Wartime

In reaction to a text from onb2017, I get upon the following:

As a Westerner speaking from within the West, I don't really see a unification to stand up against those forces which want to keep the workforce and majority of the population of the world down ever coming so soon.

The reason is the following: Everyone - differing groups - can't even agree on the color of turd.
How do you want to achieve a higher and more complex goal like that, if you can't even manage that triviality?

On the other hand, there is to be considered and has to be admitted: Do I want to work together with feminists, with intersectionalists, with Identity Politics disciples, which want to tell me that the suffering of a woman or a black person is always bigger than mine, if I happen to be a paleface and are not female?
Do I want to work together with people whose primary business every day is first offending me, ridiculing me and telling me that I'm the source of the evil of the world because I have the wrong sex (or want to convert into the wrong sex)?

These people should check out health problems with biological origins... Then they would learn that the problems they refer to - social problems - are solvable, if everyone really wants to, while biological health problems rarely are that solvable that they'll be gone completely. Plus, you can't run away from them, as you carry them with you wherever your go, even to the edge of the world with no other humans around anymore.

What I want to say by this: You stupid fools, obsessing with your social/human problems... Get a life. This will keep both of your hands busy with enough to do.
Even if human-made problems can be quite nasty, evil, violent, brutal and malevolent - still they are solvable (because it "simply" requires human agreement on a common basis and fairness), while problems resulting from bad material, material that cannot be exchanged after developing anymore, often aren't.
This type of problems can hit everyone, regarless of skin color, regarless of sex, regardless of ethnicity or wherever you were born on this planet.
Regardless of what you believe in, prefer or think is right and wrong.

And as long as there are larger groups of people which put their reverse racism and sexism as the top priority on their list instead of recognizing the usefullness in achieving something which everyone benefits from, the road to working together for a particular goal is going to be blocked.
Same for people who subscribed to esoteric nonsense, fucked up conspiracy theories and religious faith, who are hostile to fact-based edcuation and well-established medicine (and/or only accept the "education" and "medicine" which they approve of), who react aggressively if they get put in their place once in their lives - who only put an interest in getting themselves and their kin the best life and the best resources, making their children and grand-children and parents survive and leave everyone else to die.

You can't act together if there is no common ground and if each group is only interested in lobbyism for the social group they want to represent because they think their group is the best of all living creatures and everyone else is unworthy trash.
You can't act together if hate and despise for each other is the greatest point you have in common.
And if those who still want to be fair are being laughed at, silenced and then trampled upon - like, what they want and demand from everyone is totally impossible to achieve, or even "ignorant of all the wrongs being done to group X in history".

At least I find, I can't work together with people brain-washed and self-obesessed like that.
(They only want to change to the other side of the table anyway... That's what the character of their acting and their mindset strongly implies.)

Parts of them you even don't want to be seen with because their stupidity and greed is embarrassing as hell.

...Therefore, even if not wanting to subscribe to all that crap that divides everyone, there is no real way around having to surrender to parts of it because the differing social groups in society are so mutually incompatible with each other (also with your own viewpoints) - it's like wanting to make a lion work together with a type of animal that is its natural prey.

