matrixmann: (Standing one's ground)
Immer wieder wird in den letzten Monaten und Jahren der Kampfbegriff "Femizid" in den Raum geworfen - wisst ihr aber, wo er genau bei der gleichen Heuchelei mitmacht, und den bestehenden Verhältnissen ohne Ausnahme zuarbeitet?
Genauso das ewig gleiche einseitige Geplärre über vorgeblich in dieser Zeit "ausartender Gewalt gegen Frauen" in den westlichen (wohlhabenden) Ländern?

Bei Gewalt gegen Kinder.

Da stellen die Gläubigen des Feminismus um keinen Deut irgendwelche Forderungen nach härteren Strafen, besserer Strafverfolgung oder Fußfesseln.
Warum auch? Kinder sind schließlich keine Frauen - und nur um die schert sich der Feminismus.
Beziehungsweise, nur die Hälfte von ihnen sind welche (oder werden mal welche); der Rest gehört ja zu den bösen Schwanzinhabern, die pauschal ja sowieso nur einmal zu Vergewaltigern werden und soaziale Privilegien bis aufs Messer gegen Frauen verteidigen werden, und daher keines Schutzes bedürfen...

...Nicht nur, dass daran der versteckte, aber genauso üble Sexismus des Feminismus offensichtlich wird (und aller, die ihn in diesen Jahren blind mit Löffeln gefressen haben) - man merkt auch, wie sehr diese Ideologie um sich selbst kreist und sich alles, im Grunde, auch nur um Klientelpolitik dreht. - Wo vielleicht einzelne Protagonistinnen noch persönlichen Gewinn daraus ziehen wollen.

Böse könnte man dabei sogar davon sprechen: Siehe man wie kinderfeindlich die feministische Ideologie ist.
Denn sie sieht sich nicht genötigt, noch den Bedarf danach, mal etwas dafür zu tun, dass Leute, die Kinder schlagen oder vergewaltigen, oder für irgendwelche egoistischen/egozentischen Zwecke missbrauchen, oder großangelegte Pornosammlungen von Bildern mit ihnen oder Quälereien von ihnen anlegen, mal einigermaßen angemessener zu dem Schaden, den sie auf lange Sicht bei den Betroffenen anrichten, bestraft zu werden.
Keiner, der von dieser Seite mal darauf hinweist (bzw. auf den Zug aufspringt): Kinder sind keine halben Erwachsenen, und darum dürfen Strafen bei Vergehen gegen Kinder auch nicht viel geringer ausfallen.
Kinder, die nämlich heute körperlich und mental zerstört werden, sind die fehlende Zukunft von morgen. - Werden diejenigen sein, die langjährig das Gesundheitssystem beschäftigen werden, wegen der vielen Folgeerscheinungen von Missbrauch und Traumata.
Sie werden kaputte Erwachsene sein, die eventuell vom Arbeitsmarkt weg sind, viel wahrscheinlicher aber noch wieder Kinder hervorbringen werden, die sie genauso zu weiteren kaputten Erwachsenen prägen werden. - Schneller als sie sich ihrer Vergangenheit und deren Auswirkungen auf ihr Innenleben bewusst werden.

Übel gesprochen: Feminismus, du arbeitest den Pädos und ihren Netzwerken in allen Gesellschaftsschichten wunderbar zu pass!
Weil du dich nämlich nicht dafür interessierst, wie die Jüngsten, die einmal die Zukunft sein werden, kaputt gemacht werden.
Du willst nur harte Strafen für Leute, die irgendwas gegen Weiblichkeit machen oder haben; irgendwelche Rachsucht befriedigen.
Ob es aber noch toxischer (um mal deine Wortwahl und Rhetorik aufzugreifen) für die Gesellschaft ist, dass weiterhin Gewalt gegen Kinder geradezu wie ein Kavaliersdelikt bestraft wird - so weit willst und kannst du nicht denken.
Somit offenbarst du ziemlich deutlich, in einem weiteren Aspekt von vielen, dass du in Wirklichkeit an keiner Veränderung der Zustände interessiert bist, sondern nur auf die andere Seite des Tisches wechseln willst. Andere mal schlagen, drangsalieren und herumschubsen können willst.

