses anyone at all of those you want to rally against.
You know what? In the last century the powerful still were afraid of it when crowds of people gathered in one spot to march along the streets or to occupy their place of current residence.
Today they close the venetian blinds and the problem is gone for them. As long as they're not close enough to the window to break in.
They know the public is not going to come in and demand for their heads.
They stand politely outside, according to the manners that they've been taught, they sing their songs, hold up their signs and go home again in the end. And if they don't, you got the police to carry them.
So - where's the fear factor? Where's the factor that those powerful people actually should even care to look at them? There is nothing in this that forces them. Politics of today go on tomorrow.
They sit safely in their ivory tower.
What have you won? In practice - nothing. So what do you cheer about every time? It's rather like you celebrate yourselves because from despair, because you need to tell your people they've done something of meaning while they have the constant impression like there's literally nothing in this world they do that has a meaning. But ain't that also part of the problem?
Those people you lead or call for gathering, the plague of their lives is experiencing, seeing that everything's made of pretending. And you keep blowing the same horn?
You betcha how much you are a criminal too in that terms and how much you actually know that if you are as intelligent as you try to act. If not - go back for a round in the school of life.
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
"Freedom" and "free travel" are just gifts to the young generation which don't know a world before this was visibly in effect, but they're just breadcrumbs to manipulate them, to get them in favor of that current system that reigns, to make them think if that is gone, they live in a dictatorship. Not even thirst, nor hunger, nor freezing, nor even finding any kind of clothes to keep you warm and protect you from bad weather should make them think they live in bad conditions, it should be that they can breathe no unfiltered air and that they can't spend money on whatever they want which they borrowed from banks anyway.
That way the system wants hold its position and even make sure that, if these young, spoiled and manipulated people that run aroud with twisted priorities in their heads don't get their will, they will become aggressive to take their will from anyone they perceive as standing in their way to get it. And that makes them vulnerable to extremist ideas to even kill people if only they get from the act what they wanted in the first place.
matrixmann: (Wasteland Ranger)
...die Leute sollen sich wieder einen Lebensmittelvorrat für ca. 10 Tage und Trinkwasser für mindestens 5 Tage zulegen. Inklusive die staatlichen und allgemeinen übergeordneten Strukturen sollen sich ebenfalls höhere Kapazitäten und Vorkehrungen für den Notfall zulegen.

Ist das wieder die reine Angstmache vor der russischen Förderation oder hat dort jemand etwas vor?
Oder hört dort jemand das Ende seiner Versorgungsstrukturen läuten?
matrixmann: (Ready)
Führerscheinentzug für nicht gezahlten (Kindes-)Unterhalt und andere Delikte, die überhaupt nichts mit jemandes Fahrtauglichkeit zu tun haben - wisst ihr was das ist? Daumenschraube.
Es soll sie niemand mehr einen Fehltritt erlauben, sonst könnte es für ihn den Einstieg in den Ruin bedeuten. Für die Meisten bedeutet Führerscheinentzug zeitgleich auch den Verlust des Arbeitsplatzes - Verlust des Arbeitsplatzes durch mutwilliges Handeln, bringt einem kein Hartz IV ein; wenn man also nicht gerade jemanden kennt, der einen durchfüttert oder Geld leiht, oder der für einen mitarbeitet (was Partner in der Regel tun), bedeutet das herbe Einschnitte. Eine herbe Kettenreaktion.
An solchen finanziellen Dramen sind schon ganze Familien zerbrochen.
Ganz zu schweigen davon, dass man durch den Entzug in seiner Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, in seiner Chance, von einem anderen Arbeitgeber angestellt zu werden, merklich beeinträchtigt ist, weil eine Erlaubnis, ein Kraftfahrzeug zu fahren, heutzutage schon dermaßen zu einer Standardvoraussetzung geworden ist wie ein Schulabschluss.
Niemand wird also versuchen, diese Kette in Gang zu werfen - es tunlichst vermeiden.
matrixmann: (I see with the eyes of a hunter)
Lobby groups - grassroots - enterprises - paid suit whores - it's hard to tell the truth between all these things. Everyone works for the well-being of his interests. Even those ones which tell you all the time they want to do something for you. And they grab all nessecary means what it takes to get their interests realized. Be it a group that commits itself to refugees or that campaigns against them - where do you wanna know from if not on both sides money-heavy interest groups stand and want to get their will? Where do you wanna know from if it's a conspiracy theory?
The world is not seperated in angels and devils. Everyone's got his dots on the vest.
All like to make money out of you. They all like to make some profit out of you which gives them power over a part of the world.
It's not like capitalistic habits made their way around civil rights advocacy groups.

Over

17 May 2016 05:36 pm
matrixmann: (Yuber Suikoden I)
One thing everyone needs to be ready for: If you tear down the current system, it means your current state of wealth is going to vanish too. The gadgets, the electronic devices, the oversupply that you use - is tied to the current economic and political system. If you make it go away, these things only keep existing as a remembrance of different times. There are no more of these things getting produced, the food chain needs to be rebuild from the basic local infrastructure.
There are going to be times of shortages and deprivation again over a certain amount of time.

Toy

13 April 2016 07:39 pm
matrixmann: (Wasteland Ranger)
Addition to this thread of thought: https://matrixmann.dreamwidth.org/78270.html

It needs to be expressed as evilly as the circumstance is in fact: On one hand, it gets condemned if far right activists drag their kids to their rallies and make them scream hatespeech paroles that they fail to understand, but on another hand it is attributed to be "good" if social-democrat leftist activists drag their entourage to their rallies and it is considered to be "well for the development of children's moral and their understanding of values". Even though you can guess, they fail to understand these paroles as well because of their age.

On another note to the subject - everyone who has a basic instinct of empathy knows you never use violence in front of kids. It's like a natural law that the majority of people gets it is extremely harmful for them to be victim, involved or witness to it.
As much as mankind is an animal species that tends to be egoistic and sneaky if only an action brings them closer to a goal they want to achieve, you will know you can also abuse this circumstance.
That's also why you don't carry children to rallies.

Fight for your own crap, but don't use your children as a protective shield!
You're as shameful as somebody who uses children for his personal amusement.

July 2017

M T W T F S S
     1 2
34 56 78 9
1011 1213 1415 16
17 1819 2021 22 23
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Statistics


Free counters!

Free counters!
Page generated 25 July 2017 08:45 am