Wartime

Ultrarechte, Erzkonservative, Nazis und der angebliche Kampf für Meinungsfreiheit - das hat sich eigentlich schon von der ersten Stunde an widersprochen...
(Denn diese Gruppierungen haben schon immer von Natur aus nur die Meinung geduldet, die mit ihrer übereinstimmt, oder ihr zumindest entgegen kommt und ihr zuarbeitet.)

In reaction to a text from onb2017, I get upon the following:

As a Westerner speaking from within the West, I don't really see a unification to stand up against those forces which want to keep the workforce and majority of the population of the world down ever coming so soon.

The reason is the following: Everyone - differing groups - can't even agree on the color of turd.
How do you want to achieve a higher and more complex goal like that, if you can't even manage that triviality?

On the other hand, there is to be considered and has to be admitted: Do I want to work together with feminists, with intersectionalists, with Identity Politics disciples, which want to tell me that the suffering of a woman or a black person is always bigger than mine, if I happen to be a paleface and are not female?
Do I want to work together with people whose primary business every day is first offending me, ridiculing me and telling me that I'm the source of the evil of the world because I have the wrong sex (or want to convert into the wrong sex)?

These people should check out health problems with biological origins... Then they would learn that the problems they refer to - social problems - are solvable, if everyone really wants to, while biological health problems rarely are that solvable that they'll be gone completely. Plus, you can't run away from them, as you carry them with you wherever your go, even to the edge of the world with no other humans around anymore.

What I want to say by this: You stupid fools, obsessing with your social/human problems... Get a life. This will keep both of your hands busy with enough to do.
Even if human-made problems can be quite nasty, evil, violent, brutal and malevolent - still they are solvable (because it "simply" requires human agreement on a common basis and fairness), while problems resulting from bad material, material that cannot be exchanged after developing anymore, often aren't.
This type of problems can hit everyone, regarless of skin color, regarless of sex, regardless of ethnicity or wherever you were born on this planet.
Regardless of what you believe in, prefer or think is right and wrong.

And as long as there are larger groups of people which put their reverse racism and sexism as the top priority on their list instead of recognizing the usefullness in achieving something which everyone benefits from, the road to working together for a particular goal is going to be blocked.
Same for people who subscribed to esoteric nonsense, fucked up conspiracy theories and religious faith, who are hostile to fact-based edcuation and well-established medicine (and/or only accept the "education" and "medicine" which they approve of), who react aggressively if they get put in their place once in their lives - who only put an interest in getting themselves and their kin the best life and the best resources, making their children and grand-children and parents survive and leave everyone else to die.

You can't act together if there is no common ground and if each group is only interested in lobbyism for the social group they want to represent because they think their group is the best of all living creatures and everyone else is unworthy trash.
You can't act together if hate and despise for each other is the greatest point you have in common.
And if those who still want to be fair are being laughed at, silenced and then trampled upon - like, what they want and demand from everyone is totally impossible to achieve, or even "ignorant of all the wrongs being done to group X in history".

At least I find, I can't work together with people brain-washed and self-obesessed like that.
(They only want to change to the other side of the table anyway... That's what the character of their acting and their mindset strongly implies.)

Parts of them you even don't want to be seen with because their stupidity and greed is embarrassing as hell.

...Therefore, even if not wanting to subscribe to all that crap that divides everyone, there is no real way around having to surrender to parts of it because the differing social groups in society are so mutually incompatible with each other (also with your own viewpoints) - it's like wanting to make a lion work together with a type of animal that is its natural prey.

† Pope Francis

(The currently acting Pope dies at 88 years old.)

