Wartime

Wenn sich jemand fragt, warum die Bahn als Massentransportmittel, in einer Zeit, in dem aus Gründen der Reduktion von Emissionen, die durch den Transport von Menschen und Gütern verursacht werden, die Rolle eben solcher wieder in den Mitelpunkt rückt (es jedenfalls sollte), so schlecht aufgestellt ist - man werfe dafür einen Blick zurück in die Vergangenheit.
Man erinnere sich an die Mehdorn-Jahre (Ende 1999-2009), in denen die Bahn radikal kaputtgespart wurde, und man erinnere sich an das größenwahnsinnige Ziel, die Deutsche Bahn an die Börse bringen zu wollen.

Darum gibt es heutzutage keine Züge, kein Personal, ein unzureichendes Gleisnetz, keine Elektrifizierung und eine Menge verfallener kleiner Bahnhöfe verstreut über das ganze Land.

You know what’s going to be the biggest factor getting in the way of soothing the extent that climate change will have on this blue sphere here?
The international community outside of the Western countries gives a fuck about so-called “green technologies”. They care more about their own development, which had been kept down for centuries by the plundering of the dominant European and North American countries. And that means, cheap energy accessible to the biggest mass of people and local industries carries more importance than making it as exclusive as it can get through applying complex and expensive technologies in the chain, which the bigger parts of the population in the first world countries are able to afford (in whatever way possible to individuals).
The mindset of the Western world and what they think of as “problems” is so far away from those of the rest of the world - literally elevated thousands of kilometers above the ground, figuratively.

So are many other issues such as that of a cultural nature, for example.
The rest of the world literally doesn’t care about the gender-fantasies of twenty-somethings in the US or Europe and their dreams of deconstructing the biological base of the two sexes. Or about rainbow flags, pride months and loudly celebrating LGBT minority rights like they would be a cure against HIV and cancer altogether (rights which quite a chunk of areas in the world don’t have anyway).
There are way more urgent problems to them than such boredom- and living-in-security-driven ergotherapy of emphasizing things that revolve around the aspect of the anthropocentric worldview to overestimate the social ongoings between humans in a society.

To the rest of the world, the classic aspects of the mindset of the anthropocentric worldview are important: Where do humans get a space to live, a roof over their head, food and water for humans, jobs to earn money and chances to procreate - as well as chances to feed that offspring and raise it into an adult.

If you want to get the rest of the world into the same boat as the culturally loony Western part of the planet, then you first rather need to get them to abandon their part of the anthropocentric worldview, in which all natural resources of the planet exist just to serve and be consumed primarily by humans. - Including your own focus where human business and social interaction still also overshadows everything, beside you talking about “wanting to save the world” and “protecting the environment” (inconsequently).

Any party going through with either their plans or already having banned imports of Russian oil and gas and replacing it with liquefied petroleum gas from the US - offically call their agenda to "fight climate change" broke and dishonest (if it ever even officially existed at all).
Because transporting LPG with tankers over half of the globe, burning fuel to deliver fuel, there's nothing more harmful to the world climate than this in this aspect of the economy and regarding general supply with common contemporary energy carriers.
Not even talking about needing to make the energy-intensive efforts to first liquefy the gas to transport it and then turn it into gas again, sacrificing additional amounts of energy, when it's reached its destination. And the terminals that have to be specifically created and built in order to execute both jobs.

Thinking deeper about it, there is a little aspect to point out which surely won’t be irrelevant to the protests against the Covid vaccinations and the conspiracy theories surrounding them all around the world - and in which, bizarrely, these have something in common with the “Fridays For Future” movement:

It’s that if a civilization reached such technological, scientific and cultural heights and masses of general means and gadgets that it starts to forget the very base it stands on.
It takes the safe bubble it created to live in as self-evident and as the original state of nature.
While actually it’s the most unnatural state of things. And you have to do something for it in order to exist.

