Liquefied petroleum gas from the United States - and what about climate change?

[matrixmann]

Any party going through with either their plans or already having banned imports of Russian oil and gas and replacing it with liquefied petroleum gas from the US - offically call their agenda to "fight climate change" broke and dishonest (if it ever even officially existed at all).
Because transporting LPG with tankers over half of the globe, burning fuel to deliver fuel, there's nothing more harmful to the world climate than this in this aspect of the economy and regarding general supply with common contemporary energy carriers.
Not even talking about needing to make the energy-intensive efforts to first liquefy the gas to transport it and then turn it into gas again, sacrificing additional amounts of energy, when it's reached its destination. And the terminals that have to be specifically created and built in order to execute both jobs.

Comments

[matrixmann]

Coal is one of the first things they want to get rid of here, straight after nuclear power...
The collieries in the Ruhr area are all closed already. And brown coal is a dogma of the West German greens that unconditionally needs to be abandoned, in their viewpoint.

Other than that, coal is a fail in technical terms: 30 years ago, most flats were still heated with stoves. But during the 90s, after the turnaround, they tore that out of most flats...

So, if things go on as they happpen today, it more looks like people will go the backyards, somebody from the neighborhood brings an old rusty (oil) drum with him from the basement, and then all will heat themselves through the fire that will be ignited in it. Like the homeless in the Bronx...