Sometimes you wonder if the people who work for the (mass) media think of themselves like having a little of the touch of a deity. Totally overestimate their role in and for society and the services in practice they deliver.
Because - how could it be otherwise that alpha journalists who are economically relatively safe mindlessly repeat propaganda over and over again aggressively that screams of being such, or even join creating fake shit where it’s obvious later if you see it that it’s made up, that it’s been created, artificially arranged and cut together? If people from the outside can find out without the use of higher science that something is arranged circus, how come that the journalists who report the crap can’t recognize it similarly?
If that’s the case, there’s only one option... That they know they present fake and arranged shit. But they either don’t care or harbor the mentality “the ends justify the means”.
Meaning: They imagine being on a mission from the Lord himself or some sort of that.
Think like they have truth, justice and rightfulness on their side, and what they proclaim is totally unquestionable. Only a fool would dare to do that.

Because - it’s noticeable that acting as a tool of propaganda and war factories isn’t solely done by people who work for the media whose position is in economically precarious conditions, that they have to do that as part of their job because they don’t have the necessary personal freedom to refuse doing something.
Even more it’s being done by people who rather have made it up to the highest ranks, who are in an economically favorable position, who are firmly employed and don’t have to worry so soon about not getting engaged anymore by certain media houses, fired or dropped by the whole “craft” itself because of supposedly “having gone crazy” or “having joined the enemy side/the side of the unreasonable ones”.
So... if you can factually afford refusing, but don’t do it and even hang around at the front of the information war directly, rehashing the crap of the powerful ones or crap that’s supposed to influence the powerful ones (especially from politics), then there is nothing left but assuming a targeted will and belief in the shit that you spread and propagate.
Combined with probably overestimating yourself and your personal role for the ongoings of the world outside of human society, and subscribing to some sort of megalomania “I’m the news content because I make the news content!” (similarly to “I am the law!”) - the same arbitrariness that one can see with people who are self-righteous from the depths of their hearts and are little tyrants below the surface.

Wenn man sich die Bemerkung mal erlauben darf: Mittlerweile braucht niemand mehr Angst haben vor einer rechten Durchseuchung der Gesellschaft - seit den Baseballschlägerjahren in den 90ern ist die Jugend inzwischen wieder merklich nach rechts gerückt, diesmal aber zusammen mit den Erwachsenen und nicht als alleinige Gesellschaftsschicht.
Und es wird bestimmt nicht nur an TikTok liegen und dass die populäre rechte Partei dieses Zeitgeistes dort als allererstes und am effektivsten mit der Werbung für ihre Ansichten und ihr Verständnis von der Welt begonnnen hat.

Was gibt man der Gesellschaft schließlich, insbesondere denen, die in die Unterschicht und die unteren Einkommensschichten geboren werden? Bildung? Möglichkeiten zur Entfaltung? Mittel um den erblich bedingten Mangel an Geld wieder auszugleichen? Eine Hierarchie, wo sozial adäquates Verhalten belohnt und grob regelwidriges Verhalten nachhaltig sanktioniert wird? Aufmerksamkeit - außerhalb von "guckt mal da, die Assis! die füttern wir noch unnötigerweise mit durch! kommt, lasst uns auf die einschlagen, wenn wir mal wieder über unsere eigenen Fehler reden müssten, aber keine dazu Lust haben! und nehmen wir ihnen auch noch das wenige Geld weg, was wir ihnen zukommen lassen! - Sollen gefälligst arbeiten gehen, das faule Pack!"?

An all dem genannten wird seit einer Ewigkeit kontinuierlich immer weiter gespart - und da soll etwas gutes herauskommen, wenn man alles sich selbst überlässt?
Wenn man Teile der Gesellschaft zielgerichtet vernachlässigt - wie ein Kind, das man verhungern lässt?
Und außer der eigenen, inzwischen hohl gewordenen Propaganda nichts weiteres anbietet?

