matrixmann: Determined (Yuber Suikoden I)
Bauernproteste, Proteste aus der Logistikbranche (vom kleinsten Lieferfahrzeug bis zum Vierzigtonner), Jäger, Handwerker, Ärzte, Apotheken, Pflegekräfte - anstatt ständig seine Wähler zu bepöbeln und sie pauschal als "rechts" zu beschimpfen, sie infantil wie kleine Kinder zu behandeln, die zu dumm sind, etwas zu verstehen ("wir haben wohl nicht richtig kommuniziert"), und ihnen auch noch überzogene Anzeigen für deren Ausdruck des Protests anzuheften (Wenn also schon eine Ampelanlage in der Seilschlinge eines Galgens abstrakt als eine Art Morddrohung gedeutet wird, wie darf man denn überhaupt noch seinen Unmut und seinem Zorn Ausdruck verleihen, wenn einem die aktuellen Regierenden die Existenz und die Zukunft zerstören? Wie hätte die Regierung es denn gern?), sollte diese Regierung sich mal ernsthafte Gedanken darüber machen, WARUM alle auf sie dermaßen sauer sind. WARUM sich so viele wünschen, dass sie gehen sollen.

Wer ständig sein Publikum beschimpft, offenkundig für dumm hält und wo die einen begleitende Presse so gut wie nur noch Schönmalerei der aktuellen Politik bzw. Politiker verbreitet (während sie gleichzeitig ebenfalls die Funktion des Organs zur Beschimpfung aller Andersdenkenden ausfüllt), der braucht sich nicht zu wundern, dass eben dieses einem irgendwann den Rücken kehrt und keine Karten für die Vorstellung mehr kauft.

Gar nicht zu sprechen davon, dass von der eigenen Hand dümmlichste und dreisteste Fehler und Unsitten begangen werden, welche dann hinterher noch nicht einmal eingeräumt werden - egal, ob alle es gesehen haben, viele es erkennen und eigentlich kein Weg mehr daran vorbeiführt, sie zuzugeben, wenn man mit seinem Gesicht auch noch auf irgendeiner Bühne jemals wieder auftreten möchte.

In der freien Wirtschaft könnte sich so ein Verhalten kein Unternehmen für einen so langen Zeitraum erlauben wie es die Poltik seit Jahren tut (beginnend auch schon unter der offiziell gern verehrten und gelobten Frau Merkel).
matrixmann: Irgendwas ist hier gründlich schiefgelaufen... (Something's happened here...)
Da hat sich die Ampelregierung aber in einen Schlamassel geritten mit ihrem Nachtragshaushalt für 2021, wo sie nicht genutzte Corona-Gelder für einen anderen Zweck verwenden wollten...
60 Milliarden für dieses Jahr, von denen keiner weiß, wo die auf einmal herkommen sollen.

Bei Monopoly nennt man das "pleite".

Und es ist nicht so, als hätten nicht bereits vorher andere Bedenken angemeldet, bezüglich der Verfassungsgemäßheit.
Da wollte die Ampelregierung - ganz amateurhaft - mit dem Brecheisen etwas durchsetzen, und ist nun aufgelaufen, da man so nicht Politik macht. - Dass es vorgefasste Regeln gibt, an die man sich zu halten hat, und man diese nicht nach Belieben jedes Mal ändern kann wie es einem gefällt. (Und das von Leuten, die jedes Mal auf das Grundgesetz schwören, wenn es immer um bestimmte Themen geht - proklamierend und so tuend, als wenn dieses wie eine heilige Schrift ist. - Unantastbar, das Beste, was sich Menschenköpfe jemals ausdenken konnten, und wehe dem, der nicht daran glaubt oder Zweifel an ihm kriegt.)

Asyl

9 October 2023 10:03 pm
matrixmann: Perceiving a grain of sand in the desert (I see with the eyes of a hunter)
Wenn sich eines über das deutsche Asylsystem relativ sicher sagen lässt, ist es das Folgende:

Es kommt nicht damit zurecht, wenn zu viele Antragssteller auf einmal da sind.

