Yes, Europe has robbed by itself without intruders) And for German there are not perspectives if it will not turn to national customs. Its true for Russia too
What I've come to realize and to dislike is how much not only culture, but also protest culture, civil activism, racism- and LBGT-activism has taken the the forms and shapes that are common overseas. A popular sentence that I have on my lips surely is "The left in Germany has turned into a cowardly left just like what they think leftism is like in the United States - human chains, colorful balloons and painting signs is going to save the world; refugees are all virtuous; women can't commit a crime; and being LBGT is running around like a parrot, who doesn't find that okay is a sexist and homophobic." In English I don't even find a proper word for that culture, "cowardice" is by far the best, but I find it doesn't have the intensity than the German one I use ("Sitzpisser"). In that sense I can even support the term how it perhaps is expressed in Russia "United States - imposters, gangsters, religious fanatics, narcississts and murderers founded a country and this is it" - because that kind of culture, it's all about ego. It's all about being egoistic and forcing your lifestyle upon everyone and everyone ought to say no word against it. Highly damaging to which rules society actually is made of. Society is a product of compromise. It's not like saying all of this activism in the past hadn't been due or nessecary or justified, but during these days it starts to run into that direction to install everyone's private exceptionalism and why everyone else around is supposed to shut his mouth over critic when exposing this all day in public is the only thing some people "contribute" to society.
I think that protest culture and American 'egoculture' is not trouble for modern society. I see another dangerous process: total unification of western societies masked as 'protest liberation against all' and 'freedom of private exceptionalism'('multi-kulti'/sexual liberation/rejecting of sovereign nation state etc.). Pseudoliberalism/pseudomarxism/pseudoindividualism is disguise for new global totalitarianism of international capital community which provides by corrupted western governments. For example, multi-culti says that every culture is treasure, but in reality it force/inflict LGBT for muslims ('euroislam') etc. We all now are looking new society generation process: antisocial society in which everyone fear everyone, and humans lives like animal packs (with hi-tec industry, power intellegiences, oppressions etc.)
Little part of lefts recognise it. True left must to combine social and national (some Ukrainian nationalist did it, but it is another conversation).
It is no trouble anymore because society is already shaped that way that they don't feel it as a problem - is what I would say.
I don't have anything against some milestones put into other cultures and bringing something that is useful, that creates relief for a part of that society and which enforces the "live and let live"-maxime. Say, what harm does it if your son or daughter are into the own gender? Is it your only child? No, it isn't, so there's no trouble for your family continuing to exist. Somebody else will have the kids. But, what I understand can't be, is: You can't run a society based on people which are unreliable, which like to be silly all day, dress up fancy and that's all they gifted for to do. You can even transport this upon people which are not part of the LBGT community. Society depends on people which work on the fields and which go to the factories to produce the stuff that society likes to play with. Where should it drop from otherwise?
But maybe that is also only my thinking. In that sense I even realize "liberal" people to be bigoted, they can't distinguish between being gay and being a clown, between being multi-cultural and tolerant and allowing chaos to be legal, and they're afraid of communism which they never experienced themselves and which they only know Western myths of. At least in true communism, nationalism, patriotism and being social to your own people doesn't make out an ideological contradiction. Communists were always fighters for their own nations, but no voluntary workers for the people with the big purses (involuntary because of the needs of financially running a state and Western banks tried to boycot states that took such a path).
(no subject)
Date: 11 December 2015 10:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 11 December 2015 01:22 pm (UTC)In English I don't even find a proper word for that culture, "cowardice" is by far the best, but I find it doesn't have the intensity than the German one I use ("Sitzpisser").
In that sense I can even support the term how it perhaps is expressed in Russia "United States - imposters, gangsters, religious fanatics, narcississts and murderers founded a country and this is it" - because that kind of culture, it's all about ego. It's all about being egoistic and forcing your lifestyle upon everyone and everyone ought to say no word against it.
Highly damaging to which rules society actually is made of. Society is a product of compromise.
It's not like saying all of this activism in the past hadn't been due or nessecary or justified, but during these days it starts to run into that direction to install everyone's private exceptionalism and why everyone else around is supposed to shut his mouth over critic when exposing this all day in public is the only thing some people "contribute" to society.
I hope this was written understandably.
(no subject)
Date: 12 December 2015 02:44 pm (UTC)We all now are looking new society generation process: antisocial society in which everyone fear everyone, and humans lives like animal packs (with hi-tec industry, power intellegiences, oppressions etc.)
Little part of lefts recognise it. True left must to combine social and national (some Ukrainian nationalist did it, but it is another conversation).
(no subject)
Date: 12 December 2015 08:21 pm (UTC)I don't have anything against some milestones put into other cultures and bringing something that is useful, that creates relief for a part of that society and which enforces the "live and let live"-maxime. Say, what harm does it if your son or daughter are into the own gender? Is it your only child? No, it isn't, so there's no trouble for your family continuing to exist. Somebody else will have the kids.
But, what I understand can't be, is: You can't run a society based on people which are unreliable, which like to be silly all day, dress up fancy and that's all they gifted for to do.
You can even transport this upon people which are not part of the LBGT community.
Society depends on people which work on the fields and which go to the factories to produce the stuff that society likes to play with. Where should it drop from otherwise?
But maybe that is also only my thinking.
In that sense I even realize "liberal" people to be bigoted, they can't distinguish between being gay and being a clown, between being multi-cultural and tolerant and allowing chaos to be legal, and they're afraid of communism which they never experienced themselves and which they only know Western myths of.
At least in true communism, nationalism, patriotism and being social to your own people doesn't make out an ideological contradiction. Communists were always fighters for their own nations, but no voluntary workers for the people with the big purses (involuntary because of the needs of financially running a state and Western banks tried to boycot states that took such a path).