...Die Logik ist in etwa so als wenn man beten sollte, um das Hungergefühl verschwinden zu lassen.
Esoterik und Quacksalberei statt etwas, was wirklich helfen würde.
Nicht verwunderlich also, dass sich die Zustände ebenso kontinuierlich immer nur verschlimmern und nichts verschwindet!
Und letztlich irgendwann die Parteimitglieder und die kleinen Mithelfer nur noch verspottet werden oder gar Gewalt gegen sie angewendet wird.
Was hat die Allgemeinheit schlicht sonst von ihnen? Hilfe? Linderung der Not?
Nein, nur einen Haufen selbsternannter "Heiler", die vermeintlich mit "Hand auflegen" Probleme lösen wollen.
Am besten dafür noch Geld verlangen wollen - oder Lohn verlangen in Form von "Treue", "Wählerstimmen" und tausend (leeren) Bekenntnissen zur (leer gewordenen) Demokratie.

Angesichts von um die Ecke stehenden "wilden" Sperrmülls, den dort schon seit mehreren Wochen niemand abgeholt oder beseitig hat, erinnert man sich ironischerweise daran, dass es da doch mal eine Gruppierung gab, die sich um die "Islamisierung des Abendlandes" besonders sorgte - und stellt fest, es sollten sich doch lieber die Leute über die Ghettoisierung (die Vermüllung, die konzentrierte Verlendung, den Verlust von Kinderstube und den Verlust von Allgemeinwissen) ihres Abendlandes Sorgen machen.

Thinking deeper about it, there is a little aspect to point out which surely won’t be irrelevant to the protests against the Covid vaccinations and the conspiracy theories surrounding them all around the world - and in which, bizarrely, these have something in common with the “Fridays For Future” movement:

It’s that if a civilization reached such technological, scientific and cultural heights and masses of general means and gadgets that it starts to forget the very base it stands on.
It takes the safe bubble it created to live in as self-evident and as the original state of nature.
While actually it’s the most unnatural state of things. And you have to do something for it in order to exist.

For example: The effect of vaccines first becomes noticeable if they weren’t given anymore.
If masses of people didn’t receive them.
As vaccines against the famous diseases you can vaccinate against didn’t exist, people died way earlier than today, they died of way more trivial causes, a lot died before they got 18 years old (high rate of child mortality), and people who survived infections with either a virus or bacteria way more often carried lasting damages away from this (often: early childhood) encounter into their adult lives.
This is still the case in places on the earth where these vaccines aren’t available or too expensive for an average person to get.
So when they were invented and people realized infants as well as themselves stopped getting sick and die from those diseases after they were vaccinated, people became clear of a reason to do this for. - No more getting sick, suffering and dying from crap that can be avoided.

A huge example that people of all ages have a personal benefit from is the tetanus vaccination.
Before that, just a single scratch could lead to this type of infection, which in the end paralyzes the nerve tissue that controls muscles in the body and leads to death.
And it’s barely avoidable as the bacterium that causes it lives in nearly everything. It’s everywhere around you.

So so-called “skepticism” and active refusal and even claims like “vaccination is murder” are actually a call to fall back to these circumstances among the population.
How can anyone be so stupid to want that?
Well, the best answer to this is: Because people aren’t aware of why they can lead such a cozy life. Lack of basic education and a lot of manipulative info from sources that function no better than hocus pocus magical crap made to make money that was sold to people in the Middle Ages are to blame for this.

In common with “Fridays For Future” this state of the mind has: Also the members and agitprop activists of this movement aren’t aware of what the order they raise their claims on comes together from.
For example, they take for granted that smartphones exist, that the internet and their platforms to communicate on globally exist, that they live a life on earth where they don’t need to mind neither money nor material if they get sick of something and can simply throw it away as they please.
But all that first needed to be invented, then needs to be fabricated constantly and then needs to be maintained constantly.
Electricity isn’t produced by the wall because the wall is kind of bored and doesn’t know what to do with its time. It’s produced in a power plant, that power plant needs any type of “fuel” or gizmo that moves another gizmo, whose movement generates the electric energy in the end that they take from the wall socket at home. And that needs to be done constantly, not just whenever you want. - Or you’ll have to accept that electric energy isn’t constantly ready to use.
Means of saving energy for later aren’t invented yet, and as it it looks it will be like with rechargeable batteries: It ain’t lossless and the energy saved will vanish over time when not using it. - Unless you’d save the energy compressed in something material that you can easily store and backlog (that would be fossil fuels like coal, gas and petrol, for example).
Not to forget: A power plant producing electric energy first needs to be built in order to serve the purpose to supply you with electricity in the wall socket.

