Firm roles

[matrixmann]

If men can't be discriminated, then what's it with fulfilling all of a woman's wishes? With treating her like a princess? Doesn't it discriminate someone to have to fit into a role where his main task is giving and providing and he wasn't even asked before if he's able to or even willing to do this all the time?

Comments

[maadmike.livejournal.com]

Yes, I also was speaking recently with my younger friends that all these good attempts to make the life of women better results only in making things worse cause men are getting afraid to be in lawful or any relations with women and having children now more and more, cause they have to pay for every little step they are making and if the tendency will progress then soon we will have something like - we look on woman and we are in debt for the rest of life, amen...

[matrixmann]

In Russia too? I mean, because it's a little different cultural circle than the West...
I don't know what to think of it. This whole focusing on skin color, biological sex, psychological sex and what not feels to me like somehing tries really big for shifting public attention into an area that very, VERY much distracts from the actual problems that makind has to face and which are all unsolved.
Instead of getting themselves solutions, people shall run into that direction to bash their heads in, everyone against everyone.
Seriously, it's a little feel of "every dystopia that some scify movie ever drew is a joke compared to this reality".

[onb2017.livejournal.com]

On the other hand, feminists went into extreme treating women equal to men so they expect you to lay pavement or cut with a chainsaw when it is sometimes physically impossible.

[matrixmann]

That might happen along with it - unrealistic expectations.
But that's why I also dropped that note.
Isn't it sexism too to force the other side into a firm role what they should deliver or give in "services" to women? (Don't just think sexually when I say "services", right?)
I mean - especially during these days where guys also have become good cowards which run at the first sight of complex problems -, who really suits a cliche of that men that are still able to do all the "classic" disciplines that once were associated with them?
I think that's pretty hard to find already during these days.
Enough of them already enjoy or prefer to not dirty their hands.
To meet a 40-year-old man which knows to build you a house is much greater in probability than to meet a 25-year-old which has any knowledge about this. Much more the opposite for latter: The 25-year-old also orders the craftsmen to come for that job because he somehow thinks "this kind of work is for those people who learned how to do it - I don't get my hands dirty from this primitive kind of work!". Saying, he doesn't order them to come because he has no idea about that kind of business, he orders them to come because he thinks this is beyond his niveau...
...So that's what there is to say about it, about the "being suitable for that role".
Other thing then is if you personally got the ambition to be able to do certain things, but you're not a superman. If you're not skilled in doing everything or your talents don't lie with those "classic" disciplines. (Some men, for example, know better how to cook than their girlfriends.)