matrixmann: (Standing one's ground)
matrixmann ([personal profile] matrixmann) wrote 2022-08-11 11:01 pm (UTC)

"Are the green technologies a myth which Americans had put at our – European corrupted mass media - to force our politicians to harm our energy independence and hence to harm our industries "

Here you'll have to disginuish again between matter itself and between the agitprop the capitalist system makes out of it.
First, the energy consumption of the humans can't go on like before, otherwise they'll make the planet as unlively for all other creatures and that it could even lead to mankind itself dying out.
Only I fear, it may already be much too late with this large human world population - because you can't tell China, India, Africa and Russia now, after centuries of plundering the world, that they get no turn to do that themselves.
But just the imagination of China and Africa making it to acquire a wealthy lifestyle near the known Western one, it's gonna be the overkill for the world climate as we know it because the mass of people in those two parts of the world are a couple of times larger than just Europe and North America.
So you can fasten your seatbelt how devastating it's going to be if that mass of people wants to live wasteful lifestyle - on top of what the plundering of the Western world already did to the global nature...

And second - well, if your mind has been formed by a household consisting of different types of technicians, guess what you'll do whenever some ads and stupid talking of people tries to suggest you "new eco-friendly technology"?
Of course, you logically check if that's actually the case.
And with much of the so-called "green technologies", I see that it's simply an exchange for using and consuming different resources than before - with the tendency to use up even more and more dirty technologies than before.
For example: One could cheer about "electric mobility", if it wouldn't mean to produce tons of new cars, each equipped with a battery that maybe lasts for a couple of years and then you'd have to exchange it. Producing new trash toxic to the environment.
The biggest joke in it, I found, was: Busses with batteries.
Hell! People, there already is an existing invention where a bus is driven purely by electric energy. It's called "trolleybus". The bus is constantly plugged in to the socket like an electric locomotive.
Its range of usage my be limited, but this type is way more eco-friendly since you don't need any battery that weighs a ton and can't be recycled.
And, instead of strengthening the individual traffic again by just throwing new cars on the market, just fucking strengthen the conventional mass transportation again (preferably the railroad) because here also exists and invention that can drive by electric energy. It's called the "electric locomotive". Also gets along without a battery, can drive because of being plugged in to the socket all the time.
All those technologies are already known and beta-tested over decades... So there'd be no evil surprises possible to come with these. And they get along with lesser usage of natural resources like rare earths.
Why isn't this focused on and instead a reinvented wheel is being presented? Well, for sure because someone wants to make a sweet profit again by producing and selling all these batteries.

And Western Greens, rooted down mostly in social sciences at university, but no technical subjects or occupations, are that stupid to buy this shit. They buy this shit in the ads of the industry.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org