The self-evidence of the presence of the internet is another issue of that umbrella.
The internet comes together by thousands of servers (and, in a simple sense, “computers”), interconnected with each other, running 24/7 all around the year. If you think that you can only switch these on when you need them, then most of the time nobody will be able to read your crap.
Because these computers keep masses of data ready to access for whoever wants to read them at any time of the day. - All the viewers that checked your stuff in the meantime you slept, worked or were at school, they could do that because someone else keeps your data ready and accessible all the time.
If your data didn’t lie on someone else’s server, you’d have to keep your own computer plugged to the net all around the clock, even when you’re absent and not at home, or nobody could read the crap that you post and pay attention to you.

Thousands of computers running at the same time, waiting for somebody to seek a connection with them with his personal computer or cell-phone - anyone who isn’t stupid gets an idea what kind of huge effort that is to keep up every day?
The internet isn’t “simply there”, it’s a complex infrastructure, like a net of tarred roads that you can comfortably drive on, and to be “there”, it needs to be made to come into existence.
Another thing that you have to keep ready to use and cannot just switch on and off whenever you want to use it yourself. The effort made in order to keep it up has to be constantly the same at all times or it won’t work as well as you know it.

Not even to get started on the third example: Their own lifestyle and the lifestyle of the family they live in...
Their parents go to work daily, in most cases don’t share a car because they’ve got to go to two completely different places, their parents don’t work near their home but in other towns and commute, they want to make it to buy a nice house, own a big car, save money so each of their kids can have a driver’s license and an own car as soon as the kids are legally permitted to drive, want 1 or 2 family vacations each year at least - and they don’t want their kids to miss any trend in order to not be socially excluded among their peers.
Last but not least, they also try to save up money from anywhere, on top, to send their kids to university (like university wasn’t something which you have to have the brains first and you can’t tell that from the first day of a child’s life).
All that until the kids get “aware” (their “Fridays For Future”-type of getting “aware”).
Anyone of them who pointed it out to themselves how much of an ecological footprint that already is until they reach “awareness”?
And that’s not even counting their own behavior in this calculation...

Reduced and collected in a short summary that is: No, kiddo, you’re not going to save the world now by going vegan, eating meat-replacement made from soybeans, peas and wheat!
Which, by the way, doesn’t reduce your footprint very much if they actually come from Brazil, like the beef steaks you ate before. (Anyone who praises the meat-replacement products asked where the substance they’re made of comes from?)

And, talking about “recycling”, how about that you wear the clothes of your elder siblings that are still alright - like poor people do?
Or that you use a technical gadget for 10 years or more? Repair it? Tinker around with it, so it can still be of service with new technical standards? Use it until it literally falls apart?
“Learn from the poor” is the correct motto in this issue, just as a reminder, not holding big public speeches and claim whatever the heck comes to your mind from adults how they shall behave.

By the way, skipping school to march on a rally - do these kids have any idea what kind of privilege they throw away thoughtlessly for just a little stomp on the ground of their inconsistent minds?
Kids in Africa and India and whatever places on earth not as rich as the first world dream of going to school instead of having to go to work and already earn some, so the family, including them, has something to eat and doesn’t need to freeze.
School is like the key to a better life, to more life quality and to a better job - and these kids take it so much for granted that they think they can spare it!!
Not even to speak of that they seem to think school without paying hundreds of bucks for it is a world standard!
If their rallies had a connection to something that went wrong in school, but no... it’s about “pointing the adults at doing something to stop climate change”.
Like - next time they go on a strike because the pocket money is too low...