Die Vorwürfe von Betroffenen, die einst mal solche Kinder gewesen sind, dass Gewalt gegen Kinder vergleichsweise lasch gesühnt wird, gegenüber Straftaten an Erwachsenen, in dieser Tradition machst du nämlich "fröhlich" weiter, lieber Feminismus - und macht ihr auch weiter, liebe Feministinnen!

Steckt euch also euer Gesülze von "jeden Tag wird eine Frau..." und euren Femizid in wesentlich behüteteren Teilen der Welt als Afrika oder Nahost (wo erheblich mehr Gewalt and Frauen passiert als ihr es in eurer abgeschirmten Käseglocke des westlichen Wohlstands kennt) sonstwohin.

(Täglich sterben mehr Menschen auf der Welt durch Krieg als nur eine Person - und ihr schert euch um eine einzige Frau im Westen, die zu Tode kommt, nur weil sie eine Frau ist...)
matrixmann: (Default icon)
Ein (US-)Amerikaner als Papst?
Ausgerechnet in dieser Zeit?
Und das soll nichts mit der größeren Politik zu haben?
matrixmann: Determined (Yuber Suikoden I)
Merz's Horrorkabinett ist nun enthüllt... Und - einerseits erstaublich viele Unbekannte (um nicht zu sagen "nobodies"), und andererseits er als "Oberältester" dazwischen. Alles keine besonders alten Gesichter. (Was die SPD als ihren Anteil an der Regierung schicken wird, steht noch aus; kann man also daher jetzt noch nicht einschätzen und bewerten.)
Die Personalie, einen "Chef" von MediamarktSaturn in einen Ministerposten einzusetzen (jemanden direkt aus der Wirtschaft), hat, offenkundig, etwas von Filz und von Manieren, die man sonst vielmehr dem aktuellen US-Präsidenten Donald Trump zuschreibt. (Wie das qualitativ endet, wird man sehen.)

Insgesamt, und da wird man wohl kaum etwas aussprechen, dem andere nicht zustimmen werden - diesem Minsterkabinett, in Kombination mit seinem Kanzler im schon gesetzteren Alter schon bei Amtsantritt, gibt man keine vollen 4 Jahre Amtszeit.
Die CDU dürfte das selbst auch so sehen (bzw. ahnen), und darum werden größtenteils Unbekannte aus den hinteren Bänken in die Ministerposten eingesetzt. - Sollte sich jemand von diesen "beweisen" in dieser Zeit, erhält man jemanden, den man weiter verwerten kann; sonst aber, wenn die Koalition nicht seine volle Amtszeit durchhält, hat man dann wenigstens niemanden "verschwendet" und seinen Namen vorzeitig unbrauchbar für die Zukunft gemacht.

Obendrein dann auch noch der Faktor von Außen: Nach der Ampel sind die Erwartungen entsprechend tief angesetzt, man rechnet mit keiner nennenswerten Verbesserung im Vergleich zu deren Arbeit.

Nach der, ob seiner rechtlichen Gültigkeit, höchst umstrittenen Abstimmung des noch alten Bundestags, um Merz's Schuldenpaket zu verabschieden, hängt über dieser nächsten Regierung sowieso, noch bevor sie angetreten und im Amt ist, ein Damoklesschwert, dass sie es, wenn die Bedingungen nicht in den Kram passen, mit dem Recht nicht so genau nehmen wird - und, dass, wenn man solche offensichtlich unsauberen Taktiken verwendet, es in Wahrheit ziemlich schlecht um die BRD stehen muss. (Gemeint sei hier: Finanziell, die Staatsfinanzen und damit auch die Kreditwürdigkeit betreffend.)
matrixmann: (Dark (1))
Syria has fallen.

After more than 13 years of war, just a few weeks of Blitzkrieg, in the end, came to be that decisive to settle the score...

The backgrounds of this sudden result are yet to be explored.
matrixmann: Irgendwas ist hier gründlich schiefgelaufen... (Something's happened here...)
Es steht fest, Trump kommt wieder, es hat sich nun auch ausgeampelt - hat nicht demnächst irgendwer anderes wichtiges auch noch was besseres vor als was er gerade macht? Zum Beispiel... Weiß nicht, der Papst oder so?
matrixmann: (Dark (1))
Escalation continues.
The downward spiral keeps on heading further down.
Consumer prices explode - and polititians behave like fools in trying to combat them.
While actually not really trying to fight them.