Es funktioniert nur gut, wenn sich die Antragssteller noch da befinden, wo sie sind, und das Territorum der BRD nur betreten, wenn sie die Genehmigung dafür erhalten haben.
Wenn, polemisch formuliert, der Amtsschimmel es sich einteilen und aussuchen kann wie viele Anträge er in einem bestimmten vorgegebenen Zeitraum (pro Tag, pro Woche oder pro Monat) bearbeitet kriegt.

Stehen die Antragssteller am Grenzzaun und drängen auf ihre Einreise oder halten sich bereits auf dem Gebiet der BRD auf, und sind dazu auch noch sehr zahlreich (und jeden Tag kommen neue Antragssteller hinzu, in ähnlicher Menge wie am Vortag), kommt die deutsche Bürokratie mit der Bearbeitung der Fälle überhaupt nicht hinterher.
Ist sie hoffnungslos überlastet und das System wie gelähmt.
matrixmann: (Standing one's ground)
In the light of today as the topic of “negotiations” is continuously being wiped off the table with arguments like “Putin started this war” and “Why should Ukraine aspire surrender while they’ve been attacked?” - let’s recall why negotiations are held at all in war scenarios.

When do officials and representatives hold them with representatives of the opponent?
Huh?
First and foremost, it’s not a question of giving up immaterial “values” and virtues” that one side thinks to have on its side - it’s not a question of ideology and idealism.
Plainly, it’s a matter of pragmatism.

Negotiations over truces and “peace” are being held if one side recognizes that it’s about to lose and being crushed, so the smarter people among the state officials figure they’ll be better off stopping to try to win the war by force and rather try to save the slice of the cake that they still have under their control instead of eventually maybe ending up with none of it.

The essence of sitting down to hold negotiations is not surrendering and handing everything over to the enemy that it wants, but more than that securing some little bits of what one still has instead of losing everything and then depending on the arbitrariness or mercy of the winning opponent what few bread crumbs will be granted to oneself.

You practically do that by trying to find things to offer to the enemy fraction for which it shows itself willing to give up the demands for another item. And you do that up until the enemy fraction becomes content and leaves again.

It’s no different than negotiating a price in a handshake deal.
A buyer has interest in obtaining a particular item, the seller tells you the price, but the buyer doesn’t have enough money or doesn’t want to pay that much, so it needs to approach the seller and see if they are hardened in their stance or if there’s some room that can be debated over.

In that case, it’s “only” that the item that you want to buy is “peace” - or at least a truce so that the fighting and the destruction stops.

Negotiating is a tactic that is known in wars and armed conflicts for centuries. As old as such scenarios.

So this isn’t like an “absolutely crazy idea” in this conflict.
Rather it should be asked: What speaks objectively so much against it?

(Unless the explanation is that there are very stubborn humans involved in this specific case that are occupied by ideology and emotional biases who have a very distorted understanding about war at all - that all that there is to obtain is winning, like in a manic fanatic attitude heading for a crusade, heading towards total war, not just mere self-defense.)
matrixmann: (Standing one's ground)
In your own interest, trans folks: By taking transsexuality out of the corner of “disease” and making it an apparent lifestyle decision, as the scene lobby and social activism enforce it since the past few years, they also erase it from the catalogue of medical conditions which health insurance needs or has to assist you with.
Health insurance and what it pays for doesn’t exist for realizing castles in the sky or personal esthetics, it exists to pay for the crap you are or get sick with.
So with it “being no medical condition anymore”, what reason does the insurance have to pay for all the expensive physical modifications, operations and the lifelong hormones you have to take?

Think about it. How many trans folks around the world without a high-paying job would be left alone in their lifelong misery - with no financial support to be made possible for them?

Wouldn’t it be better to invest one’s powers into giving that “disease” its more suitable place? To get it inserted in between all the other intersex conditions which people get born with without asking for it and which they carry no personal blame for?