For example: The effect of vaccines first becomes noticeable if they weren’t given anymore.
If masses of people didn’t receive them.
As vaccines against the famous diseases you can vaccinate against didn’t exist, people died way earlier than today, they died of way more trivial causes, a lot died before they got 18 years old (high rate of child mortality), and people who survived infections with either a virus or bacteria way more often carried lasting damages away from this (often: early childhood) encounter into their adult lives.
This is still the case in places on the earth where these vaccines aren’t available or too expensive for an average person to get.
So when they were invented and people realized infants as well as themselves stopped getting sick and die from those diseases after they were vaccinated, people became clear of a reason to do this for. - No more getting sick, suffering and dying from crap that can be avoided.

A huge example that people of all ages have a personal benefit from is the tetanus vaccination.
Before that, just a single scratch could lead to this type of infection, which in the end paralyzes the nerve tissue that controls muscles in the body and leads to death.
And it’s barely avoidable as the bacterium that causes it lives in nearly everything. It’s everywhere around you.

So so-called “skepticism” and active refusal and even claims like “vaccination is murder” are actually a call to fall back to these circumstances among the population.
How can anyone be so stupid to want that?
Well, the best answer to this is: Because people aren’t aware of why they can lead such a cozy life. Lack of basic education and a lot of manipulative info from sources that function no better than hocus pocus magical crap made to make money that was sold to people in the Middle Ages are to blame for this.

In common with “Fridays For Future” this state of the mind has: Also the members and agitprop activists of this movement aren’t aware of what the order they raise their claims on comes together from.
For example, they take for granted that smartphones exist, that the internet and their platforms to communicate on globally exist, that they live a life on earth where they don’t need to mind neither money nor material if they get sick of something and can simply throw it away as they please.
But all that first needed to be invented, then needs to be fabricated constantly and then needs to be maintained constantly.
Electricity isn’t produced by the wall because the wall is kind of bored and doesn’t know what to do with its time. It’s produced in a power plant, that power plant needs any type of “fuel” or gizmo that moves another gizmo, whose movement generates the electric energy in the end that they take from the wall socket at home. And that needs to be done constantly, not just whenever you want. - Or you’ll have to accept that electric energy isn’t constantly ready to use.
Means of saving energy for later aren’t invented yet, and as it it looks it will be like with rechargeable batteries: It ain’t lossless and the energy saved will vanish over time when not using it. - Unless you’d save the energy compressed in something material that you can easily store and backlog (that would be fossil fuels like coal, gas and petrol, for example).
Not to forget: A power plant producing electric energy first needs to be built in order to serve the purpose to supply you with electricity in the wall socket.

The self-evidence of the presence of the internet is another issue of that umbrella.
The internet comes together by thousands of servers (and, in a simple sense, “computers”), interconnected with each other, running 24/7 all around the year. If you think that you can only switch these on when you need them, then most of the time nobody will be able to read your crap.
Because these computers keep masses of data ready to access for whoever wants to read them at any time of the day. - All the viewers that checked your stuff in the meantime you slept, worked or were at school, they could do that because someone else keeps your data ready and accessible all the time.
If your data didn’t lie on someone else’s server, you’d have to keep your own computer plugged to the net all around the clock, even when you’re absent and not at home, or nobody could read the crap that you post and pay attention to you.

Thousands of computers running at the same time, waiting for somebody to seek a connection with them with his personal computer or cell-phone - anyone who isn’t stupid gets an idea what kind of huge effort that is to keep up every day?
The internet isn’t “simply there”, it’s a complex infrastructure, like a net of tarred roads that you can comfortably drive on, and to be “there”, it needs to be made to come into existence.
Another thing that you have to keep ready to use and cannot just switch on and off whenever you want to use it yourself. The effort made in order to keep it up has to be constantly the same at all times or it won’t work as well as you know it.

Not even to get started on the third example: Their own lifestyle and the lifestyle of the family they live in...
Their parents go to work daily, in most cases don’t share a car because they’ve got to go to two completely different places, their parents don’t work near their home but in other towns and commute, they want to make it to buy a nice house, own a big car, save money so each of their kids can have a driver’s license and an own car as soon as the kids are legally permitted to drive, want 1 or 2 family vacations each year at least - and they don’t want their kids to miss any trend in order to not be socially excluded among their peers.
Last but not least, they also try to save up money from anywhere, on top, to send their kids to university (like university wasn’t something which you have to have the brains first and you can’t tell that from the first day of a child’s life).
All that until the kids get “aware” (their “Fridays For Future”-type of getting “aware”).
Anyone of them who pointed it out to themselves how much of an ecological footprint that already is until they reach “awareness”?
And that’s not even counting their own behavior in this calculation...