Winning a war, protecting the world climate, preventing an economic recession from happening, and keeping up the growth - all of this, they want to achieve at once.
While ignoring the technical (im-)possibilities to do so and, even the more, how much these targets altogether contradict themselves and cannot be unified.

Some more big names die and leave the world - like rats leaving a sinking ship?
Or just their time having run out - and it just happens at the right moment to still depart in happiness and not see how the world goes down...

Wishful thinking continues to conquer the human brains all over the world,
narrowing the corridor of their sight - fueling aggression and dogmatic thinking.
Valuing some rules or standards higher than the practice that comes attached to them - and which may require an adjustment of the rules because of their unworldly overidealistic absoluteness that no-one can truly live.

It's almost like the human behavior itself wants to say "we're too many here on this planet to be able to live as lavishly as we want to"...
matrixmann: (Black suits comin')
Henry Kissinger

(Died 100 years old.)

(insert "Straight to hell"-jingle of your own choice here)
matrixmann: (Thinking)
2022: Russia starts an endeavor that Western sources prophesied about for months and which some sympathizers of it say it was inevitable for 8 years already - the Russian Federation invades the former Eastern territories of Ukraine (since 2014: the self-proclaimed independent peoples’ republics of Donezk and Luhansk), officially calling it a “special military operation” in order to stop the ongoing bloodshed against ethnic Russians that takes place on these territories since shortly after a coup d'état in Kiev known as “Euromaidan”.


The situation is still ongoing with no end of the hostilities in sight - and due to the entanglement of several European countries and the United States of America in this issue (making it a matter of larger extent than just a regional conflict between neighboring countries), on both sides, everyone has to watch their mouth what to say and write and how about the conflict in public.
matrixmann: (Standing one's ground)
In the light of today as the topic of “negotiations” is continuously being wiped off the table with arguments like “Putin started this war” and “Why should Ukraine aspire surrender while they’ve been attacked?” - let’s recall why negotiations are held at all in war scenarios.

When do officials and representatives hold them with representatives of the opponent?
Huh?
First and foremost, it’s not a question of giving up immaterial “values” and virtues” that one side thinks to have on its side - it’s not a question of ideology and idealism.
Plainly, it’s a matter of pragmatism.

Negotiations over truces and “peace” are being held if one side recognizes that it’s about to lose and being crushed, so the smarter people among the state officials figure they’ll be better off stopping to try to win the war by force and rather try to save the slice of the cake that they still have under their control instead of eventually maybe ending up with none of it.

The essence of sitting down to hold negotiations is not surrendering and handing everything over to the enemy that it wants, but more than that securing some little bits of what one still has instead of losing everything and then depending on the arbitrariness or mercy of the winning opponent what few bread crumbs will be granted to oneself.

You practically do that by trying to find things to offer to the enemy fraction for which it shows itself willing to give up the demands for another item. And you do that up until the enemy fraction becomes content and leaves again.

It’s no different than negotiating a price in a handshake deal.
A buyer has interest in obtaining a particular item, the seller tells you the price, but the buyer doesn’t have enough money or doesn’t want to pay that much, so it needs to approach the seller and see if they are hardened in their stance or if there’s some room that can be debated over.

In that case, it’s “only” that the item that you want to buy is “peace” - or at least a truce so that the fighting and the destruction stops.

Negotiating is a tactic that is known in wars and armed conflicts for centuries. As old as such scenarios.

So this isn’t like an “absolutely crazy idea” in this conflict.
Rather it should be asked: What speaks objectively so much against it?

(Unless the explanation is that there are very stubborn humans involved in this specific case that are occupied by ideology and emotional biases who have a very distorted understanding about war at all - that all that there is to obtain is winning, like in a manic fanatic attitude heading for a crusade, heading towards total war, not just mere self-defense.)
matrixmann: Determined (Yuber Suikoden I)
...Is there something meaningful to say during these days where the events of today also progress on their way tomorrow? Unimpressed and not impacted by personal opinions of anyone outside of circles of power and public influence?

