matrixmann (
matrixmann) wrote2015-09-05 06:42 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Equal
Is the reason for why militant veggies, vegans and animal protection advocates fight so uncompromisingly for animal rights because, when they think of "animals", they actually mean "mammals"?
no subject
no subject
What is different with them is what you find when looking at animals the rights advocates often engage for: Besides not looking pretty and "sweet", they can't be controlled and they don't respond to you. They don't talk to you or communicate in another way which a human is able to understand, and they have their own will. They follow what they want to follow.
That's all different with cats, dogs or pigs.
It wouldn't be the first and the last time people try to humanize animals just for the sake because they don't get along with fellow humans or surrender to some strange idea in their heads to try to create someone they can communicate with which is smaller or dependent on them. (Something similar happens when human children are born only because their parents want someone to cherish them.)