Reduced and collected in a short summary that is: No, kiddo, you’re not going to save the world now by going vegan, eating meat-replacement made from soybeans, peas and wheat!
Which, by the way, doesn’t reduce your footprint very much if they actually come from Brazil, like the beef steaks you ate before. (Anyone who praises the meat-replacement products asked where the substance they’re made of comes from?)

And, talking about “recycling”, how about that you wear the clothes of your elder siblings that are still alright - like poor people do?
Or that you use a technical gadget for 10 years or more? Repair it? Tinker around with it, so it can still be of service with new technical standards? Use it until it literally falls apart?
“Learn from the poor” is the correct motto in this issue, just as a reminder, not holding big public speeches and claim whatever the heck comes to your mind from adults how they shall behave.

By the way, skipping school to march on a rally - do these kids have any idea what kind of privilege they throw away thoughtlessly for just a little stomp on the ground of their inconsistent minds?
Kids in Africa and India and whatever places on earth not as rich as the first world dream of going to school instead of having to go to work and already earn some, so the family, including them, has something to eat and doesn’t need to freeze.
School is like the key to a better life, to more life quality and to a better job - and these kids take it so much for granted that they think they can spare it!!
Not even to speak of that they seem to think school without paying hundreds of bucks for it is a world standard!
If their rallies had a connection to something that went wrong in school, but no... it’s about “pointing the adults at doing something to stop climate change”.
Like - next time they go on a strike because the pocket money is too low...

This is social relations, making a plea, not doing something for a certain objective.
And then formulating one’s plea on a pretty high niveau of prosperity. Leaving one’s own role aside, acting like one doesn’t exist and does nothing wrong, but only all other people.

...You see how both have a similarity here?
Avoiding to mind one’s own base of a living, sect-like structures that want to make everyone convert, but they have very few to really say if you check them in the details.
If you fact-check them or check for doability, you find them two live in a dreamy world made of soap bubbles. Harboring an image of the world that doesn’t correspond with the reality.

When do you encounter such phenomena?
Mostly when a civilization is almost at its end. When people forget what their life as they know it is based on and take it for granted that they can eat grapes all day long (figuratively). And, on the other hand, can afford to dive deep down into their human interactions all day long. Be busy with the “he says, she says” and what is the correct way to worship and appreciate whatever the heck.
Act like their human quarrels are the most important thing in the world, like someone is watching and only waiting to interfere and deliver them from their anger towards each other.

(Someone discovers similarities in this description too?)

Some observation that I have made regarding this current zeitgeist and the mindset of the new young generation (time-wise to be sorted as “Generation Z”):

Previous generations were oriented towards “making it themselves”, achieving something through their own powers and skills, having internalized the rule “there is no gain without effort before”.
They show the tendency, if wanting a particular item or non-material good, to first start to rack their brains how they can get to their goal themselves and do rather ask for help in order to add strength to their own efforts or because someone else might have the direct competence over what they wish.
Problems are regarded as their, and only their, issue and they try to solve it themselves, even if having to dare trying a few times.

While the new young generation (aka “Generation Z”) has a somewhat strange and totally different attitude to take life on.
The most their mindset reminds oneself to a child which constantly heads over to Mom to appeal to her whenever they’re confronted with anything they don’t know or harbor the feeling about that they can’t overcome it through their own abilities.
They quickly reach out for help - but not in order to strengthen their weak powers; they directly want someone else to do the job for them at best. Without having to do or invest anything of their own energy in it.
Also, they quickly give up if something doesn’t work as they have imagined it to. It’s like no-one ever taught them that trying eventually leads to success - by making mistakes, by correcting them the next time, until their dexterity and skill level is high enough so that they can overcome the obstacle or master the task given.
And their imaginations about how something works are also very naive, incomplete, overly idealistic, utopian. Lacking firm knowledge in practical things, as well as what particular entities in this world do and how they are interconnected with each other.

