Trickster

[matrixmann]

Western journalism offers a strange habit: All the time spitting hot air, they state a lot of things like they're already proven truth, but don't bring up any solid evidence to the scene. Lies become the truth. Mistakes become the truth. And never there would be an apology or a correction of the facts, if they were reported falsely.

Comments

[matrixmann]

I also wouldn't know how you could do that. If you watch some different kind of news, either you have to be aware of this NWO-like nonsense, or the rest of the self-called civilized world shouts "you're watching Russian propaganda!".
At the moment the quality of news and journalism that comes from Russian sources really mixes up the market, that's something you need to admit, whether you like it or not. The more you keep investigating it, you - beside the content differences - you notice the difference in the working process. What reports and articles are made like. Frankly, actually they don't even need to spread propaganda on purpose, the propaganda writes itself by the reality that takes place. Even though you also have those privatized media corporations existing on their sides.
It really challenges the market in the Western states - but what comes as a reaction out of this cultural circle are accusations, offenses, trials to limit their spread and their radius to work in (short time ago, some financial assets of the news agency Rossiya Segodnya had been frozen in the UK due to that their boss was put on the list of sanctioned people). Literally, sabotage instead of maybe taking it as a challenge to produce better media content themselves again.