![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The bus stop turns into the youth club...
First love, first drink, maybe even first time getting physical. And lots of friends.
What has modern society to offer to its youngsters?
Living in sterile, mold-contamined, pimped up flats, celebrating their weekends in used up buildings whose purpose they know at the highest from when they were kids, offered consumer goods which they can never pay, jobs that don't exist and promises that never come into effect. On top, bags of clothes manifactured in the third world which they can cut and rearrange to show how run-down they are, and ugly hair-cuts which make them appear like they have some sort of problems.
Education somewhat is an alien concept, both in the way of knowledge about the world and emotional development.
They get handed a lot of toys and tools to get paid the time their parents haven't spend with them, but can't make up for the deep nothing they perceive.
Sold out worlds, they long for destruction, for the destination that remains for when there's no task for you or your body is plagued by diseases. Diseases the parents thought about in their selfishness "they will be able to get along with that". And they keep wondering why these kids in their selfishness for exstasy beget another aimless generation of kids accidently...
On the other hand, education in the form of learning in excess for those who can pay for it. Planning of futures until the age of 40, orchestrated and without a doubt that anything can come in between this. No guess of what poverty means, what deprivations means, not even that it exists at all or what life-threatening circumstances could be. A bubble which nothing goes wrong within.
In the end, the planning also reveals its shallowness: Getting education, getting jobs, founding families, reproduce, buying houses, buying cars - running around and following the established role model, without a thought for a deeper meaning, just as trying to get drunk and loitering around in derelict houses and on the streets. It's about running away and clouding your mind.
The middle class youngsters ignore in their planning, that their kids are going to have to fight even harder for getting jobs as there is limitation in this, so it is also done in a manner of feeding your ego, numbing your mind to prevent to understand something.
Whereas the kids which grow up in poverty rather get their kids unvoluntarily and suddenly start to get those dreams of a idyllic world that isn't reachable for them. If they do not turn out in the end to abandon them, to show them the true face of what their existence already is: Superfluous.
First love, first drink, maybe even first time getting physical. And lots of friends.
What has modern society to offer to its youngsters?
Living in sterile, mold-contamined, pimped up flats, celebrating their weekends in used up buildings whose purpose they know at the highest from when they were kids, offered consumer goods which they can never pay, jobs that don't exist and promises that never come into effect. On top, bags of clothes manifactured in the third world which they can cut and rearrange to show how run-down they are, and ugly hair-cuts which make them appear like they have some sort of problems.
Education somewhat is an alien concept, both in the way of knowledge about the world and emotional development.
They get handed a lot of toys and tools to get paid the time their parents haven't spend with them, but can't make up for the deep nothing they perceive.
Sold out worlds, they long for destruction, for the destination that remains for when there's no task for you or your body is plagued by diseases. Diseases the parents thought about in their selfishness "they will be able to get along with that". And they keep wondering why these kids in their selfishness for exstasy beget another aimless generation of kids accidently...
On the other hand, education in the form of learning in excess for those who can pay for it. Planning of futures until the age of 40, orchestrated and without a doubt that anything can come in between this. No guess of what poverty means, what deprivations means, not even that it exists at all or what life-threatening circumstances could be. A bubble which nothing goes wrong within.
In the end, the planning also reveals its shallowness: Getting education, getting jobs, founding families, reproduce, buying houses, buying cars - running around and following the established role model, without a thought for a deeper meaning, just as trying to get drunk and loitering around in derelict houses and on the streets. It's about running away and clouding your mind.
The middle class youngsters ignore in their planning, that their kids are going to have to fight even harder for getting jobs as there is limitation in this, so it is also done in a manner of feeding your ego, numbing your mind to prevent to understand something.
Whereas the kids which grow up in poverty rather get their kids unvoluntarily and suddenly start to get those dreams of a idyllic world that isn't reachable for them. If they do not turn out in the end to abandon them, to show them the true face of what their existence already is: Superfluous.
(no subject)
Date: 18 July 2016 04:43 am (UTC)It can seem ridiculous, but if I was suddenly in charge of a high school of 3000 teenagers from low income areas, it is what i'd do too because it works. If you do the old school way and just warn, threaten, and punish students, they'd set fires and attack you and each other. In the past, teens at wealthy schools would behave because their parents would kill them if they didn't and teens at poor schools would just go to jail if they were awful.