There's a lot of words that you could voice and drop about the state the world it is in and what and who is responsible for it - but, will it matter? Will it matter anything? Outside of maybe getting into personal trouble? And having to fight that out alone?

Not only that it's war again in Europe - and one of the most devastating times after WWII; unlike in the war over Yugoslavia where NATO came to drop bombs and anytime they won with their orgy of violence -, meanwhile whole NATO discusses and fantasizes about sending weapons into a combat zone headlessly and without safety guarantees which hands these are gonna end up in, while at the same time every time it denies that WWIII has broken out and that its member countries play a very lively part in that. And that Ukraine, their investment proxy in this endeavor, is winning all the time for 11 months, although if it truly did, the war would already been over for a long time.
What kind of world has this become? - Or was it ever any different? Has it only been smart enough in covering its true nature with enough glitter and gold in order to make most of the population believe in its harmlessness and goodwill, being not worth a critical thought about it?

The Western world which calls itself "democractic" and still keeps on spreading its curses on a former president of the United States Trump, using acting and verbal expressions like #NotMyPresident, just because he didn't function according to the usual wishes of the economic and political establishment, seriously shows up and wants to make believe like its whole population supports these political decisions while the reality actually is that there would already be enough people out there to support a national #NotMyPresident campaign in every damn coutry against these so-called "democratic" current leaders. If it wouldn't entail the possibility of becoming subject to repressions or being publicly thrown into the camp of the political right (or whatever kind of zeitgeisty "public enemy"-image) and maybe losing your job and seeing your private life going down the drain through these unfounded mere accusations.

In which point do these policymakers pose anything different than this clown? Making decisions all the time that at least half of the country opposes over its ridiculousness and the danger they create?

The Western world keps reassuring itself over and over again that they're the good guys, the righteous ones - those with all the virtues and values worth fighting for.
But, seen from the prespective of the rest of the world, and seen from the viewpoint of a sober mind, it much more eventually turns into the Death Star from Star Wars. Destroying everything it disapproves of and enslaving everything it can for the profit of the Empire. While leaving behind the trash, the blood and the scattered body parts in the landscape to those who live in the ruins of its acting.

Long story short: Go the hell and make your war alone! Go and have a seat in your own tanks and go to the frontline!
The earlier the warmongering lobbyists and politicians are gone, including their obedient fanboys and fangirls, the better for everyone else who just want to live in peace and quiet.
matrixmann: (Standing one's ground)
You know what’s going to be the biggest factor getting in the way of soothing the extent that climate change will have on this blue sphere here?
The international community outside of the Western countries gives a fuck about so-called “green technologies”. They care more about their own development, which had been kept down for centuries by the plundering of the dominant European and North American countries. And that means, cheap energy accessible to the biggest mass of people and local industries carries more importance than making it as exclusive as it can get through applying complex and expensive technologies in the chain, which the bigger parts of the population in the first world countries are able to afford (in whatever way possible to individuals).
The mindset of the Western world and what they think of as “problems” is so far away from those of the rest of the world - literally elevated thousands of kilometers above the ground, figuratively.

So are many other issues such as that of a cultural nature, for example.
The rest of the world literally doesn’t care about the gender-fantasies of twenty-somethings in the US or Europe and their dreams of deconstructing the biological base of the two sexes. Or about rainbow flags, pride months and loudly celebrating LGBT minority rights like they would be a cure against HIV and cancer altogether (rights which quite a chunk of areas in the world don’t have anyway).
There are way more urgent problems to them than such boredom- and living-in-security-driven ergotherapy of emphasizing things that revolve around the aspect of the anthropocentric worldview to overestimate the social ongoings between humans in a society.

To the rest of the world, the classic aspects of the mindset of the anthropocentric worldview are important: Where do humans get a space to live, a roof over their head, food and water for humans, jobs to earn money and chances to procreate - as well as chances to feed that offspring and raise it into an adult.

If you want to get the rest of the world into the same boat as the culturally loony Western part of the planet, then you first rather need to get them to abandon their part of the anthropocentric worldview, in which all natural resources of the planet exist just to serve and be consumed primarily by humans. - Including your own focus where human business and social interaction still also overshadows everything, beside you talking about “wanting to save the world” and “protecting the environment” (inconsequently).