Danke, liebe Kleingangster und Assis in den Großstädten, dass jetzt wieder ein genrerelles Feuerwerksverbot auf den Tisch kommt, nur weil ihr zu dumm und zu dreist seid, verantwortungsvoll und wie Erwachsene damit umzugehen!!
Am Ende wird es nämlich wieder so kommen wie immer - der gemeine Bürger gibt eine weitere Freiheit ab, im Glauben, das Versprechen von Sicherheit möge davon Realität werden, schließlich wird es aber doch nicht kommen, weil es solche Leute gibt wie euch, die wissen, wo sie sich ihr Spielzeug auch weiterhin besorgt kriegen, und die Politik ist wieder mal zu dumm, das in ihren Schädel hineinzukriegen - wenn nicht sogar, dass man es ihnen unterstellen möge, dass sie das auch gar nicht beabsichten, sondern dass es nur darum geht, der Bürger, der sich korrekt verhält und und an die Gesetze, darf mal wieder ein Stück weniger.
Weil Politik inzwischen damit ein Problem hat, dass der Bürger überhaupt noch was anderes darf, außer Beifall zu klatschen, der vorgeschriebenen Einheitsmeinung zu folgen und jeden Tag fleißig Geld anschaffen zu gehen wie die Nutten auf dem Strich.
(Anbei, wer sich hat von der Medienhysterie um die "Kugelbomben" vereinnahmen lassen: Das Zeug ist keine illegale Hexenmagie, sondern Profifeuerwerk, was sonst üblicherweise in die Höhe geschossen wird. In mehreren hundert Metern Luft und von nichts weiter umgeben als solcher richten sie keinen Schaden an - wer schon mal bei Feuerwerk bei Veranstaltungen laute Kanonenschläge gehört hat, recht wahrscheinlich wird das genau so eine gewesen sein, weil das eine typische Geräuschkulise von ihnen ist. - Solches Profifeurwerk gehört natürlich nicht in die Fußgängerzone oder in die Hände von irgendwelchen Vagabunden und Kleingangstern, die es "lustig" finden, ihr Viertel damit zu terrorisieren und in ein Schlachtfeld zu verwandeln, dass dem Einschlag von Kriegsmunition danach in nichts nachsteht. - Wenn solche Feuerwerkskörper es in die Hände von Amateuren und Kriminellen schaffen, sollte man weniger die Frage nach einem Verbot von allem privaten Feuerwerk stellen, sondern wo bekommen diese Figuren diese her - und ist man mittlerweile schon längst nicht mehr Herr seiner Unterwelt in den größeren Städten. Können die, die sich daneben benehmen und an keine Regeln außer ihren eigenen halten wollen, mittlerweile dort machen, was sie wollen, es interessiert keinen und es hält sie auch keiner auf? Oder beim Aufhalten - stehen diejenigen, die das auch von Gesetzes wegen machen wollten, ziemlich allein und schutzlos dabei da, sodass sie es aus eigener Bedrohungslage nicht machen?)

Escalation continues.
The downward spiral keeps on heading further down.
Consumer prices explode - and polititians behave like fools in trying to combat them.
While actually not really trying to fight them.

Winning a war, protecting the world climate, preventing an economic recession from happening, and keeping up the growth - all of this, they want to achieve at once.
While ignoring the technical (im-)possibilities to do so and, even the more, how much these targets altogether contradict themselves and cannot be unified.

Some more big names die and leave the world - like rats leaving a sinking ship?
Or just their time having run out - and it just happens at the right moment to still depart in happiness and not see how the world goes down...

Wishful thinking continues to conquer the human brains all over the world,
narrowing the corridor of their sight - fueling aggression and dogmatic thinking.
Valuing some rules or standards higher than the practice that comes attached to them - and which may require an adjustment of the rules because of their unworldly overidealistic absoluteness that no-one can truly live.

It's almost like the human behavior itself wants to say "we're too many here on this planet to be able to live as lavishly as we want to"...

Da es aktuell mal wieder aufkommt, weil es einige medienwirksame Fälle gibt...
Offen und ehrlich: Spart euch die Tränen, euer öffentliches Herumgeheule und das betonte Entsetzen!
Eigentlich müsste man euch den Vorwurf des Laientheaters machen.
Warum?
Diese Art von Gewalt, dass Pubertierende gegen Gleichaltrige gewalttätig werden und es fröhlich filmen um sich später daran zu ergötzen und es über das Internet oder den Schulhof zu teilen, die gab es schon vor 10 Jahren und noch länger her. Die technischen Möglichkeiten, mit dem Handy zu filmen und zu fotografieren, gibt es nämlich schon so lang - sogar noch bevor Smartphones auf den Markt kamen. Seit ca. 15+ Jahren.
Und letztlich - davor wurden die Taten einfach nur nicht mit Bild und Ton dokumentiert. Geschehen sind sie aber trotzdem.
Was denkt ihr, warum Schüler einst an ihrer Schule Amok liefen? Jugendliche anderen Jugendlichen nach dem Leben getrachtet haben?
Etwa, weil "alles in Ordnung" war?