It’s no sin to be permanently physically sick. How many people throughout the world are with anything else and are in need of meds or medical treatments?

Or is it that you can’t bear the truth that something is broken with your body? Do you fail to pluck up the courage to claim the medical treatment from the medicine sector that you rightfully need and deserve with a physical defect?

Okay, in case you don’t want to hear it: Being trans is forever. Being trans requires lifelong substitution of artificial hormones (if you go all the complete way). Being trans leads to operations, whose scars and impacts you gonna feel on your shell for the rest of your life.
Being trans and being treated medically also may lead to other imbalances in the hormonal balance.
And being trans requires to be under medical surveillance for the rest of your life.

Your whole existence and medical treatment for it is a weighing of “What is the greater and the smaller evil of all options?”.

So, say... what makes it honestly different from a “simple” chronic disease?
You’ve got to treat it like that anyway...

...If you get to make the turn of a “mental disorder” to a chronic physical disease, everyone gets to keep its possibilities to get help from a health system (if one exists in your country). Each poor trans folk can still get its treatment paid if he/she has no money themselves.
And you can also be treated accordingly to your physical features and missing things in a hospital or other institutions where segregation according to sex is common/necessary.
Because it’s noted down in your official health record that you’re chronically sick with a certain diagnosis whose outlines are firmly defined.

Can’t you claim your rights for medical treatment and bureaucratic changes of your official persona way better with that than with the tag “medically insane - too insane to be cured”?
And couldn’t certain stigmata regarding the issue “this mental insanity gets rewarded and assisted - while somebody who thinks he’s Jesus gets sent to a mental hospital until he can think clearly again” be shaken off with that? Huh?
matrixmann: (Black suits comin')
Eine der sinnlosesten und kurzlebigsten Arten von Verschwendung von Ressourcen: Wahlplakate!


One of the most senseless and short-lived types of wasting natural resources: Election posters!

Sly kids

2 April 2021 09:00 pm
matrixmann: (Dark (1))
Children understand if a protection system works to their advantage against adults.
Those who grow up in misery learn to not turn to them or that they won’t be believed anyway.
But those who grow up in ordinary circumstances - they develop understanding as well as will to make that useable for them in their favor. They can downright turn into Eric Cartman from South Park and try to enforce getting his Xbox back when their mother has taken it from them in order for justified scolding, staging it like a critical “violation of human rights”.

Kids like that tend to never grow up and not learn to respect boundaries.
Their whole world keeps spinning around their single ego.
matrixmann: (Dark (1))
Just as predicted: Just as the year starts to take off, it goes on with Covid-19 as the last one ended and it makes you continuously think "Fuck all this shit! I've had enough of it!" as soon as the next crap gets agreed upon by your government (that, on top, reigns without the parliaments for about a year now and there is no problem in the courts with that)...

Seriously, slowly but surely, it gets on your nerves because you can't recognize neither a consistent concept, nor a strategy anymore. It only appears like watching the administration of sheer helplessness.
matrixmann: Determined (Yuber Suikoden I)
Mit der Idee aus Sachsen, einen Bewegungsradius zu erlassen, innerhalb dessen sich die Leute von ihrem Wohnort nur noch entfernen dürfen (außer für Arztbesuche und Schuften) - damit hat man in Berlin wieder ein gefundenes Fressen gefunden...
Nachdem es sichtbar wurde, dass die Ausgangssperren, wo sie erlassen wurden, gar nicht so viel gebracht haben und in bestimmten Gebieten nutzlos sind, weil dort eh abends nach neun nichts mehr los ist (und zudem zur Zeit alles geschlossen ist, wo man hingehen könnte, um sich außer Haus zu vergnügen), hat man nun in seiner Verzweiflung auf der Suche nach neuen Ideen wie man seine Infektionszahlen noch senken könnte, wenn diese nicht wollen, ein Modell entdeckt, was andere schon seit Wochen praktizieren, wovon man scheinbar in der Hauptstadt und im Kanzleramt bisher noch nichts gehört hatte.
Und prompt musste man zuschnappen - diesen Stohhalm aufheben und ihn gleich zum festen Bestandteil der neuen Verordnungen machen. Entgegen jeglicher Prüfung, ob das überall überhaupt praktisch durchführbar wäre...

