Lost

17 July 2016 05:17 pm
matrixmann: (Default)
[personal profile] matrixmann
The bus stop turns into the youth club...
First love, first drink, maybe even first time getting physical. And lots of friends.
What has modern society to offer to its youngsters?
Living in sterile, mold-contamined, pimped up flats, celebrating their weekends in used up buildings whose purpose they know at the highest from when they were kids, offered consumer goods which they can never pay, jobs that don't exist and promises that never come into effect. On top, bags of clothes manifactured in the third world which they can cut and rearrange to show how run-down they are, and ugly hair-cuts which make them appear like they have some sort of problems.
Education somewhat is an alien concept, both in the way of knowledge about the world and emotional development.
They get handed a lot of toys and tools to get paid the time their parents haven't spend with them, but can't make up for the deep nothing they perceive.
Sold out worlds, they long for destruction, for the destination that remains for when there's no task for you or your body is plagued by diseases. Diseases the parents thought about in their selfishness "they will be able to get along with that". And they keep wondering why these kids in their selfishness for exstasy beget another aimless generation of kids accidently...
On the other hand, education in the form of learning in excess for those who can pay for it. Planning of futures until the age of 40, orchestrated and without a doubt that anything can come in between this. No guess of what poverty means, what deprivations means, not even that it exists at all or what life-threatening circumstances could be. A bubble which nothing goes wrong within.
In the end, the planning also reveals its shallowness: Getting education, getting jobs, founding families, reproduce, buying houses, buying cars - running around and following the established role model, without a thought for a deeper meaning, just as trying to get drunk and loitering around in derelict houses and on the streets. It's about running away and clouding your mind.
The middle class youngsters ignore in their planning, that their kids are going to have to fight even harder for getting jobs as there is limitation in this, so it is also done in a manner of feeding your ego, numbing your mind to prevent to understand something.
Whereas the kids which grow up in poverty rather get their kids unvoluntarily and suddenly start to get those dreams of a idyllic world that isn't reachable for them. If they do not turn out in the end to abandon them, to show them the true face of what their existence already is: Superfluous.

(no subject)

Date: 17 July 2016 04:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] red-child.livejournal.com

Tragedies are about. I'd, personally, like to see opportunity exist in an increased measure of independence from economic background. There are always way, but reaching prison is easier than reaching your dreams, yeah? Perhaps that sounds a little too pessimistic... However, I've honestly found an increased probability in encountering cheer amidst the poorer individuals in my area. There's a shift, living in the struggle where you're deprived of high-standing wealth seems to leave one more openly finding value in the company of other humans... More evenly. Do you ever see any such tendency?


I've been wondering for a while, what spectrum of wealth did you grow up with?

(no subject)

Date: 21 July 2016 12:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] red-child.livejournal.com
What I hear from people about how "wonderful" and "over with" the poverty of Germany became after the wall was torn down... I don't know that they'd even believe things are this way. They'd probably just pass it off; "every country has its problems" or "there are poor people in every part of the world". I know some who live in poverty... or some who have been in troublesome situations throughout life; they would be the most likely to be understanding.
I'm sorry things are this way.

I think you have told me too much, saying it is for "security reasons". Now my mind is tumbling around all sorts of imaginings. I promise: I will try to contain myself! You may always 'slap me on the wrist' if I ask what I shouldn't have.

Thank you for an interpretation that teaches me. I've seen/read this as a problem often, in other circumstances, the pattern may be seen as identical under certain forms of scrutiny.
Humans keep segregating themselves, and it keeps making problems. Do you think there is a way for both this 'segregation' and a sense of 'equality' to coexist?

(no subject)

Date: 17 July 2016 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mandarinsun.livejournal.com
This is really well written. Having the bus, at the beginning, provides a frame for it that is much better than just doing an angry rant. It's also from young people's perspective which also makes it different from previous posts.

(no subject)

Date: 17 July 2016 07:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mandarinsun.livejournal.com
Maybe, but I think you have potential as a writer, but you should try to do more like this one. It's tricky though, it's not like writing just pops out easily the way you would like it. Some books about writing that I liked while I was growing up said a writer should go for producing as much writing as possible while not censoring any of it and keeping it all and then going back and looking at it all and saying this sucks and this is better. That's what Natalie Goldberg says in her books about writing and it was useful to me.

You should read the series of five books by Karl Ove Knaussguard too- the My Struggle series. It seems to relate to what you and I do: kind of left wing frustrated working class male stuff. It is like a current movement, maybe it isn't a movement but I don't know what to call it- zeitgeist?- of being sick of globalization and the way multi culturalism currently works but now wanting to go to being conservative like old white people.

(no subject)

Date: 17 July 2016 07:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mandarinsun.livejournal.com
"The bus stopping at a youth club" makes it sound more like a story than a personal essay and stories are always more interesting to read. Maybe writers can play and go back and forth between categories of writing, but it is better to be working at it that way and not be approaching it the same way every time. Though I am not good at it yet.

Also, I was going to say that reading a lot seems to allow someone's writing to grow.

(no subject)

Date: 17 July 2016 06:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mandarinsun.livejournal.com
I think young people today are very social, and in their teenage years extremely happy, but very shallow. I saw a PBS Newshour piece about how digital natives, children that grew up online, are confused and anxious when they meet someone whose facebook profile, or social media profile, they have never seen. They really need to type or categorize everyone and maybe that is human nature, but often they type people into only two categories: young, hip, and multi ethnic like them or someone that is country, non urban, and hostile to them. I get teenagers that want me to be a Republican country guy all the time.

(no subject)

Date: 17 July 2016 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mandarinsun.livejournal.com
It feels to young people, adults have to be into hip hop music and popular culture for them to feel comfortable with them.

