Gayropa ≠ gay
15 September 2014 10:06 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
matrixmannWarning: In some countries the following content may be 18+. However, this text is written according to the legal situation in the author's residental place. Continue at your own risk.
Gayropa (Гейропа), used as a term in Eastern hemispheres to mockingly describe Europe and the countries of the European Union. Associations may vary from "weakness" to the obvious, known in Western hemispheres too, but it also seems to cary a cultural aspect with it. "Gayropa is different from us, that's not what we want to live like". "We don't get the sense of it - so don't you stay away".
Stronger than in Western nations, the subject that this word tries to cover seems to be the fear of a country's nation being destroyed, by people refusing to get kids, by people deciding to live a life in constant ecstasy instead of going to work and fulfill their duties, by men and women stopping to behave like reasonable humans, by people getting softened and unwilling to do something for their country.
In Western nations, these arguments are also brought before when trying to denounce this way of life as unethical, but it seems like they don't care anymore. They don't need anyone to be partiotic or sacrifice himself for more than a job.
Western world depends on people not knowing what they do, people being too softened to stand up for anything and caring for inessential nonsense. If it was crowded with intelligent minds, its system would collapse.
They need them to be selfish and capricious like a little child.
In order to ensure that, they foster life circumstances and take advantage of the laziness and thoughtlessness of the people. Adults being too busy with their lives, having no time to educate the kids, sitting nearby and underestimating the power of screens. Mothers arguing "this little bit of watching TV won't hurt my child", parents discussing if their child needs a smartphone to be up to date in their social group.
Children get flooded with lots of knowledge they don't need to know. They get fixed on TV shows that teach them a whole lot of nonsense, but nothing about the reality around; they get shaped to gain trust in certain enterprises and later become their customers and they get trimmed to massive insatiability.
They don't get encouraged to develop values or something like a sense of justice, they don't receive incentive to share self-evidently or pay attention to starting with equal means.
First thing they get taught when they get outside is: Be the strongest, be deceitful and take what you want.
Adults aren't different either. Either grown up in this brainwashing or having turned to this in their later years, they also let themselves be controlled by what some editors invent or enterprises suggest. Rather they take for granted what a newly thought-up show tells them instead of a book whose knowledge has been proven for a couple of decades.
Awfully enough, they keep influencing each other. Telling themselves how much right and how much wrong the fiction is which they carry around in their heads.
But the very worse is: They don't realize how much it turns them into wimps.
It's not who they desire - it's feminization based on a cliché, the trashing of what they gain their knowledge from, the lack of teaching what is nessecary, the abscence of structure one can rely on.
How can you turn someone into a war hater? Teach him war is a game and everyone is going to leave the battlefield alive.
Western education has become a trash can; that is why they're weaklings.
They don't know what they can do effectively, and they don't care because they're busy with stilling their addictions at first.
They got used to their safe haven and that there's nothing they need to do.
This phenomenon is not solely reducible to a certain group with special preferations - it applies to all of them.
If you ask why there are no men in the West or wannabe strongs, then ask why their dads were so proud of them that they needed to disappear, why there's mostly women in educational jobs and why there's TV steadily addressing cliché womens' needs.
If you really are interested, ask why there's constant talking about losing weight on TV, about looking pretty, household hints, facebook trends, and why there's always a report about someone who wants to change sides from male to female but never the opposite.
They want them to be wimps! They want them to more care about the way they look than what's in their heads!
They want their boys to be dependent on their mothers and their girlfriends!
They want them to turn into a copycat of wimpish role model that they created!
The more they turn into, the more they can be controlled, addressed, manipulated by what these media say.
But if this specifically has to do with who you choose as a mate... Would you leave what you have and change to queer just because someone tells you to?
Media want to disgust. They want their audience to feel discriminatory saying something against running around like a parrot. They want them to solely link this kind of lifestyle with being gay.
They know nothing about the substance and they're not interested. Just the same as with the wars they report about. There's no other interest than selling, disgust, getting you stuck, and ratings.
What you see through them is nonsense.
If you really want to know what it's like, better ask the ones who are affected by it. And nobody else.
Gayropa (Гейропа), used as a term in Eastern hemispheres to mockingly describe Europe and the countries of the European Union. Associations may vary from "weakness" to the obvious, known in Western hemispheres too, but it also seems to cary a cultural aspect with it. "Gayropa is different from us, that's not what we want to live like". "We don't get the sense of it - so don't you stay away".