This is social relations, making a plea, not doing something for a certain objective.
And then formulating one’s plea on a pretty high niveau of prosperity. Leaving one’s own role aside, acting like one doesn’t exist and does nothing wrong, but only all other people.

...You see how both have a similarity here?
Avoiding to mind one’s own base of a living, sect-like structures that want to make everyone convert, but they have very few to really say if you check them in the details.
If you fact-check them or check for doability, you find them two live in a dreamy world made of soap bubbles. Harboring an image of the world that doesn’t correspond with the reality.

When do you encounter such phenomena?
Mostly when a civilization is almost at its end. When people forget what their life as they know it is based on and take it for granted that they can eat grapes all day long (figuratively). And, on the other hand, can afford to dive deep down into their human interactions all day long. Be busy with the “he says, she says” and what is the correct way to worship and appreciate whatever the heck.
Act like their human quarrels are the most important thing in the world, like someone is watching and only waiting to interfere and deliver them from their anger towards each other.

(Someone discovers similarities in this description too?)

As much as the Afghanistan war remained an apple of discord throughout the whole time of the 20 years the occupation of the Western troops lasted because of the shady reasons it was started with, it also simultaneously and silently became a train you couldn’t just jump off anymore and quit tomorrow.

Now with their departure, the tactical and political changes of the coming weeks and months will be a proof of that - and, at the same time, it will lay down the sad record of that the two biggest and strongest armies in modern history - the US army + its NATO associates and the Soviet Army - couldn’t rip out the root of exaggerated Islamic religion in this region and create a united country called “Afghanistan” that can claim its rank in the modern world order.
Be that that the religious extremism was just started and about to be strengthened (the Afghanistan war of the Soviet Union) or that it is a result of past foreign engagements gone wrong (the support of the US for the mujaheddin fighters in the 80s to make the Soviet Union fall; the support of the Syrian rebels, which were mostly if not entirely Islamic extremists as well, and by that helping creating the Islamic State, strengthening Islamic religious motivated terrorism and systematic violence on the whole and in the whole Middle East area) and that it outgrows one’s own powers and finances that one was originally willing to sacrifice for this endeavor (the Afghanistan war of the US and the NATO troops that were still deployed there).

It’s hard to guess how much the decay inside these big players make out a share in their respective defeat...
As a question to those two wars you can leave behind if how war itself is being led in these modern times hasn’t changed too much from the scheme of firm organized and equipped armies fighting each other on the battlefield, as it still was the case in WWII and its later offshoots around the world.

For this specific case, you can put on the record - as bitter, brutal and cynical it may sound: As long as the residents of this country who aren’t involved in religious extremism aren’t willing themselves to take a different path, to organize and do something to drive this out of their country, to rip this root of war and violence out in their society once and for all and harshly sanction it, as long as they rather flee abroad or to Europe, giving in to the order that a guerrilla army imposes on them - as long as that remains the case, this country won’t ever be peaceful and “free” again (whatever anyone wants to imagine under the term “free”).

That Afghanistan which even received a seat in the Intercosmos program and could see one of their citizens fly into space to the Mir station will be missing for a very, very long time now...

Actually, the charge of the Capitol is just the tip of the ice berg of a development that's been going on for longer in the United States.
It's an event displaying the deep split within the US society and its political system, as well it's an expression of two very sharply opposing forces which both firmly believe to have found the Holy Grail and be on a mission from the Lord itself, while they're just both streams trying to force their understanding of how the world works upon the rest of the society governed by them.

In other words, to the people lesser educated about the US: Intersectionality is just radical racism and sexism through the backdoor, it doesn't change anything, and violent anti-racist protests and arbitrary juristic accusations against whoever is in the wrong place at the wrong time aren't going to fix your country (neither they bake you a loaf of bread) - just like a drifting back to nostalgia, glorifying golden economic ages which are no more, displaying one's guns in public all the time, disregarding the rules what one's country is made of and governed by, believing in bullshit theories about getting younger and 150 years old through the blood of children, stepping on the lesser financially fortunate and steadily disputing over if the poor deserve to get any handouts like social benefits and a general health insurance (because they're supposedly "of no use to anyone") isn't going to make anything turn to the better.