Man kann nur eines in diesem Zusammenhang immer wieder festhalten: So gut wie kein Entscheidungsträger in Berlin oder den jeweiligen Landesregierungen scheint mehr auf dem Lande zu wohnen, sonst wüssten sie nämlich, dass 15 Kilometer als Bewegungsradius auch mal schnell ausgefüllt sein können - und man hat immer noch nicht das Ziel erreicht, wohin man will oder muss.

Auch ist hier allmählich mal sehr kritisch anzumerken: Jegliche Form von Vergnügen und Ausgang wird dicht gemacht oder untersagt, aber im Namen der Arbeit oder darf man immer noch fast schon unbegrenzt durch die Gegend pendeln.
Wenn man nicht gerade Angestellter bei einem der Einzelhandelsgeschäfte ist, die derzeit geschlossen bleiben müssen, oder zu einem anderen Unternehmen gehört, was durch die durch Corona verursachte Wirtschaftskrise seine Arbeiter in Kurzarbeit nach Hause schicken oder gar entlassen musste, gibt es keine Einschränkungen, was das tägliche Schuften angeht. - Obwohl einem niemand erzählen kann, dass es jetzt noch notwendig ist, zum Beispiel Autos zu produzieren.
In den Autohäusern der Republik stehen so viele fertig produzierte Wagen herum, die man kaufen könnte (inklusive Gebrauchtwagen) - man könnte sich buchstäblich damit gegenseitig bewerfen.
Wo sind mal die Beschränkungen für die Großindustrie, die zur Zeit eh kaum Waren absetzen dürfte?
Und das obwohl selbst schon offiziell vom RKI der Arbeitsplatz als eine der Hauptquellen für Infektionen ausgemacht wurde (zu Zeiten als man die Infektionen noch nachvollziehen konnte)!

Es mutet geradezu bizarr an angesichts dessen, dass nahezu alle kleinen Innenstadtgeschäfte per Dekret geschlossen wurden, dass selbst Haare schneiden lassen schon wieder zu viel ist und dass man privat wieder nicht mehr als eine haushaltsfremde Person treffen soll, weil alles angeblich „so gefährlich“ ist, und die Großindustrie hingegen nach wie vor in keinster Weise reguliert oder beschränkt wird.
Wie eine sexuell aktive Frau, die nicht verhütet, die ständig mit irgendeinem Mann schläft, irgendwann plötzlich im Bereich des Bauches kontinuierlich dicker wird, ihre Monatsblutung bleibt aus, aber keinesfalls zieht sie den Gedanken in Erwägung, sie könnte wohl möglich schwanger sein...

Wenn inzwischen nämlich der Großteil der Geschäfte geschlossen ist, die Menschen sich alsbald in Gegenden mit hohem Infektionsgeschehen privat nicht mehr weit von ihrem Wohnort entfernen dürfen und sie auch keine Möglichkeiten mehr haben, sich außerhalb von eigenen Wohneinheiten zu vergnügen - irgendwoher müssen die hohen Zahlen schließlich kommen.
Und was läge da fern als die Dinge anzutasten, die man seit einem Jahr nicht im Ansatz auch nur in seine Diskussionen mal involviert hat?
Vor einem Dreivierteljahr wollte man auch noch jeden brandmarken, der Kinder als „Keimschleudern“ bezeichnet hat, obwohl alle Eltern das Leid kennen werden, was alsbald im Haushalt passiert, wenn das Kind mit Husten, Schnupfen, Heiserkeit nach Hause kommt - und man wollte ebenso fest behaupten, dass es an Schulen keinerlei Infektionsgeschehen gibt.
Inzwischen ist man in dem Punkt auch eines Besseren belehrt worden.