Maybe a big part of this though is that I've met and seen A LOT! of teachers that act like they are into hip hop and popular culture in order to relate better to their students and maybe they are into hip hop and pop culture a bit or a lot because of their students.

You don't have to be very passionate to appear or actually be into hip hop or popular culture. They are very shallow things to begin with.

It makes me think though that say in the 1950s, 1970s, or even the 1990s, a young person in school might feel that their teachers and professors were into things that were more mature and deeper than the shallow things that kids are into. But, nowadays teachers try to act like they are into the same things that teenagers are into, so why would a teenager feel like they should ever be more mature?

(no subject)

Date: 18 July 2016 04:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mandarinsun.livejournal.com
I agree, but it gets to be really complicated and your and my preference for teacher and student interaction would be called very conservative here and maybe in Europe too. There is this thing called Common Core which is the new educational plan here though it is becoming discredited. It is something that is done in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden- I think.

The idea is that students are now supposed to interact with each other about what they have learned. They are supposed to be ab;e to learn things more if they talk about them and write about them.

Also, teenage students like listening to each other more than adults. So, administrators and teachers try to encourage students, through rewards and such, to talk with each other as part of class time.

It is preferable now for a teacher to have students do group projects where they work with each other too.

Because of all this, teachers now are supposed to relate and be able to talk to students more which requires, or seems to require, liking many, or some, of the same things they do. So, teachers use examples of movie stars, pop culture things, bad movies, athletes, hip hop music, etc to relate to the teenagers.

(no subject)

Date: 18 July 2016 04:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mandarinsun.livejournal.com
Even if there wasn't common core though, the way schools keep order and discipline now is through rewarding students with trinkets and points and snacks and things. So, schools try to be "hip" and relate to students as much as possible. Some high schools I go to play hip hop music over the loud speakers as the teenagers walk from one class to another.

It can seem ridiculous, but if I was suddenly in charge of a high school of 3000 teenagers from low income areas, it is what i'd do too because it works. If you do the old school way and just warn, threaten, and punish students, they'd set fires and attack you and each other. In the past, teens at wealthy schools would behave because their parents would kill them if they didn't and teens at poor schools would just go to jail if they were awful.

I do think now that teens in wealthier neighborhoods still behave well in school because their parents would kill them, but in poor neighborhoods what I was writing about above happens. It is weird and like a propaganda community. Like I said though, it mostly works.

The best ones though use the rewards, but also have stern punishments at the same time like Saturday schools and a classroom full of like the 30 or so students that don't follow rules at all. In that classroom, there are like four adults and everything is watched very carefully.

Also, there are a series of different schools where teenagers that get kicked out go to.

(no subject)

Date: 19 July 2016 01:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mandarinsun.livejournal.com
There's some of that and the teenagers do seem to turn out missing grit and determination and give up easily and do heroin. On the ground at the school though, i can see why it is done this way. It would be much worse if all the schools and teachers were just angry at the students for not doing their work and flunked nearly all of them.

Maybe it is mostly just where I am, in Southern California. At the schools I'm talking about, the students really do need to be encouraged to try to do well in school at all. A lot of the students, from low income and minority homes, would just quit and stop coming.

Here there are junior colleges too. In Southern California there are like fifty or more of them! It is like junior colleges have become an extra two years of high school and high schools, which is where teenagers go, is now like preparation for junior college which is now like trade school. In the high schools now, teachers are trying to get students to learn to come to class, take tests, get assignments in on time, get along with others in classes, etc...

It is sad that it used to be much better than this and people should try to make it better. I think though that since the 1960s and 1970s or something the school system is suddenly responsible for all girls, all African Americans, all illegal immigrants from Mexico, all native born Mexican kids, etc... So, the schools are responsible for having all these people come to school, even homeless children- I think in the United States there are like a million homeless children, so it is something to just get almost all of them to understand what school is and how it works by the time high school ends.

There's a weeding out process too where maybe the worst two percent or something end up jail or keep getting separated from the regular student population by being expelled and going to worse and worse schools.

It is like when someone is 20 years old now, it is like they are what someone was like when they were 16 before. So, high school is like extended grammar school and junior college is like what high school used to be.

This all sucks for the top 10% of high schools like this though. I can see where they'd feel like it was mostly dumbed down, but actually surprisingly it seems like kids in like calculus and physics classes seem to like the new way these schools work. They love all the rewards and stuff.

I'm sure schools were much better in previous generations, but what are you going to do?

I will say the good side of the whole thing though is that I bet in previous generations there were a lot of teachers that were unscrutinized and were not really doing much and there is so much scrutiny now that this doesn't happen nearly as much anymore. Like, you can see all the young teachers getting arrested for sex with students. That is something good coming from the way it is now. It is really heavily analyzed and scrutinized and shit like that is caught almost right away.

(no subject)

Date: 17 July 2016 06:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mandarinsun.livejournal.com
Professors in the humanities in the United States make references to hip hop culture and probably even accept student papers that make a lot of hip hop references.

On one level, it might be ok if they were into hip hop, Nietzsche, Marx, and Freud, and I think in the past a lot of professors hoped that this is how it would work out, but in practice what happens is the professors are condoning and approving of hip hop and popular culture and college students never think of moving beyond it into something more substantial. In a way, hip hop can be confused with being substantial and deep because it is related to race relations, but it is also extremely shallow.

Profile

matrixmann: (Default)matrixmann

Tags

June 2025

M T W T F S S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16 171819202122
2324 2526272829
30      

Statistics


Free counters!

Free counters!
Page generated 7 July 2025 03:16 pm