I do think now that teens in wealthier neighborhoods still behave well in school because their parents would kill them, but in poor neighborhoods what I was writing about above happens. It is weird and like a propaganda community. Like I said though, it mostly works.
The best ones though use the rewards, but also have stern punishments at the same time like Saturday schools and a classroom full of like the 30 or so students that don't follow rules at all. In that classroom, there are like four adults and everything is watched very carefully.
Also, there are a series of different schools where teenagers that get kicked out go to.
(no subject)
Date: 18 July 2016 07:24 am (UTC)It really sounds like giving up.
Rewarding them and making things easier in the exams for them - that's a thing that I know -, adapting to them, it sounds like nothing more than "okay, we give up getting them to do anything because they fucking bomb and destroy us for attempting that".
And giving up means there actually are tensions in society with these kids, but society itself and all other entities which could help it don't do anything. And that's also due to having given up, there's no public funding for it.
I get upon this idea because I heard it a few times during a while how kids got pulled back onto the high road in the GDR if they really strayed from it. It has to do with something that is called "Jugendwerkhof" or so, but I really don't know what this term exactly means in practice.
But the general idea behind it I recognize from what is told about it: If kids go haywire, brawl, binge-drink, take harder drugs, steal, turn into thugs, destroy things, terrorize their surroundings - you need a conecept how to get these kids back onto that path which you want as a society. If you haven't, and if you don't make your attempts that they can't avoid to deal with, then they won't be any better as adults. You won't ever get to get it out of them again.
And this is just not based upon adapting to their desires, but to put them in an environment with solid and consequent rules, where they get a solid feeling about what they can do and what not, and as long as they play by these rules they can acquire their pound of flesh.
This would need to be done these days too, but public households are broke everywhere and private investors would only turn this into a profit business and not into a moral business.
The schools can't fix this behavior either because first they're dependent on public funding too, and second, it's a task in that way which they can't perform. It's too much for their spectrum of competences. The only kind of schools which maybe could do this are boarding schools as the students live there too and it's their daily surroundings.
(no subject)
Date: 19 July 2016 01:13 am (UTC)Maybe it is mostly just where I am, in Southern California. At the schools I'm talking about, the students really do need to be encouraged to try to do well in school at all. A lot of the students, from low income and minority homes, would just quit and stop coming.
Here there are junior colleges too. In Southern California there are like fifty or more of them! It is like junior colleges have become an extra two years of high school and high schools, which is where teenagers go, is now like preparation for junior college which is now like trade school. In the high schools now, teachers are trying to get students to learn to come to class, take tests, get assignments in on time, get along with others in classes, etc...
It is sad that it used to be much better than this and people should try to make it better. I think though that since the 1960s and 1970s or something the school system is suddenly responsible for all girls, all African Americans, all illegal immigrants from Mexico, all native born Mexican kids, etc... So, the schools are responsible for having all these people come to school, even homeless children- I think in the United States there are like a million homeless children, so it is something to just get almost all of them to understand what school is and how it works by the time high school ends.
There's a weeding out process too where maybe the worst two percent or something end up jail or keep getting separated from the regular student population by being expelled and going to worse and worse schools.
It is like when someone is 20 years old now, it is like they are what someone was like when they were 16 before. So, high school is like extended grammar school and junior college is like what high school used to be.
This all sucks for the top 10% of high schools like this though. I can see where they'd feel like it was mostly dumbed down, but actually surprisingly it seems like kids in like calculus and physics classes seem to like the new way these schools work. They love all the rewards and stuff.
I'm sure schools were much better in previous generations, but what are you going to do?
I will say the good side of the whole thing though is that I bet in previous generations there were a lot of teachers that were unscrutinized and were not really doing much and there is so much scrutiny now that this doesn't happen nearly as much anymore. Like, you can see all the young teachers getting arrested for sex with students. That is something good coming from the way it is now. It is really heavily analyzed and scrutinized and shit like that is caught almost right away.
(no subject)
Date: 19 July 2016 06:20 am (UTC)People must get sick of their money being carried out of their state and their communities by themselves that offers their children such bad public education. I can't do that for them.