Jetzt darüber herumzuheulen, was Kinder mit anderen Kindern anstellen, dass sie sich sogar gegenseitig töten oder zu Tode kriegen aus nichtigen Gründen, und entsetzt zu tun, von wem sie das haben, so zu tun als ob es neu wäre - es verrät recht viel über das kollektive Gedächtnis und zeugt von einer allgemeinen Vergesslichkeit über die Vergangenheit.
Von der Planlosigkeit bei der Problemlösung will man gar nicht erst sprechen. (Wäre dies nämlich effektiv geschehen, gäbe es die heutigen Fälle nicht.)
Denn genau die gleiche Ratlosigkeit, die gleiche Hilflosigkeit und ewig die gleichen Lösungsvorschläge von höheren Strafen und Herabsetzung des Alters der Strafmündigkeit, die kennt man schon zur Genüge aus der Vergangenheit.

Wie wäre es denn mal damit, wenn man auch wirklich mal etwas tut, anstatt in irgendwelchen theoretischen Konzepten herumzuschweben, oder sich vor lauter Emotionen und geheuchelter Betroffenheit nur um sich selbst dreht?

Diese Kinder gibt es nur, weil sich niemand für sie zuständig fühlt. Weil ihnen niemand etwas von Substanz beigebracht hat, und sie ständig vor Medien geparkt wurden. Davor wurden sie von Betreuungseinrichtung und -person zu Betreuungseinrichtung und -person hin und her gereicht, wie Wertsachen, in deren Gegenwart ein Wachhund platziert wird, damit sie nicht abhanden kommen.
Kinder sind aber keine toten Gegenstände - ihnen muss man beibringen wie man ein verantwortungsvoller Mensch wird! Und wie man seine Emotionen reguliert! Wie man Konflikte löst, wie man mit Frustration umgeht, oder mit einem schlichten "Nein" des Gegenübers umgeht!
Das geschieht nicht, indem, dass man sie ständig überall nur herumreicht bis sie erwachsen sind, und immer steht nur im Fokus steht, dass sie möglichst die Eltern nicht nerven und einen guten Schulabschluss erreichen, um mal einen gutbezahlten Job ergreifen zu können.
Innere Ausgeglichenheit, Empathie und eine eigene Version von Moral - die entwickeln sie nur, indem, dass sie es sich von anderen Menschen abschauen!

Sonst bleiben sie eben nur ein paar verzogene Gören, in deren Gedankenwelt sich alles nur um sie selbst dreht, und denen jedes Mittel recht ist, um ihre Bedürfnisse zu befriedigen. - Auch Gewalt und der Tod.

Angesichts von um die Ecke stehenden "wilden" Sperrmülls, den dort schon seit mehreren Wochen niemand abgeholt oder beseitig hat, erinnert man sich ironischerweise daran, dass es da doch mal eine Gruppierung gab, die sich um die "Islamisierung des Abendlandes" besonders sorgte - und stellt fest, es sollten sich doch lieber die Leute über die Ghettoisierung (die Vermüllung, die konzentrierte Verlendung, den Verlust von Kinderstube und den Verlust von Allgemeinwissen) ihres Abendlandes Sorgen machen.

Just a critical question: US gun control activists - where are you if it's about the countless US foreign military aid and the guns it sells to the rest of the world? On top, to partly dubious and shady places, organizations and groups?
You also just stand ready for action if it's about your precious kids who could get shot at school or at their college by some weirdo or a kid from their own ranks that was bullied for all its life! If this shit can affect yourself, you feel the urgent need to do something against it - for example, to call for laws that are unrealistic that don't solve any problem.
But if the dying happens thousands of kilometers away from you, if it's not your kids who die, not your spouses, friends and relatives, you're nowhere to be seen, like you don't give a damn.
You know what? In your case, it stinks of typical narrow-mindedness, the usual US-centrism and it reeks of paid activism.
You just only care about something if it happens next door or the people who could be affected by it could be someone you personally know. If it could be somebody you hold dear.
You don't care a single bit about the general concept and anything else outside of your narrow ken that you have picked for yourself to act outraged!

Fuck you, people, FUCK YOU!
And fuck your stupid claims to care about people who die through firearms!
You're just a bunch of clowns in town!