Stronger than in Western nations, the subject that this word tries to cover seems to be the fear of a country's nation being destroyed, by people refusing to get kids, by people deciding to live a life in constant ecstasy instead of going to work and fulfill their duties, by men and women stopping to behave like reasonable humans, by people getting softened and unwilling to do something for their country.
In Western nations, these arguments are also brought before when trying to denounce this way of life as unethical, but it seems like they don't care anymore. They don't need anyone to be partiotic or sacrifice himself for more than a job.
Western world depends on people not knowing what they do, people being too softened to stand up for anything and caring for inessential nonsense. If it was crowded with intelligent minds, its system would collapse.
They need them to be selfish and capricious like a little child.
In order to ensure that, they foster life circumstances and take advantage of the laziness and thoughtlessness of the people. Adults being too busy with their lives, having no time to educate the kids, sitting nearby and underestimating the power of screens. Mothers arguing "this little bit of watching TV won't hurt my child", parents discussing if their child needs a smartphone to be up to date in their social group.
Children get flooded with lots of knowledge they don't need to know. They get fixed on TV shows that teach them a whole lot of nonsense, but nothing about the reality around; they get shaped to gain trust in certain enterprises and later become their customers and they get trimmed to massive insatiability.
They don't get encouraged to develop values or something like a sense of justice, they don't receive incentive to share self-evidently or pay attention to starting with equal means.
First thing they get taught when they get outside is: Be the strongest, be deceitful and take what you want.
Adults aren't different either. Either grown up in this brainwashing or having turned to this in their later years, they also let themselves be controlled by what some editors invent or enterprises suggest. Rather they take for granted what a newly thought-up show tells them instead of a book whose knowledge has been proven for a couple of decades.
Awfully enough, they keep influencing each other. Telling themselves how much right and how much wrong the fiction is which they carry around in their heads.
But the very worse is: They don't realize how much it turns them into wimps.
It's not who they desire - it's feminization based on a cliché, the trashing of what they gain their knowledge from, the lack of teaching what is nessecary, the abscence of structure one can rely on.
How can you turn someone into a war hater? Teach him war is a game and everyone is going to leave the battlefield alive.
Western education has become a trash can; that is why they're weaklings.
They don't know what they can do effectively, and they don't care because they're busy with stilling their addictions at first.
They got used to their safe haven and that there's nothing they need to do.
This phenomenon is not solely reducible to a certain group with special preferations - it applies to all of them.
If you ask why there are no men in the West or wannabe strongs, then ask why their dads were so proud of them that they needed to disappear, why there's mostly women in educational jobs and why there's TV steadily addressing cliché womens' needs.
If you really are interested, ask why there's constant talking about losing weight on TV, about looking pretty, household hints, facebook trends, and why there's always a report about someone who wants to change sides from male to female but never the opposite.
They want them to be wimps! They want them to more care about the way they look than what's in their heads!
They want their boys to be dependent on their mothers and their girlfriends!
They want them to turn into a copycat of wimpish role model that they created!
The more they turn into, the more they can be controlled, addressed, manipulated by what these media say.
But if this specifically has to do with who you choose as a mate... Would you leave what you have and change to queer just because someone tells you to?
Media want to disgust. They want their audience to feel discriminatory saying something against running around like a parrot. They want them to solely link this kind of lifestyle with being gay.
They know nothing about the substance and they're not interested. Just the same as with the wars they report about. There's no other interest than selling, disgust, getting you stuck, and ratings.
What you see through them is nonsense.
If you really want to know what it's like, better ask the ones who are affected by it. And nobody else.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 15 September 2014 01:09 pm (UTC)I like living in a country of peace. I like knowing that the next state over isn't going to be lobbing bombs into my front yard. That doesn't make anyone weak.
It makes us peaceful. Peace means being able to focus on other things, however trivial that may be.
That said, I agree with A LOT of what you said here about priorities. Our peace SHOULD be allowing us to spread wealth and technology, but instead we hoard it. It's ridiculous.
(no subject)
Date: 15 September 2014 02:16 pm (UTC)As the EU progresses forward, the more the rivalry between France and Germany tends to show up again. United States turning their focus on South-East Pacific in regard to battle China. Putsches and upheavals in South-America which receive their payments from the sources they have got them the last decades from.