Each side needs to take a step back from their replacement religion and recognize it for what it is: Something that only takes places in their heads. Imagination.
And then take a precise pragmatic look at what the problems are - facts, not faith.

(It isn't called "theory" for nothing... "Theory" means "explanation pattern lacking scientific proof for it".)

In the case of US society drifting apart and being shortly before fighting each other physically, all supporters of both fractions can take a good look at themselves, if they search someone to blame.
It's your fault altogether!

Just so you heard it for once...

Die kritische Sache mit dem Sympathisieren oder gar Teilnehmen an einer politischen Bewegung ist die: Irgendwann beginnt man als Direkt-Involvierter sowohl Größe als auch Wirkkraft und Wahrheitsgehalt des eigenen Lagers zu überschätzen.
Da gibt es plötzlich überall Menschen, die denunziert werden, weil sie sich mit der von einem selbst unterstützten Bewegung offen solidarisch erklärt haben oder auch nur irgendwas aus deren Strauß an Thesen geäußert haben. Da gibt es plötzlich Leute, die genau nur wegen ihrer Meinung eingesperrt oder in die Psychiatrie eingewiesen wurden - nicht etwa, weil sie schon zuvor vielleicht irgendetwas ungesundes in ihrem Kopf am Laufen hatten, was eventuell für sie oder auch andere hätte gefährlich werden können; oder weil sie schon zuvor in dubios anmutende Machenschaften verstrickt gewesen sind und nur keiner was dazu gesagt hat.

Letztlich gerät dort, früher oder später, das Engagement außer Kontrolle und wird genau zu der eingeschworenen verschwörerischen Gemeinde, die man eigentlich an anderen pausenlos kritisiert. Paranoid und von Misstrauen durchzogen, die Wanzen im Computer oder im Lichtschalter witternd, und ständig betonend wie sehr alle verarscht werden und nur man selbst das absolute Gegenmittel dafür hat. Als wären alle anderen dumm, die entweder nicht an der Bewegung teilnehmen oder nicht wenigstens ihre Thesen einleuchtend finden.

Was dieser Mikrokosmos in Bezug auf die eigene Wahrnehmung allerdings erzeugt: Außer der Bewegung und der Richtigkeit ihres Inhaltes gibt es weder rechts noch links noch irgendetwas richtiges oder rechtschaffenes. Auf die Wahrheit hat man selbst das Patent angemeldet. Egozentrik in Reinform. Alls dreht sich nur um einen selbst und man badet ständig in der eigenen Gedankensuppe.
Wer das ebenfalls nicht bestätigt, ist genauso dumm wie all die Ungläubigen. Braucht die Erleuchtung, braucht die Errettung, die nur von der eigenen Bewegung ausgehen kann...

Es kommt bei dieser Hineinsteigerung völlig die Wahrnehmung der Realität abhanden.
Wie wichtig ist man wirklich für den Verlauf der Dinge? Wie faktisch richtig ist man wirklich?
Nimmt man nicht auch Dinge inzwischen in einem ziemlich verdrehten Licht war, nur weil das die eigene Meinung bestätigen könnte? Übertreibt man nicht mitunter auch, bewertet Dinge oder Meldungen über - oder verknüpft Details zu einem Konstrukt, welches real nicht gegeben ist?
Vor allen Dingen: Stimmt die große Mär von der Diktatur, die man ständig aufpumpt wie einen Luftballon?