The question of social justice is also very differently understood in their grasp of the human world.
While the previous generation believed in own action and had trust in what their own hands can shape, the new young generation bets on inability to cause influence on their fate through their own powers and believes in systematic predetermination based on one’s flesh. On one’s overall bodily features, one’s inborn desires, one’s national and/or cultural heritage - like talent is everything that makes the shooting star and not honing the raw diamond into a jewel.

Again, features of a situation like a child steadily heading over to Mom and appealing to her to do something for oneself come to show.
Everything is and/or has to be perfect from the start, there is no trying or that trying creates the masterpiece. You are what you are born as and can’t get any step further than that. So the world, instead, has to have regard for you all the time and take into account your inborn features.
It has to deliver you what you need to live and what you desire, like owning something to you for never lending a dime, and if the world doesn’t comply with the claim, it’s evil, oppressive - people who get it even though are “privileged” and not maybe have done something to receive anything back, didn’t deserve it by the efforts of their hands and mind.

In other words, you can also compare it to a dogmatic faith to a deity. The deity gives, the deity takes, but humans themselves are powerless and need to rely on the mercy of the God they worship.
But without the duty to bring up material sacrifices and do everything it takes to have the attention and satisfaction of the deity, so that it will continue to drop gifts to them which they live of.
A total “the sky drops what I need, and if doesn’t drop anything, I’ll wait forever until it does”-mindset. Dependence and unspoken claims that are being mistaken as self-evident in life.

Like a kid which never was allowed to live on its own - also, like a kid which understood that you best make it to your goal if you let other people do the job for you.
And the kids were seemingly born into surroundings and a larger social culture which uncritically complied with that strategy. Which didn’t ever really raise a finger and said “Hey, kid, nothing is for free and you’re already big enough to do something on your own, you’re not in my womb anymore and need extra-protection!”.
Which easily danced according to their pipe, if they learned how to twist people around their little finger safely.

Even their kinds to act out violence seem influenced by this “other people do what I want them to”-circumstance.
While in the previous generation, direct violence and direct duels to settle something were still common, including the unwritten rule of “mercy for the one who lost”, the folks from Generation Z have internalized all imaginable types of passive-aggressive violence: Bullying, deceiving, lying, provoking, offending, frazzling out, hunting one down with online-harassment and photographs etc..
Types of violence that always make them look like they haven’t done anything wrong and the victim is the evildoer if it reacts to their acting or loses it.
And if they practice direct violence, you’ll experience it rather as an unstopped orgy to spill blood - because something like the unwritten rule “mercy for the one who lost” doesn’t exist for them. Empathy for one’s victim doesn’t exist, complete and total destruction is what they seek - and they also greatly underestimate their own physical powers. How quickly their beating and kicking can kill someone or at least harm the person irreversibly for life.

Again, like a mommy’s darling. A spoiled brat which barely ever heard the world say “no” to its wishes, who never learned how to deal with this denial emotionally - with this realization “the world isn’t entirely about me” -, and which, on the other hand, wasn’t taught much of anything how this world actually works. How very, very not bad it is if they have to find something out on their own and that it takes time to become.
Also, which forgets that even mommy is a human being, that she isn’t an unquestionable God, so that she automatically distributes resources and gifts completely fairly.
Meaning, that if claiming social justice on a larger level of society, it’s also going to be carried out by humans and they can all be biased towards or against somebody or a whole group. The firm “universal social justice” that lasts for all days they seek is actually a myth, a dream.
Much rather it’s like a constant fight, a constant struggle for realignment that happens every now and then.

Such is life which requires permanent effort to harvest fruits of success, and not one big new re-arrangement how resources will be distributed and everything will be fine from then.

According to how this young generation is minded and what it demands from the world (socially as well as politically), you can always puzzle together an image of how they must have been raised to become like this...
And - this cannot have been a good base.

If people get so confused about their identity, if they’re male or female, if they have no proper differentiated understanding that they can have psychical shares of both sexes and need a new word for it (like it’s an unknown species that no-one has previously discovered or dared to give a name to), if they are clueless about a personality generally being fluid to a certain extent (that’s what you call “moods”)... Then they cannot have been properly welcomed and introduced to the world.
More than that, they must have been given nothing to orientate by.
Not properly developed, they wander through an endless fog of uncertainty...
Parents who weren’t good at nurturing - society which wasn’t good at delivering clear rules and structures.