Das neuste begehrte Objekt unter Hamsterkäufern (und allen, die wegen dem irrationalem Hamstern selbst anfangen, von einer Ware etwas mehr zu kaufen als sonst): Senf!
Hier speziell (eventuell regional bedingt): Bautz'ner Senf.

Thinking deeper about it, there is a little aspect to point out which surely won’t be irrelevant to the protests against the Covid vaccinations and the conspiracy theories surrounding them all around the world - and in which, bizarrely, these have something in common with the “Fridays For Future” movement:

It’s that if a civilization reached such technological, scientific and cultural heights and masses of general means and gadgets that it starts to forget the very base it stands on.
It takes the safe bubble it created to live in as self-evident and as the original state of nature.
While actually it’s the most unnatural state of things. And you have to do something for it in order to exist.

For example: The effect of vaccines first becomes noticeable if they weren’t given anymore.
If masses of people didn’t receive them.
As vaccines against the famous diseases you can vaccinate against didn’t exist, people died way earlier than today, they died of way more trivial causes, a lot died before they got 18 years old (high rate of child mortality), and people who survived infections with either a virus or bacteria way more often carried lasting damages away from this (often: early childhood) encounter into their adult lives.
This is still the case in places on the earth where these vaccines aren’t available or too expensive for an average person to get.
So when they were invented and people realized infants as well as themselves stopped getting sick and die from those diseases after they were vaccinated, people became clear of a reason to do this for. - No more getting sick, suffering and dying from crap that can be avoided.

A huge example that people of all ages have a personal benefit from is the tetanus vaccination.
Before that, just a single scratch could lead to this type of infection, which in the end paralyzes the nerve tissue that controls muscles in the body and leads to death.
And it’s barely avoidable as the bacterium that causes it lives in nearly everything. It’s everywhere around you.

So so-called “skepticism” and active refusal and even claims like “vaccination is murder” are actually a call to fall back to these circumstances among the population.
How can anyone be so stupid to want that?
Well, the best answer to this is: Because people aren’t aware of why they can lead such a cozy life. Lack of basic education and a lot of manipulative info from sources that function no better than hocus pocus magical crap made to make money that was sold to people in the Middle Ages are to blame for this.

In common with “Fridays For Future” this state of the mind has: Also the members and agitprop activists of this movement aren’t aware of what the order they raise their claims on comes together from.
For example, they take for granted that smartphones exist, that the internet and their platforms to communicate on globally exist, that they live a life on earth where they don’t need to mind neither money nor material if they get sick of something and can simply throw it away as they please.
But all that first needed to be invented, then needs to be fabricated constantly and then needs to be maintained constantly.
Electricity isn’t produced by the wall because the wall is kind of bored and doesn’t know what to do with its time. It’s produced in a power plant, that power plant needs any type of “fuel” or gizmo that moves another gizmo, whose movement generates the electric energy in the end that they take from the wall socket at home. And that needs to be done constantly, not just whenever you want. - Or you’ll have to accept that electric energy isn’t constantly ready to use.
Means of saving energy for later aren’t invented yet, and as it it looks it will be like with rechargeable batteries: It ain’t lossless and the energy saved will vanish over time when not using it. - Unless you’d save the energy compressed in something material that you can easily store and backlog (that would be fossil fuels like coal, gas and petrol, for example).
Not to forget: A power plant producing electric energy first needs to be built in order to serve the purpose to supply you with electricity in the wall socket.

The self-evidence of the presence of the internet is another issue of that umbrella.
The internet comes together by thousands of servers (and, in a simple sense, “computers”), interconnected with each other, running 24/7 all around the year. If you think that you can only switch these on when you need them, then most of the time nobody will be able to read your crap.
Because these computers keep masses of data ready to access for whoever wants to read them at any time of the day. - All the viewers that checked your stuff in the meantime you slept, worked or were at school, they could do that because someone else keeps your data ready and accessible all the time.
If your data didn’t lie on someone else’s server, you’d have to keep your own computer plugged to the net all around the clock, even when you’re absent and not at home, or nobody could read the crap that you post and pay attention to you.

