Western logic
15 April 2014 11:58 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
matrixmannWesterner's logic seems to be twisted up.
On one hand they jump blindly on the pony to put the same person into the corner of evil dictators and manipulators as their governments, but on the other they don't even question what their own government has to look for in a country far beyond their borders and they don't even execute a mission set up by the UN.
Let's say, if an "evil dictator" and "manipulator" repeats a thousand times that he doesn't interfere - perhaps it might not be true, but turn the eye on the side who claims that.
Not only that they bring no proof for their claim, what are the foreign ministers of several different countries and their presidents and vice-presidents looking for in a country they don't even have a border in common with?
What are they looking for there?
Do they even have a permission to have a say in that?
What is the definition of "interfering into internal affairs of a foreign country"?
Is it just sending your secret agents and provoke turmoil or isn't it also sending your front arse to twist somebody around his little finger?
Isn't constant advice from a few selected persons out of a certain cultural and stately circle also some kind of interfering in a foreign country's internal affairs - from the outside?
On one hand they jump blindly on the pony to put the same person into the corner of evil dictators and manipulators as their governments, but on the other they don't even question what their own government has to look for in a country far beyond their borders and they don't even execute a mission set up by the UN.
Let's say, if an "evil dictator" and "manipulator" repeats a thousand times that he doesn't interfere - perhaps it might not be true, but turn the eye on the side who claims that.
Not only that they bring no proof for their claim, what are the foreign ministers of several different countries and their presidents and vice-presidents looking for in a country they don't even have a border in common with?
What are they looking for there?
Do they even have a permission to have a say in that?
What is the definition of "interfering into internal affairs of a foreign country"?
Is it just sending your secret agents and provoke turmoil or isn't it also sending your front arse to twist somebody around his little finger?
Isn't constant advice from a few selected persons out of a certain cultural and stately circle also some kind of interfering in a foreign country's internal affairs - from the outside?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 15 April 2014 01:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15 April 2014 02:00 pm (UTC)You hardly find one who takes a closer look and summarizes who did what (of both sides) - instead if coming round the corner with something like "Putin's an old desperate grump who wants his bit of world domination"
I feel remembered to a lot of situations where overseas claimed the wildest stories about someone which later turned out to be a total fake - and their public sucked it in until the day it came out.