I think that protest culture and American 'egoculture' is not trouble for modern society. I see another dangerous process: total unification of western societies masked as 'protest liberation against all' and 'freedom of private exceptionalism'('multi-kulti'/sexual liberation/rejecting of sovereign nation state etc.). Pseudoliberalism/pseudomarxism/pseudoindividualism is disguise for new global totalitarianism of international capital community which provides by corrupted western governments. For example, multi-culti says that every culture is treasure, but in reality it force/inflict LGBT for muslims ('euroislam') etc. We all now are looking new society generation process: antisocial society in which everyone fear everyone, and humans lives like animal packs (with hi-tec industry, power intellegiences, oppressions etc.)
Little part of lefts recognise it. True left must to combine social and national (some Ukrainian nationalist did it, but it is another conversation).
It is no trouble anymore because society is already shaped that way that they don't feel it as a problem - is what I would say.
I don't have anything against some milestones put into other cultures and bringing something that is useful, that creates relief for a part of that society and which enforces the "live and let live"-maxime. Say, what harm does it if your son or daughter are into the own gender? Is it your only child? No, it isn't, so there's no trouble for your family continuing to exist. Somebody else will have the kids. But, what I understand can't be, is: You can't run a society based on people which are unreliable, which like to be silly all day, dress up fancy and that's all they gifted for to do. You can even transport this upon people which are not part of the LBGT community. Society depends on people which work on the fields and which go to the factories to produce the stuff that society likes to play with. Where should it drop from otherwise?
But maybe that is also only my thinking. In that sense I even realize "liberal" people to be bigoted, they can't distinguish between being gay and being a clown, between being multi-cultural and tolerant and allowing chaos to be legal, and they're afraid of communism which they never experienced themselves and which they only know Western myths of. At least in true communism, nationalism, patriotism and being social to your own people doesn't make out an ideological contradiction. Communists were always fighters for their own nations, but no voluntary workers for the people with the big purses (involuntary because of the needs of financially running a state and Western banks tried to boycot states that took such a path).
no subject
We all now are looking new society generation process: antisocial society in which everyone fear everyone, and humans lives like animal packs (with hi-tec industry, power intellegiences, oppressions etc.)
Little part of lefts recognise it. True left must to combine social and national (some Ukrainian nationalist did it, but it is another conversation).
no subject
I don't have anything against some milestones put into other cultures and bringing something that is useful, that creates relief for a part of that society and which enforces the "live and let live"-maxime. Say, what harm does it if your son or daughter are into the own gender? Is it your only child? No, it isn't, so there's no trouble for your family continuing to exist. Somebody else will have the kids.
But, what I understand can't be, is: You can't run a society based on people which are unreliable, which like to be silly all day, dress up fancy and that's all they gifted for to do.
You can even transport this upon people which are not part of the LBGT community.
Society depends on people which work on the fields and which go to the factories to produce the stuff that society likes to play with. Where should it drop from otherwise?
But maybe that is also only my thinking.
In that sense I even realize "liberal" people to be bigoted, they can't distinguish between being gay and being a clown, between being multi-cultural and tolerant and allowing chaos to be legal, and they're afraid of communism which they never experienced themselves and which they only know Western myths of.
At least in true communism, nationalism, patriotism and being social to your own people doesn't make out an ideological contradiction. Communists were always fighters for their own nations, but no voluntary workers for the people with the big purses (involuntary because of the needs of financially running a state and Western banks tried to boycot states that took such a path).