McCain on Maidan square (in Kiev), McCain's National Endowment for Democracy paying to Russian organizations for who knows what for...
Western hierarchy as it is (currently and for the past decades), it didn't came for peace. It came to conquer. Ever since what they've done to Syria and the Ukraine, it should be obviously.
There's no war in their own courtyard, but it doesn't mean they're as peacefully as they want to present.
Having no war in your space doesn't mean it can't come to you.
There's a lot of conflict potential in Western nations too.
Ethnics, seperatist tendencies, rich against poor, state against its own citizens - countries trying to block each other's power enhancement.
Means have come down to something different than tanks and aircrafts, but one needs to remember there never was such a long episode of no bombing in the Western world as after WWII.
It doesn't need to go on forever.
(no subject)
Date: 11 November 2014 06:44 pm (UTC)Du willst Kinder haben? Erzieh sie auch und verbringe Zeit mit ihnen.
Du möchtest Journalist sein? Dann recherchiere auch und bringe gut ausgeleuchtete und fundierte Informationen unter's Volk.
Diese Diskrepanz zwischen Rechte und Pflichten lässt sich aber bestimmt nicht nur auf die westliche Welt beschränken.
Gleichzeitig bin ich wahrlich nicht der Meinung, dass Vermehrung der einzige Weg ist, ein wertvolles Leben zu führen. Und es gibt eine Unmenge an Videospielen, die absolut großartig sind. Nicht alles, womit man seine Zeit verschwendet, muss immer konstruktiv sein.
Eine traditionelle Geschlechterrolle durch einen "modernen Lifestyle" auszutauschen, ersetzt noch lange keine Persönlichkeit. Aber ich verstehe ohnehin nicht, warum alles heutzutage so geschlechtsfokussiert betrachtet werden muss. Erkenne deine Möglichkeiten und Bedürfnisse, mach dir Gedanken über Ethik und richtiges Handeln und versuche das dann bestmöglichst in der Welt umzusetzen. Fertig.
Wen interessiert es da, ob du Brüste hast oder einen Penis? Keines davon macht dich irgendwie besser oder schlechter geeignet, moralische Entscheidungen zu treffen.
(no subject)
Date: 11 November 2014 10:06 pm (UTC)Es kamen mir zu viele Phrasen unter, bei denen dieses Thema mit militärischer oder gesellschaftlicher Kampfkraft vermischt wurde.
Es erschloss sich meinem Verständnis nicht, was dies beides miteinander zu tun haben soll.
Es ist nicht so, als wenn nur diese Art "Personen" ein dekadentes oder hasenfüßiges Leben führen.
Wenn man sich aber anschaut, was über diesen Personenkreis verbreitet wird, was tagtäglich über den Äther schwirrt, dann ergibt diese Eindruck einen Sinn.
Das Erste, was man von ihnen zu sehen bekommt, sind Klischeefiguren, Menschen, die auffallen. Männer, die sich wie halbe Frauen benehmen oder gar so kleiden, Frauen, die sich allenthalber in pornografischem Material (miteinander) so benehmen wie ein Mann es gerne sehen würde.
Diese Darstellung ist meilenweit von der Realität entfernt, aber es nimmt sich niemand der Darstellung der Realität an.
Die einzige Chance, sein Bild zu revidieren, ist faktisch jemanden zu kennen, der so ist, aber trotzdem seine Pflichten wahrnimmt. - Bevor dies allerdings passiert, hat man bereits weitere tausend Klischee-Abziehbilder gesehen.
Die Menschen im Ostblock sind (scheinbar) der Vorstellung unterlegen, dass dieser Personenkreis ein auffälliges und dekadentes Leben führt, dass sie ihre Pflichten nicht kennen, dass sie (alle) nicht dazu fähig sind, sich in die Gesellschaft zu integrieren, dass ihr Leben aus der Show besteht, welche man auf dem Christopher Street Day beobachten kann, und dass sie nicht ebenso in der Lage sind, sich verantwortungsvoll um Nachwuchs zu kümmern.
Mit anderen Worten, dass es ihre Nation zersetzt, dass es eine westliche Erfindung ist, und dass es ihnen nicht gut tut, wenn sie solche Menschen tolerieren.
(no subject)
Date: 12 November 2014 04:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12 November 2014 07:17 am (UTC)