You see, I even don't deny that things that this mindset addresses aren't factually there. But, the way to interpret it, the kind of... pulling strings together and see the pattern behind them, what links all of them together, THAT seems like totally wrong to me. Drawing the wrong conclusions, you know? It seems so incredibly biased with something and, on the other hand, like a totally manipulated way to put all these things into a context. Overall: Very much complacent. Circling around oneself and one's ego totally...
Understanding sociology, you know that's not the way the correlations are tied together. Links don't ask for either male or female, black or white, they're just about individuals, about single entities taking one turnout or another or another. The judgment about them at all is neutral, from the viewpoint of this network. This is a thing these people already aren't - for whatever reason.
For example, sociology, as well as psychology too, already know that individual resources are the main deciding factor over one's fortune in the future. You can also subcategorize this into outer and inner resources. Outer are circumstances which come from the outside, which you have no or limited influence on, inner circumstances are what your own efforts make out of that what you're given with. You know, it's very much a difference if you grew up in a loving home or an abusive one, if you received proper nutrition throughout the build-up time, if you had the access to resources providing education (school, but also books at home), if you had access to resources at all which fostered your psychical and cognitive development, if you grew up in a war zone or in safety, if you grew up with 2 people acting in mother and father roles or only one of them, if you grew up in good relationship to your body or not, even if you grew up with siblings or not and the relationship to them and so and so on. So, where do these individual resources contain "race"? Where does that play a role here? Race itself isn't the deciding factor, it's more how your surroundings treat that, give it positive or negative judgment and how much that is responsible for troubles your surroundings have during influencing you in childhood. Race itself doesn't matter that much if you grow up in surroundings that are wealthy, for example. Wealthy suburbs don't function like precarious ghettos or single-moms with 6 children and each of their fathers having run away, for example... "Gender" is a thing that appears in this if the same like for race applies to it. If people in your surroundings judge negatively over it (like "oh, no, it's a girl/boy! I wanted a son/daughter!"). Or, the other thing, if you were always caught up in the mindset that the physics you have are wrong and how people treat you, deducing from that, is wrong. You want the social treatment of the other side. Still then, beside this conflict, it doesn't limit you fully in your mental development, to acquire skills and such things. Or even to become successful and rich! There are many people with that problem, but who become someone before they take it on. So, where are these single components fucking up a life? Also - once your physical appearance had been adapted, some troubles with your environment also should disappear. Except if you make it a topic yourself again and again or try to live as some non-categorizable artistic figure...
So, where is all this fucking pre-set? Where does all of this originate from a single component called "flesh"? Where are humans ONLY the flesh they were born with - and where do they have no space to move on their own? It's total nonsense... Some reactionary bullshit in order to justify one's own bad decisions and avoid assuming responsibility for them...
no subject
But, the way to interpret it, the kind of... pulling strings together and see the pattern behind them, what links all of them together, THAT seems like totally wrong to me. Drawing the wrong conclusions, you know?
It seems so incredibly biased with something and, on the other hand, like a totally manipulated way to put all these things into a context. Overall: Very much complacent. Circling around oneself and one's ego totally...
Understanding sociology, you know that's not the way the correlations are tied together. Links don't ask for either male or female, black or white, they're just about individuals, about single entities taking one turnout or another or another. The judgment about them at all is neutral, from the viewpoint of this network.
This is a thing these people already aren't - for whatever reason.
For example, sociology, as well as psychology too, already know that individual resources are the main deciding factor over one's fortune in the future. You can also subcategorize this into outer and inner resources.
Outer are circumstances which come from the outside, which you have no or limited influence on, inner circumstances are what your own efforts make out of that what you're given with.
You know, it's very much a difference if you grew up in a loving home or an abusive one, if you received proper nutrition throughout the build-up time, if you had the access to resources providing education (school, but also books at home), if you had access to resources at all which fostered your psychical and cognitive development, if you grew up in a war zone or in safety, if you grew up with 2 people acting in mother and father roles or only one of them, if you grew up in good relationship to your body or not, even if you grew up with siblings or not and the relationship to them and so and so on.
So, where do these individual resources contain "race"? Where does that play a role here? Race itself isn't the deciding factor, it's more how your surroundings treat that, give it positive or negative judgment and how much that is responsible for troubles your surroundings have during influencing you in childhood. Race itself doesn't matter that much if you grow up in surroundings that are wealthy, for example. Wealthy suburbs don't function like precarious ghettos or single-moms with 6 children and each of their fathers having run away, for example...
"Gender" is a thing that appears in this if the same like for race applies to it. If people in your surroundings judge negatively over it (like "oh, no, it's a girl/boy! I wanted a son/daughter!").
Or, the other thing, if you were always caught up in the mindset that the physics you have are wrong and how people treat you, deducing from that, is wrong. You want the social treatment of the other side.
Still then, beside this conflict, it doesn't limit you fully in your mental development, to acquire skills and such things. Or even to become successful and rich!
There are many people with that problem, but who become someone before they take it on.
So, where are these single components fucking up a life?
Also - once your physical appearance had been adapted, some troubles with your environment also should disappear.
Except if you make it a topic yourself again and again or try to live as some non-categorizable artistic figure...
So, where is all this fucking pre-set? Where does all of this originate from a single component called "flesh"? Where are humans ONLY the flesh they were born with - and where do they have no space to move on their own?
It's total nonsense... Some reactionary bullshit in order to justify one's own bad decisions and avoid assuming responsibility for them...