Bewegungen, die davon bestimmt sind, Leute vor irgendetwas zu retten, sind so abhängig von ihrem Schreckensszenario, dass sie nicht anders können als dieses aufrecht zu erhalten. Ständig an jeder Ecke Beweise für ihre genannten Einschränkungen der Freiheit zu sehen. Auch wenn immer noch die meisten Menschen frei herumlaufen dürfen und nicht wegen irgendwelcher vermeintlicher Gesinnungsverbrechen eingesperrt wurden.
Medienkonsum spielt hier auch eine sehr kritische Rolle... Dilettantische Schreiberlinge und dumme Politiker, die sich jeden Tag meinen mit schwachsinnigen Forderungen oder populistischen Phrasen wichtig machen zu müssen, können einen schnell glauben machen, dass der Weltuntergang bevorsteht und eine ähnliche Diktatur wie die des Hakenkreuzes unmittelbar auf dem Weg ist. Dass all das nur einen Katzensprung entfernt ist und spätestens in 5 Jahren alles zu sehen sein wird.

Realistisch aber sieht die Antwort vielmehr so aus: Selbst wenn jemand so etwas anvisiert, erstens wird es kaum genauso aussehen wie das Urkonzept (weil der gleiche Trick einfach nicht zwei Mal funktioniert und keine Garantie darauf bereithält, noch einmal das gleiche Resultat zu erzeugen), und zweitens, wird es viel, viel langsamer verlaufen als der menschliche Verstand herbeireden will.
Die Entwicklung gravierender politischer Veränderungen hat sich in diesem Jahrhundert dahingehend verschoben, dass sie entweder sehr plötzlich ihren Lauf nehmen - wenn man mitten drin ist, realisiert man kaum, was da gerade um einen herum passiert - oder über sehr lange Zeit vor sich gehen, schleichend und aus dem Hintergrund.

Erkennbar ist das schon, wenn man nur einen Blick auf die Ereignisse und Prozesse der letzten 10-20 Jahre blickt: Wie oft wurde dort beispielsweise der Überwachungsstaat herbeigeredet, nur weil der Staat sich Zugriff auf große Datenmengen verschafft, und gefürchtet, dass alsbald pauschal eine ganze Menge unbequemer Leute in den Arrest gesperrt werden, nur weil sie ein paar bestimmte Gegenstände auf Amazon gekauft haben, aus der man eine Waffe oder eine Bombe basteln könnte?
Immer noch ist der reale Zustand, dass der Staat seinen potentiellen Kriminellen dieser Art hinterherrennt - weil er schlichtweg kaum Kapazitäten hat, um selbst das ihm zugängliche Material auszuwerten. Auch ist er nach wie vor unabdinglich auf die Hilfe von Petzen und Blockwarte, euphemistisch so genannte „besorgte Bürger“, angewiesen, die ihm zielgerichtet Hinweise geben, wo etwas zu holen sein könnte.
Im Gegenzug haben die Bürger selbst wiederum dazugelernt und wissen sich zu verstecken, wenn sie nicht wollen, dass jemand mitlauscht. - Das alte Katz&Maus-Spiel wurde also annähernd auf den Ausgangszustand zurückversetzt.
Massenverhaftungen, so wie man es unter einem Innenminister Schäuble, oder Verbote diverser Medieninhalte und -formen wie unter einer Familienministerin namens Zensursula befürchtet, lassen bis heute auf sich warten.
So viel dazu wie schnell sich eine Diktatur zusammenformiert.

Das dürfte auch dieses Mal der Fall sein, wenn man über medizinisch unsinnige „Immunitätsausweise“ diskutiert oder über den Maskenball mit Maulkörben referiert.
Absoluter Blödsinn, der in den Raum geworfen wird, aber faktisch genau solcher ist, wird sich auf die Dauer wieder im Sande verlaufen, genau weil ganz andere im Hintergrund den Einwurf leisten werden, welcher absolute Blödsinn es ist - auch wenn es manchmal lang dauern sollte bis die Wahrheit siegt.

Betrachte man es mal an einem Beispiel: Killerspiele gibt es bis heute immer noch.
Entgegen jeglicher Aufschreie nach einem Verbot und jeglicher politischer Bestrebungen vor vielen, vielen Jahren.