Gerade in der Großindustrie und der großen Wirtschaft wird bei den Hygienevorschriften mehr Schein als Sein betrieben, weil man mit dem minimalsten Aufwand das Wenigste im ganzen Ablauf verändern will. Die zu erbringenden Normen bleiben nach wie vor dieselben, wo es sie gibt; es läuft nach der Devise "scheißegal wie du mir das hinkriegst, Hauptsache es läuft alles wie immer!". Was dann in etwa zu solchen Szenarien wie im Frühling bei Tönnies führt, wo reihenweise Beschäftigte durch die Arbeitsstelle infiziert wurden.

Und, offen gesprochen, dem Virus ist es herzlich egal, warum ein infizierter Wirt wie weit sein Zuhause verlässt. Ob es für einen Arztbesuch ist und er weiß nicht von seinem Glück, oder ob er in der großen Wirtschaft schuften geht und das nach wie vor eine genehmigte Ausnahme von so gut wie allen Restriktionen darstellt.
Dem Virus ist es egal, durch welchen Ort es weiterverbreitet wird. Hauptsache nur, es kommen möglichst viele potentielle Wirte auf engem Raum zusammen, in die es sich einnisten kann.
Und in dieser Hinsicht stellt die Großindustrie und die Großwirtschaft keine Ausnahme dar.
matrixmann: (Default)
A reminder in times where mass media declare recently deceased former chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany Helmut Kohl "a person loving and always having fought for freedom":

In 1985, by the first government under chancellor Kohl, the change of the general law concerning the freedom of assembly had been applied that imposes a ban on wearing face coverings ("Vermummungsverbot") for most public events and a ban of protective gear such as armor of all kinds on these events.
Ever since then, the only right to assemble you have is to come around in your casual suit and to be recognizable for every policeman on this event at any given time.

(See post: https://matrixmann.dreamwidth.org/35829.html (all links in German))
matrixmann: (Default)
...der frühere Amtssitz des Bundespräsidenten, die Villa Hammerschmidt in Bonn, Relikt aus den Zeiten, als es noch zwei deutsche Staaten gab, ist bis heute verbindlicher Zweitsitz des Bundespräsidenten?

...that the former official office of the Federal President of Germany, mansion Hammerschmidt in Bonn, remnant of those times where two German states existed, still is in use until today as mandatory second residence for said Federal President of Germany?
matrixmann: (Default)
What use has tolerance in society for me, if before law I got no right to claim my order for me?
matrixmann: (Default)
"A reason why a state must remain neutral and clean of religion and mercantilism?
To serve all people equally and to maintain a public education system that teaches children by science that antibiotics won't make their head fall off, a car is no living monster to sit in, carnivores can't subsist on grass, potatoes not gonna eat you and that water doesn't poison plants in general."
matrixmann: Determined (Yuber Suikoden I)
"The land of the free never really cared about freedom. Not its politicians, not its oligarchs, not the people that really decide over the course of the country. It worked together with Nazis barely that they've fled from Europe just to bring down the Soviet Union because they were its political enemies. The United States - a Jew-friendly place? Open your eyes, by the time the Germans killed them by the masses in their concentration camps, nobody liked them anywhere either. Henry Ford was an anti-Semite, Disney was an anti-Semite - nobody thought about correcting their views or putting them to jail for it. Ford even had good trade relations with the Third Reich as long as it was possible. IBM delivered punch card machines for the bureaucratic administration of the concentration camps. If the United States really would have been so much against it, they had ordered those key technologies to be stopped to be delivered to the Nazis before they made the declaration of war. It would have just been a blow to them. Key technologies are always subject to the final OK of the state. If it doesn't happen, the administration doesn't want it. And the trail keeps continuing until the present. Fascists and butchers? As long as they're political enemies of an enemy of the states, they don't see reason why not making them their tool for a power change or to simply destroy the most promising competitor beside them.
One can't even tell how long in time this behavior goes back. It's been so much inherent to its system, it's like it goes back to the very early days - since the US was able to move on the international political parquet."