Thousands of computers running at the same time, waiting for somebody to seek a connection with them with his personal computer or cell-phone - anyone who isn’t stupid gets an idea what kind of huge effort that is to keep up every day?
The internet isn’t “simply there”, it’s a complex infrastructure, like a net of tarred roads that you can comfortably drive on, and to be “there”, it needs to be made to come into existence.
Another thing that you have to keep ready to use and cannot just switch on and off whenever you want to use it yourself. The effort made in order to keep it up has to be constantly the same at all times or it won’t work as well as you know it.

Not even to get started on the third example: Their own lifestyle and the lifestyle of the family they live in...
Their parents go to work daily, in most cases don’t share a car because they’ve got to go to two completely different places, their parents don’t work near their home but in other towns and commute, they want to make it to buy a nice house, own a big car, save money so each of their kids can have a driver’s license and an own car as soon as the kids are legally permitted to drive, want 1 or 2 family vacations each year at least - and they don’t want their kids to miss any trend in order to not be socially excluded among their peers.
Last but not least, they also try to save up money from anywhere, on top, to send their kids to university (like university wasn’t something which you have to have the brains first and you can’t tell that from the first day of a child’s life).
All that until the kids get “aware” (their “Fridays For Future”-type of getting “aware”).
Anyone of them who pointed it out to themselves how much of an ecological footprint that already is until they reach “awareness”?
And that’s not even counting their own behavior in this calculation...

Reduced and collected in a short summary that is: No, kiddo, you’re not going to save the world now by going vegan, eating meat-replacement made from soybeans, peas and wheat!
Which, by the way, doesn’t reduce your footprint very much if they actually come from Brazil, like the beef steaks you ate before. (Anyone who praises the meat-replacement products asked where the substance they’re made of comes from?)

And, talking about “recycling”, how about that you wear the clothes of your elder siblings that are still alright - like poor people do?
Or that you use a technical gadget for 10 years or more? Repair it? Tinker around with it, so it can still be of service with new technical standards? Use it until it literally falls apart?
“Learn from the poor” is the correct motto in this issue, just as a reminder, not holding big public speeches and claim whatever the heck comes to your mind from adults how they shall behave.

By the way, skipping school to march on a rally - do these kids have any idea what kind of privilege they throw away thoughtlessly for just a little stomp on the ground of their inconsistent minds?
Kids in Africa and India and whatever places on earth not as rich as the first world dream of going to school instead of having to go to work and already earn some, so the family, including them, has something to eat and doesn’t need to freeze.
School is like the key to a better life, to more life quality and to a better job - and these kids take it so much for granted that they think they can spare it!!
Not even to speak of that they seem to think school without paying hundreds of bucks for it is a world standard!
If their rallies had a connection to something that went wrong in school, but no... it’s about “pointing the adults at doing something to stop climate change”.
Like - next time they go on a strike because the pocket money is too low...

This is social relations, making a plea, not doing something for a certain objective.
And then formulating one’s plea on a pretty high niveau of prosperity. Leaving one’s own role aside, acting like one doesn’t exist and does nothing wrong, but only all other people.

...You see how both have a similarity here?
Avoiding to mind one’s own base of a living, sect-like structures that want to make everyone convert, but they have very few to really say if you check them in the details.
If you fact-check them or check for doability, you find them two live in a dreamy world made of soap bubbles. Harboring an image of the world that doesn’t correspond with the reality.

When do you encounter such phenomena?
Mostly when a civilization is almost at its end. When people forget what their life as they know it is based on and take it for granted that they can eat grapes all day long (figuratively). And, on the other hand, can afford to dive deep down into their human interactions all day long. Be busy with the “he says, she says” and what is the correct way to worship and appreciate whatever the heck.
Act like their human quarrels are the most important thing in the world, like someone is watching and only waiting to interfere and deliver them from their anger towards each other.

(Someone discovers similarities in this description too?)

Nun ist es also amtlich - Olaf Scholz wird Angela Merkel in ihrer Position als Kanzlerin beerben.
Mutti ist dann weg in die Rente.

