About the former meaning of "Liberal" and "Open Society"

[matrixmann]

"Liberal" and "Open Society" once were fight terms in Cold War times, which practically meant "Nazis walking around freely and shaping society too".

The creation of these two terms and turning their meanings into something that people, without trace, feel connoted as "positive" until today, while what they practically meant was morally questionable, is like an absolute standard from a political propaganda handbook.
These days barely anyone would remember their original meanings and what they truly stood for in practical circumstances...

Take this into account the text time you describe yourself and your personal viewpoint with this.

Comments

[matrixmann]

Came to this viewpoint after hearing them also appearing on protests in the US and doing exact the same kind of activities they do here.
So that means the violence problem of the Anti-Fa isn't only a regional problem, limited to Germany or Europe, it's a general problem of the whole movement/organization.

You know, that's why there's a text in my DW community up for promo purposes dealing with this topic in RX's case as he had an attitude tending towards this.
Anit-Fa just destroys town and regards all cops as potential enemies - they don't try to build up anything alternative to the current structure, neither do they regard the cops standing opposite to them as potential allies who could fight for their cause too, if they thought it's right.
Which kind of normal society that doesn't want to live according to the rule of "the strong rule the weak" could regard these as bringers of personal gain?
I don't think there is any.