Mistake

21 April 2017 08:39 am
matrixmann: Determined (Yuber Suikoden I)
A thing that West German leftists don't get about real socialist way of economy is: They didn't invent it anew how structures to produce look like, or did an economy like a hippie community. They only took the old structures known from capitalism and erased the circumstance of having a feudal lord as an owner.
No private person alone or a group was the owner of a facility, the manager administered the factory according to a non-material idea that was "acting for the good of all other employees that work here". If he didn't do that and abused his position, he could be replaced by will of the other workers employed at this entity.
Everyone had his firm position, knew what set of tasks he had to do every day.
If you wanted to take a different position than your current one, you just moved up the ladder through the coventional way. Education or changing the branch, for example.
It wasn't like "today I do one thing" and "tomorrow the other", something unsteady - something that no-one can calculate with, much less raising a family.
Or something that requires all part-takers to be a firm believer of a certain thing to let this thing last.

Activist

4 March 2017 09:11 am
matrixmann: (Waiting for command)
"...Human rights need to be preserved...!"
"Human rights - do you really know what this term means? Do you actually have an imagination in mind what it means when these are taken away from you? Do you fucking know what it means to daily awake in a cell, the guards clinging with their tonfas through the bars all over the jail and the first thing they do is beating you up before breakfast? Do you fucking know what it means to get raped three times a day by various people and they spit down on you, piss on you and laugh about you? Can you feel what it means to get played on and it's fun to your torturer to break your bones and see you scream? Do you have any idea how it feels inside to be exposed to the public, to get thrown dirt at and you know either when you don't do as the hosts say or not, the audience is gonna rip you to pieces? Can you feel how terrified you are in all these situations? Or when your Mom, 3 times taller than you, beats you up as a child and locks you in the dark basement as punishment for screaming from pain?
When you stand before a bunch of youngsters that wait to take the popcorn out of their pockets while you cut yourself, shout at them for teasing you everyday anew?"
"... ..."
"Before repeating this term over and over again, get the hell of aware what it actually means! It's not about democracy, freedom all these empurpled phrases! It's not about headscarfs and crosses, gender equality, and you being prefered for a job because you're a woman! It's not about something you can catalog and protect with paper and pencil or claim before a court!
It's about not waking up everyday and the first thing you experience is getting smacked in the face and treated like somebody's tool for pleasure! - when you walk on the street, you get shot for fucking nothing! when you try to be a man, but still get raped and molested because for some still you are a woman for all eternity!
Before you pamper around the next time about your wrong life decisions being "discrimination" or civilian death exists in war, think twice what you get excited about!
You go to university and even your parents pay your ass, some even need to kill to be able to go to school! Some even kill because of school, because it drives them mad!
You think you've seen something?! Fuck it, the only thing you've seen is your golden cage from the inside! And that's the way you act and think!"



