The argument of having no trouble seems the most reasonable.
The thing about order, as mankind knows it, is: It's created mostly by humans. Words like "duty" and "justice" - the ideals behind only exist in human order (and in the one of other creatures which rise to a certain point of standard of social and intellectual intelligence). But they don't exist in nature. So, when rules only have a meaning if you live in society, nature doesn't care, and rules can be bend by time, place and individuals carrying them out, so which universal value do they have at all? (Take the hint of the text above, which tries to state rules don't work (anymore) as they were intended.)
no subject
The thing about order, as mankind knows it, is: It's created mostly by humans. Words like "duty" and "justice" - the ideals behind only exist in human order (and in the one of other creatures which rise to a certain point of standard of social and intellectual intelligence). But they don't exist in nature.
So, when rules only have a meaning if you live in society, nature doesn't care, and rules can be bend by time, place and individuals carrying them out, so which universal value do they have at all? (Take the hint of the text above, which tries to state rules don't work (anymore) as they were intended.)