Imagine living in a spooky amusement park, and you don’t know what’s right and what’s wrong to take of its rides.
Or what of them may behead you.
That’s what they originally tumbled around in life, and while growing up they have adapted to these surroundings. Adopting the habit to not do anything themselves, or doing it just for the positive reaction they get, and rather try to get other people to do something particular for them who they witness at being more skilled, for example.
Performing the behavior of a little child rather than that of an adult.
Learning how to do all those techniques to pretend, deceive and manipulate which their parents already used to hide and mask the lack in character and cognitive skills they already had.


...If you ask me, if nobody seriously tries to make up for all the stuff this generation missed with them together, you don’t want to see the day when the members of it become parents.
‘Cause they’re going to suck big style and leave behind an even more cognitively and mentally neglected generation than the ones before as a Generation Z.
And, actually, if you’re fair and took it on from the root, you’d also have to sit down with the parents from Generation Y and X over their own personal deficits - because it’s them who bred the generation debated about.
Something must have happened or changed drastically in the surroundings these lived in as adults, from when they were children and teens themselves, so that they raised such kids.

Americans don’t find they got anything in common with each other, nothing really UNITES them. That’s why they need such opposing groups like women and men, black and white, Democrats and Republicans, LGBT and the majority of vanilla sexuality practitioners, Christian religion and all others (including atheism), hillbillies and academic cosmopolitans etc. or artificial enemy images lurking in the world outside the US which must be fought and not let inside their circle.
They need to artificially declare people to be homogeneous and put them into a drawer that actually isn’t as uniform as they pretend to themselves because otherwise they don’t find anything posing an overlap in personal interests that would generate a substantial reason to cooperate.

(Warnung: 18+ Thema! --- Warning: 18+ topic! --- Внимание: 18+ тема !)

---

Hat einer schon mitgekriegt, dass man im Schatten von Corona versucht, den in Deutschland legalen Teil des Escort- und Prostitutionsgewerbes abzuwürgen?

Für alle möglichen - auch unvernünftige - geschäftlichen Aktivitäten versucht man irgendeine Lösung zu finden, damit diese wieder betrieben werden können und der Staat diese nicht aus seinem Säckl am Leben erhalten muss.
Schon wochen- und monatelang wird immer mal wieder angeführt wie lang angeblich Corona-Viren auf einer Türklinke überleben, die ein Infizierter angefasst hat, und wie gefährlich faktisch schon das Verlassen der eigenen Wohnung ist. Umgekehrt werden Lösungen für den Profi-Fußball gesucht, für Teile des Motorsports (Formel 1) und sogar Abkommen mit Ländern geschlossen, damit deutsche Touristen wieder einreisen und ihren jährlichen Sommerurlaub machen können - entgegen jeder Beteuerung von Fachleuten, dass die recycelte Luft im Flugzug ein Sargnagel für das Infektionsgeschehen ist, sobald auch nur eine infizierte Person im Flieger sitzt, die Virenpartikel in den Umlauf bringt.
Auch Gottesdienste werden nach lokalen Ausbrüchen durch solche nicht wieder unterbunden, bei denen es dazu kam trotz Beachtung aller vorher ausgearbeiteten Hygienevorschriften!

Aber, in der neuen Corona-Verordnung des Landes MV vom 7. Juli (formell: GS Meckl.-Vorp. Gl.-Nr. B 2126 - 13 - 20) heißt es in Paragraf 2 unter Absatz 30: „Prostitution ist untersagt. Das Prostitutionsgewerbe ist für den Publikumsverkehr geschlossen.“

In jedem Medienbericht wird stets von großzügigen „Lockerungen“ gesprochen, aber was ist das?

Seit etwa Mitte März stehen diejenigen, die in diesem Gewerbe tätig sind, auf dem Schlauch und wissen nicht wie es weitergehen soll, weil ihnen durch die Verordnungen die Geschäftsgrundlage entzogen bzw. direkt die Ausübung ihres Gewerbes untersagt wird.
Dabei sind einzelne als „Selbstständige“ tätige genauso betroffen wie die großen Bordelle, denen man ihre Frauenfeindlichkeit stets nachsagt.