Touché!

26 July 2022 04:11 pm
matrixmann: (Standing one's ground)
Here, with the war in Ukraine active soon-to-be for half a year, the world is still waiting for Russia to collapse under the consequences of that decision.
Instead consumer prices exploded around the world, certain goods have become even rarer than before after the slight relief of the global economy from Covid-19, and food supplies and heating have become not safe (the latter - let alone how much it will cost in the end and if you can afford it, if your wallet’s budget is tight).

May it not be that the community of the so-called “Western states” miscalculated in a very high degree in this issue?
matrixmann: Determined (Yuber Suikoden I)
Just because Europe and the Western world is used to borders not changing anymore in its own sphere since the end of WWII, it doesn’t mean that they can’t and the end of history has been reached.
Nation-building and -forming is still an ongoing, dynamic process. It can still undergo changes.
In the rest of the world it even does so.
matrixmann: Determined (Yuber Suikoden I)
Hopefully those countries which now file their applications for becoming a member of the NATO don't forget that membership doesn't only mean getting "safe from a Russian invasion", but also, whenever the United States are up in a war again with anyone, they're firmly part of the cleanup squad then after that skirmish.
matrixmann: (Black suits comin')
Just a critical question: US gun control activists - where are you if it's about the countless US foreign military aid and the guns it sells to the rest of the world? On top, to partly dubious and shady places, organizations and groups?
You also just stand ready for action if it's about your precious kids who could get shot at school or at their college by some weirdo or a kid from their own ranks that was bullied for all its life! If this shit can affect yourself, you feel the urgent need to do something against it - for example, to call for laws that are unrealistic that don't solve any problem.
But if the dying happens thousands of kilometers away from you, if it's not your kids who die, not your spouses, friends and relatives, you're nowhere to be seen, like you don't give a damn.
You know what? In your case, it stinks of typical narrow-mindedness, the usual US-centrism and it reeks of paid activism.
You just only care about something if it happens next door or the people who could be affected by it could be someone you personally know. If it could be somebody you hold dear.
You don't care a single bit about the general concept and anything else outside of your narrow ken that you have picked for yourself to act outraged!

Fuck you, people, FUCK YOU!
And fuck your stupid claims to care about people who die through firearms!
You're just a bunch of clowns in town!
matrixmann: (Default)
2007: A student of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (short: Virginia Tech) in Blacksburg, Virginia, commits a mass shooting, killing 32 people and wounding 17. After that, he takes his own life.
As a legacy, leaving behind a personal case history of mental dysfunctionality and a society, school and legal system who were both neither able to properly recognize his psychical shortcomings, nor to handle these accordingly and help them as needed.

Until the shooting of a self-sworn Jihadist in an Orlando gay nightclub in 2016 and the Las Vegas shooting of a sniper from a hotel room on visitors of a nearby music festival in 2017, this particular mass shooting remained the deadliest one committed by a single perpetrator in US history.
matrixmann: Perceiving a grain of sand in the desert (I see with the eyes of a hunter)
Any party going through with either their plans or already having banned imports of Russian oil and gas and replacing it with liquefied petroleum gas from the US - offically call their agenda to "fight climate change" broke and dishonest (if it ever even officially existed at all).
Because transporting LPG with tankers over half of the globe, burning fuel to deliver fuel, there's nothing more harmful to the world climate than this in this aspect of the economy and regarding general supply with common contemporary energy carriers.
Not even talking about needing to make the energy-intensive efforts to first liquefy the gas to transport it and then turn it into gas again, sacrificing additional amounts of energy, when it's reached its destination. And the terminals that have to be specifically created and built in order to execute both jobs.
matrixmann: (Black suits comin')
Madeleine Albright

(insert "Straight to hell"-jingle of your own choice here)
matrixmann: (Dark (1))
The way times are like now, one would even wish to go back to the days of just ranting about the woke mob in social media and the entertainment industry...

Profile

matrixmann: (Default)matrixmann

Tags

September 2025

M T W T F S S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Statistics


Free counters!

Free counters!
Page generated 4 September 2025 12:28 pm