Good luck once again. Just to be clear I stick to the most progressive materialistic theory of how society develops and the reactionary bourgeois anthropologist with idealistic views and inconsistent results can go and f...themselves. There is a reason nobody heard of Margaret Meade and almost everyone at least fairly educated heard of Marx. Most are reluctant to grab and study his very consistent and deeply scientific theory. Nough said. If somebody wants to be idealist I don't care, I am not here to argue.
Ps This is mostly to the comment below. But I do agree with you.