Für Frisöre hat man inzwischen Lösungen gefunden wie deren Dienstleistungen wieder angeboten werden können; Restaurants und Cafés dürfen auch schon wieder seit längerem öffnen; für Tattoo- und Massagesalons gelten jetzt auch neue Vorschriften, sodass diese wieder (allerdings mit Einschränkungen) arbeiten können - Tätigkeiten, welche ebenso nicht ohne engem Körperkontakt und wechselnden Kunden einhergehen!
Selbst Schwimmbäder will man wieder zur Saison auf kriegen...

Aber genau beim horizontalen Gewerbe, da weigert man sich nach wie vor, es in irgendeiner Form zu erlauben - obwohl es in den professionellen Etablissements deren eigener Standard ist, auf die Hygiene zu achten, weil diese nicht wollen, dass Krankheiten in ihre Häuser hineingetragen werden oder sogar die „Mitarbeiterinnen“ mit Geschlechtskrankheiten oder HIV infiziert werden.
(Gab es da nicht vor einiger Zeit sowieso mal einen „Brandbrief“ im Bundestag, der sich dafür engagierte, nach Corona die Bordelle nicht wieder aufzumachen?)

Liebe Spießbürger - auch wenn ihr euch das in eurem CDU-Hirn oder eurem westlich links-grün versifften Verstand, der ständig was von „Diskriminierung“ faselt, nicht ausmalen könnt, aber es gibt durchaus Leute, die auf diese Damen (und Männer!) angewiesen sind und die Dienstleistungen, die sie erbringen.
Es gibt eben Leute, die „keine abkriegen“, zu hässlich sind, zu alt sind, zu schüchtern sind, stottern, behindert sind (!) oder die, wenn sie ihre Wünsche und Fantasien einem/-r gewöhnlichen/-r Sexualpartner/-in vortragen würden, von diesem oder dieser achtkant mit der Beschimpfung „Du bist ja krank! Du bist ja pervers!“ aus der Wohnung geworfen werden würden.
Klar, man kann es in Frage stellen, warum ist es in bestimmten (hohen!) Kreisen üblich, nur mit einer hübschen Dame an der Seite zu einem wichtigen Geschäftsessen zu erscheinen - geht das nicht auch ohne?

Aber - denkt ihr tatsächlich, indem, dass ihr etwas verbietet oder unterbindet, werdet ihr es aufhalten?
Dann läuft die Sache eben illegal weiter, so wie es schon immer der Fall war.
Nur hier: Die ausführenden Damen und Herren sind wesentlich mehr der Willkür und den auch illegalen Wünschen der Kunden ausgesetzt, die sie buchen. (Ist das wirklich so gut, wenn gerade eine Seuche umgeht?)
Außerdem fließen aus illegalen Einkünften keine Steuern mehr in die Staatskasse.
JA-HA! Das sollten die hohen Tiere nicht vergessen! Alle, die mit ihrem Gewerbe in diesem Sektor angemeldet sind, zahlen Steuern wie jeder andere Werktätige - welche sehr wohl auch die Diäten der Politiker mitfinanzieren!

Es geht also nicht nur um irgendein unliebsames Gewerbe, bei welchem stets pauschal die Diskriminierungs- und Ausbeutungskeule geschwungen wird - seltsamerweise: ohne die Ausübenden mal vorher selbst zu fragen wie sie es empfinden -, sondern auch um etwas, was diesen Laden hier mitfinanziert!

Und der Verweis auf den noch größeren illegalen Teil des Gewerbes - Leute, das zieht nicht. Warum nicht?
Weil hier nur die Prostitution das Symptom ist, aber nicht der Grund, warum das Geschäft existiert.
Drogensucht und sonstige Not als Ursache sind soziale Probleme - um die sich gekümmert werden müsste, dann gibt es diese Art Nutten auch nicht.
Zwangsprostitution mit vornehmlich Osteuropäerinnen - erstens, dass dieses Phänomen seit den 90er-Jahren existiert und es bisher keiner geschafft hat, diesen Sumpf auszutrocknen (oder es gar nicht erst ernsthaft wollte?); und zweitens - warum landen die Frauen denn hier?
Weil es in ihren Heimatländern keine Zukunft und keine ordentliche Arbeit gibt, von der man leben kann. Ihnen werden Versprechungen gemacht von einem wohlhabenden Europa, was seit ca. 30 Jahren abgebrannt ist - den Männern übrigens auch. (Was ist mit denen? Oder sind Arbeitssklaven etwa weniger wert als Zwangsprostituierte?)
Also - wieder strukturelle, soziale und jetzt auch wirtschaftliche Probleme.
Einen Funken Bildungsferne könnte man dort noch hineininterpretieren, denn wie naiv und leichtgläubig muss man sein, auf jemandes blumige Versprechungen ‘reinzufallen und zwischendurch nicht einen Deut Skepsis an den Tag zu legen?