Can be seen as a correction or addition to this one: https://matrixmann.dreamwidth.org/84431.html
matrixmann: (Default)
Why do people make the traditional Muslim dresses a dithering question of "religious freedom" and "culture clash"?
A resolute solution to these questions is rather simple: Treat it with equality.
If it's a trouble in official positions if somebody wears such dresses and pieces of clothes, say: "I don't care if you wear a baseball cap, a cowboy hat, a fishing hat or whatever the fuck - here in this position all people ought to wear no headdresses."
Besides, if authorities are constrained to represent neutrality towards every kind of people, beliefs and political worldviews, then it's not only Muslims that should not wear religious signs, it's also Christians which can't wear a cross while on duty. Or can I wear my goth clothes while serving people in the registry office?
In school, there also used to be a time where I wasn't allowed to wear headdresses, the teacher would take them from me for the class or send me outside and put them into the wardrobe. Sunglasses on - well, if I had a certificate of a doctor saying so that I'd need them. Maybe somebody who's blind they'd never speak up against.
Jackets - only in winter if you said you feel cold. With an ordinary old school teacher - no wearing of your trenchcoat mafia memory dress in class!
So, why the hell screaming out that loud and discussion rounds and rounds about "Are we allowed to touch this? We mess with religion, people!"?
You also hurt the religious feelings of a Jedi if you tell him he can't wear his dress!
But you fucking put him under the term "screwball" and tell him he should integrate to the reality!
Are these feelings less worth than those of a member of a recognized religion?
In political views, it's even worse: Every Marxist gets regarded as "someone who looks at things the wrong way" and as enemy of the state. But let some openly expressing Nazi come, nobody's gonna say a word!
Respect only for those who we want?! What the fucking kind of "human rights activists" are you at all?! You're busy with erecting those dogmas again that your ancestors have been busy with tearing down during the last 100 years!
Some people get witch hunt - some get special protection. Just fucking be honest and tell the world it's not about protecting anyone's feelings about religion or looking at the state of the world, it's about fear, being a coward, and putting back up an age where everything you do is ruled by religions and not by human common sense!
Just fucking tell the world it's about establishing again "those people are different from us, that's why they live seperated from us and they're no part of our class war - they're free to be ignored or killed"!
matrixmann: (Default)
A note for a suggestion how to solve the misery when at least one parent isn't the biological ancestor (be it because it is an adoption inside a homosexual couple or an adoption by a couple which is unable to have kids together with each other):

Have one field in the birth application for the biological mother, have one field for the biological father - for the alimony issues, if both are available or can be detected, and for the sake of the child if he wants to meet the one of both he doesn't know (as often guaranteed by rights the state grants to a person to get to know his descent).
Then have another field in the application and in the birth certificate which states "otherwisely responsible care person in the juristic understanding of the rights and duties of a parent". And there you can enter whoever you want that gives his permission. A partner who's not a biological ancestor of that person, a person, like a close friend of the family, which is going to be responsible for the human mentioned on the paper like a parent in case one or both parents can't fully overtake this task or a concrete relative which is not in the direct bloodline grandparents-parents-child.
Additionally, this field should be extendable to more than one person - for the sake of couples being friend and people of trust to the biological parents.
And: It should be changeable anytime when both parties agree or when a court decision orders it.
matrixmann: (Default)
Ein netter Aspekt über die "Wiedervereinigung", den man wissen sollte: Abschlüsse, die nicht anerkannt werden, Geburtsurkunden, die nicht anerkannt werden - nur, weil dort ein Stempel mit Hammer, Zirkel und Ährenkranz drauf ist. Als hätten es sich die Leute aussuchen können, in welchem von beiden Staaten sie geboren werden.
Da weiß man schon gleich, dass man nur annektiert wurde.


A nice aspect about the German reunification that everyone should know: Graduations and degrees that don't get acknowledged, birth certificates that don't get acknowledged - only because there's a stamp depicturing hammer, dividers and garland of corn* on it. (*Note: It seems like there's no proper translation for "Hammer, Zirkel und Ährenkranz", so I took it word by word. As such it means the symbol in the flag of the GDR that distinguished the black, yellow and red German flag of that German state from the flag of West Germany, which can be found in the same colors, but blank in that middle space or with the black federal eagle instead.)
As if the people could have chosen which one of both states they were born in.
Such aspects let you know right away that haven't been reunified, but you have been annexed.
matrixmann: (Default)
Bureaucracy is... the way of the physical and intellectual powerless to still be able to have some influence onto their surroundings.
Because bureaucracy has nothing to do with logical processes in the functionality of the brain; it's like using a lock if you want to switch on your sound system.

Profile

matrixmann: (Default)matrixmann

Tags

May 2025

M T W T F S S
    1234
567 891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Statistics


Free counters!

Free counters!
Page generated 13 June 2025 07:33 am