matrixmann (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
matrixmann) wrote2014-05-10 02:48 pm
matrixmann) wrote2014-05-10 02:48 pm
Entry tags:
The C-word
The wider you turn West the more the only association to Communism seems to be the Soviet Union.
Smart mind wonders why since it was not the only country which proclaimed to follow this kind of system. Think of Cuba, think of the GDR, think of Venezuela in these days.
It also appears to happen that people closely link the matter of corruption to the system of Communism, rather than to Russia itself - because it was the way in the Soviet Union.
Further look would tell them that corruption is not a matter of a political system. The cronyism-society of current Western capitalistic system should be a good example to state that it's not filled with fairness too. Also it would tell them that corruption is a well-kept tradition on Russian territory, independently of who is the king now.
For the economy goes the same. It's not all about inefficiency and shortage, about being behind and living on a low standard. If you take the circumstances of the time into consideration, political isolation, economical isolation, putsches in fellow countries and many other aspects, you should get a different picture of the game. Including how the challanging economical circle worked its way out.
Additionally, before mocking take a look at your own system. Do you always get what you want? Do seller and manufacturers always offer you what you need?
What about the quality?
And - where do they take it from?
Considering all these questions makes the accusations and prejudices made to the C-word look less like they're fairly reasonable.
As it seems, it seems to be a question of knowledge. Do you know what you're talking about or do you repeat somebody's words without further investigation.
It's almost 70 years ago, but it seems like the Truman Doctrine still serves its purposes.
Even for those ones who weren't there or even know who he was.
Smart mind wonders why since it was not the only country which proclaimed to follow this kind of system. Think of Cuba, think of the GDR, think of Venezuela in these days.
It also appears to happen that people closely link the matter of corruption to the system of Communism, rather than to Russia itself - because it was the way in the Soviet Union.
Further look would tell them that corruption is not a matter of a political system. The cronyism-society of current Western capitalistic system should be a good example to state that it's not filled with fairness too. Also it would tell them that corruption is a well-kept tradition on Russian territory, independently of who is the king now.
For the economy goes the same. It's not all about inefficiency and shortage, about being behind and living on a low standard. If you take the circumstances of the time into consideration, political isolation, economical isolation, putsches in fellow countries and many other aspects, you should get a different picture of the game. Including how the challanging economical circle worked its way out.
Additionally, before mocking take a look at your own system. Do you always get what you want? Do seller and manufacturers always offer you what you need?
What about the quality?
And - where do they take it from?
Considering all these questions makes the accusations and prejudices made to the C-word look less like they're fairly reasonable.
As it seems, it seems to be a question of knowledge. Do you know what you're talking about or do you repeat somebody's words without further investigation.
It's almost 70 years ago, but it seems like the Truman Doctrine still serves its purposes.
Even for those ones who weren't there or even know who he was.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-06-03 03:48 am (UTC)(link)This current economic system of greed is unsustainable.
Any plan that the 1% can take care of themselves and everyone else can go to hell will not end well.
no subject
Watching every "crisis" or "war" that the US has been joining over the last couple of years, you get the impression like the end is so near you can already feel it.
For sure no one wanted to hear "it's going down!" before the Soviet Union fell, perhaps most citizens and even politicians didn't even think of that. But - history tells how the story ended (until now).
Without any trial of insult, but that behaviour somehow rings a bell.
And it seems like there are people on that side now again which don't want to hear "it's going down!".