Das sind alles, bei noch nicht einmal sehr detailgenauer Betrachtung, alles Probleme, die hinter dieser Form der Prostitution stecken und gelöst werden müssten, dann würden diese Frauen (und Männer!) nicht mehr unterdrückt und gingen einem Gewerbe nach, was sie sich selbst ausgesucht haben.

...Na, klingelt es jetzt langsam?
Kapiert ihr allmählich, dass man mit einem Berufsverbot diese Zustände nicht unterbunden kriegt?
Sondern nur diejenigen damit bestraft, die es ehrlich betreiben?
Als auch diejenigen, die es in Anspruch nehmen, und denen es selbst nicht scheißegal ist, ob die Nutten, mit denen sie schlafen, schlecht behandelt werden?

Vor einer Weile gab es einmal den geflügelten Spruch „Das muss eine Demokratie aushalten!“ - und ja, hier ist der definitiv anzuwenden. Eine sich „freiheitlich“ und „demokratisch“ schimpfende Ordnung muss das aushalten - so etwas nennt sich „Fairness“.
Die Fairness, dass jemand etwas tun darf, was keinem anderen schadet, mit dem beide (oder mehrere Teilnehmende) einverstanden sind, und das man selbst nicht nachvollziehen kann.
Leben und leben lassen.

Wenn ihr dazu schon zu dumm oder zu eingebildet seid, diese Kontrollsucht zu unterlassen, was Leute wann tun, mit wem und aus welcher Motivation, dann sollte man mal jemand ganz anderes auf sein sogenanntes „Verhältnis zu Demokratie“ auf Herz und Nieren prüfen.

(Übrigens: Schon mal davon gehört, dass man mit Porno, Masturbation und legaler Prostitution Vergewaltigungen entgegen wirken könnte? Wenn „pussy“ nämlich breit verfügbar ist, kann man es erst recht jemandem zum Vorwurf machen, wenn er noch den „Zwang“ dazu sieht, sie sich mit Gewalt zu verschaffen. Allein schon wegen der Dummheit und der geistigen Unfähigkeit, es sich nicht auf eine Art und Weise besorgen zu gehen, ohne dass dabei jemand anderes zu schaden kommt!)

Regarding the zeitgeisty mumbo jumbo surrounding a 16-year-old girl from Sweden named Greta Thunberg, it's always good to remember the past and bring it upon the table: There have been other environmental activists before, acting even more fierce than her and following a recognizable agenda instead of a plain social media hype that still lacks content after months.
One of these people was a Swiss man named Bruno Manser.

(Thanks to a person I only got to know under the nickname "Sanni" for once teaching me about him.)

"Wanting to protect the world climate, you have to face one important fact: Economic growth (in the Western world) still and trying to only stop the man-made destruction of nature are two things which don't fit together. They're paths running into opposite directions.
To really turn back the cogs of time in order to spare yourself and future generations the worst means you have to go back towards the living standard of the 70s of the wealthy nations and the world population has to halve at least, if you want every human to have the same wealthy living standard. Nothing going in there anymore with "I want my lovely two kids per relationship" - NO! To say it really evil: At best you even die before you get 40, and at best you didn't leave behind a child until then.
That's how drastic it is.
And the healthier people want to be personally, the less people can walk on earth enjoying it as their lifestyle.
You ask why the animals die out and keep disappearing? Think for a minute: Who conquered the living space that was taken away from them? Who occupies the space they lived in before? Seven and a half billion answers are walking out there. Human species took that territory, spreading like a virus. Where humans live, barely other animals live in anymore.
So... you get it what even more "growth" would mean for the environment, for the nature of this planet?"