Angesichts dessen, welches Kabinett an fachlichen Nieten schon nach der letzten Wahl aufgeboten wurde und wie viel sich zwischendurch das Personalkarussell gedreht hat (insbesondere in der Regierungspartei CDU), weil irgendeinem die Kohlen unter den Füßen zu heiß wurden und er plötzlich die Verantwortung für die unpopulären Entscheidungen, die diese Zeit erfordert, nicht mehr auf seine Kappe nehmen wollte, werden die Erwartungen an das kommende Ministerkabinett recht hoch gesteckt - und bei der Auswahl der Personalien sogleich wieder auf dem Boden eines Sees versenkt.

Eine Oberniete, die aus Hamburg weggelobt wurde, nur damit sie endlich weg war, und die, ihrem Auftreten und ihrer persönlichen Agenda zufolge, auch in der CDU sein könnte, als Kopf der Bande - ein Superego als Außenministerin, die bereits jetzt dabei ist, großmäulig das Porzellan zu zerschmettern (in ähnlicher dümmlich-verklärter Manier wie man bei einem Donald Trump darüber noch lachte und gleichzeitig entsetzt war, um ihn im dritten Zuge am liebsten mitsamt seinem Stuhl aus dem Amt zu tragen) - ein selbsterklärter "Schweinebauer", bei dem noch abzuwarten bleibt wie er sich macht oder ob er sich inhaltlich ins Abseits schießt - und, zu guter Letzt, noch eine Figur als Finanzminister, vor der alle warnen, die etwas von Wirtschaft verstehen, weil er noch eingenommen ist von volkswirtschaftlichen Dogmen der 90er Jahre, die inzwischen, durch die Praxis erwiesen, als "überholt" gelten.

Allein bei diesem Anblick, ohne die anderen Minister noch zu kennen, könnte man dem schon nicht helfen als festzustellen: "Der Zirkus kommt in die Stadt - die Clowns sind schon da.".

Und die Tatsache, dass schon jetzt bereits Personen, die fachbezogen für bestimmte Ministerien eine wesentlich bessere Wahl gewesen wären, zugunsten von persönlicher Sympathie, Parteihierarchie und/oder "Aufbau zur populären Figur, die beim nächsten Mal bessere Wahlergebnisse erzielt", ausgeschlagen wurden, lässt allzu wenig darauf hoffen, dass dieses rot-gelb-grüne Ampel-Kabinett ernsthaft bessere Leistungen abliefern wird als es das letzte Kabinett unter einer Kanzlerin Merkel getan hat.

Kurzum: Freut euch schon drauf, wenn Luschen und Träumtänzer an die Macht kommen.
Bald darf man sich an Luftschnitzel mit Fantasiesoße erfreuen, weil die der Meinung sind, solche immateriellen Güter sind alles, was der Mensch zum Leben braucht. Hunger, Krankheit, Kälte und zu hohe Preise - das sind alles nur Einbildungen, die mit viel Willenskraft und Gebeten wieder verschwinden.
(Natürlich verschwinden sie, wenn man tot ist und keine Empfindungen mehr hat...)

I think I get it why you need these “alternative” or “wider” terms to describe your sex role in society, whose terms for sex (which you mistake with the social sex role aka “gender”) you perceive to be too narrow to include you.

You run after this bullshit from US-style social sciences because the world wasn’t ever a place before to teach you a differentiated way of thinking and understanding about sex - socially as well as physically and psychically. You run after these terms because solely them fetch you from the railway station you’re at inside - lost and mentally confused about yourself as you are.
If someone else did, you’d use their terms instead and regard yourself through this pair of glasses.
It’s not like they’re truly scientific, they just close a gap within what society and public school taught you about life.
By closing this gap, they only become scientific to you, although you sure have no idea of what science truly is like and how it works to generate and validate new knowledge and recognitions...

Uneducated simple small man’s mind. That’s what all this is born from.

And the world doesn’t do a good job of correcting that...
(Because much can be achieved by the plebs remaining intellectually and emotionally as simpleminded as a child, unlike if they individually all have a bit of brains and common sense and can figure things out by themselves, in case of need.)

---

Complementary with: https://matrixmann.dreamwidth.org/280907.html