matrixmann: (Default)
matrixmann ([personal profile] matrixmann) wrote2017-02-03 11:09 pm

Techniques of war: Deterioration of infrastructure

Is there a different way to win a war than sending troops and artillery?
There is: Do it the subtle way. Destroy the infrastructure, by selling and privatizing, to let your opponent pay off debts that actually don't exist. Erase the ability to do self-catering with home-grown food, introduce the dependence on imports. Carry technology and patents out of the country. If human intelligentsia can't be lured away, make sure they can't make any profit out of their knowledge anymore - forbid them to work in their disciplines, declare graduations and diplomas to be invalid. Abolish law and order and take your sweet time to install yours as the new ones - to let chaos move in, and crime take hold. Additionally, send your own criminals in to fool the masses and to let the daily terror on the streets be perfect. Pump your own wares and goods into the newly acquired territory - to calm down the conquered masses and to make profit yourself; best even is if you let it be accompanied by advertising and propaganda how good it is, how grateful people can be to have it, meanwhile you can do the dirty work to strip them off their assets. While being at the assets: Rearrange the overall property situation. If the pattern makes sense or not, it doesn't matter - the confusion and the gain for your own fraction is the main objective.
At the end of it all, most importantly: Break the morale, the mindset of the people that you annex. Deconstruct the education system and build it anew. Let culture disappear to be never seen again. Kill the spirit of what made these people up! Make sure that way that you're going to be happy with your annexion for the coming decades - 'cause the resistance fades away with the people aging.

[identity profile] onb2017.livejournal.com 2017-02-04 04:53 am (UTC)(link)
Agree. Only I think it is happening naturally, like when profit is the priority all these things happen naturally and then a good way to get out of inevitable crisis is to start war. Otherwise totally agree.

[identity profile] onb2017.livejournal.com 2017-02-04 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
When the war is inevitable or during the war this strategy is exactly the case. Agree.

Nazi Germany?

[identity profile] onb2017.livejournal.com 2017-02-04 04:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Afghanistan? Then it is true about Iraq and Syria. And also Libya.

[identity profile] onb2017.livejournal.com 2017-02-04 06:13 pm (UTC)(link)
You mean Eastern Germany?

[identity profile] onb2017.livejournal.com 2017-02-04 06:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok, it is really interesting because you actually witnessed it so I suppose you have first hand knowledge. But I can say the same about the Soviet Union vs Russian Federation.

[identity profile] onb2017.livejournal.com 2017-02-05 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, totally, I see all the time the discussions online about such dumb misconceptions, they still truly believe that we lived in some prison, all wore uniform and they shot everyone for stepping out of line and we were so poor and run down, pretty much shacks and dirt roads. I sometimes cannot help but think: what kind of dumbasses believe that crap without verifying, meaning: do you people believe everything you are told? Those people consider themselves free-thinkers ironically.

[identity profile] onb2017.livejournal.com 2017-02-05 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I agree. And in capitalism even if the system doesn't fail yet everyone can fail any day. Like if you get sick or your house burns down or you lose someone close. I heard lots of stories like this, people never suspected their life would change and something happens and they have no security any more. But they think if they are prosperous at that particular point, it will be guaranteed forever or try to not think about it. That's why I think religion is important to them. It is like good luck for them.

That is why I think it is sometimes comfortable for people not think about things like that and also they are afraid of changes.