Fehlgeleitet

[matrixmann]

Nenne es ein ungeheures Kommunikationsproblem, wenn man selbst Leuten Rassismus unterstellt, die einem nicht dumm kommen.

Call it an incredible problem of communication if one even accuses people of racism which don't get smart with you regularly.

Comments

[matrixmann]

Not acutely, but things like this tend to happen again here or there.

You know, at least it proves to me like, if somebody reads my stuff at all, does some research in my materials "how is that supposed to be understood?" (like I sometimes do, if something bothers me), he doesn't get a damn thing what I mean, he just wants to see what he wants to see.
But I rather guess nobody of those which come around the corner with accusations read a single drop of lines that I have left behind.
'Cause, if someone did, he would come to the question "If somebody complains about others throwing him in a pot with the obvious morons and Nazis, why would he do that? Would he do that if he could identify with that stuff?"
About language skills I don't know as a good bunch of my stuff is written in English, but during these days I wouldn't put a strong guess on this as English has become such a common language.

I maybe don't know if people become turned off from my blog too if they read a comment of mine and it contains statements they don't like.
But even then on the other hand I must say - if you once agree with me and then not, actually you must see or at least maybe become curious for one time to verify your image that you have about me. And verification for a cliché I don't have to offer.

Maybe that also confuses others... On another hand again, I would say then "just revise all your fucking patterns, think about all things being self-evidently to you and see how much of that is close to reality - aren't you maybe caught up in stereotyped thinking too?".
It seems like this is the point then which people refuse to do.
And you know what? This is like a steadily reoccurring déjà vu to me.

[onb2017.livejournal.com]

I actually see it happening all the time. People don't read your reasoning they just see the heading and they start saying something that is some stereotype. I would ask them to point out a particular sentence in your post and explain what is wrong with it. Because they don't base their judgement on your text, they usually disappear because they have nothing to say. Sometimes for people like that just the name of the topic is like a red rag for a bull but they don't bother to look further.

[matrixmann]

How would you know that?
Saying, I'm the last one anyone ever talks to if anything bothers him in my writings.

[onb2017.livejournal.com]

How do they blame you of something then?

[matrixmann]

I barely get any comment in content about what I write in my own texts, I rather get resonances accusing me of something on my comments that I write in other peoples' blogs. So there is no headline to feel disturbed by; as well as I don't imagine that you know places where I drop in.

[onb2017.livejournal.com]

O, I see, then they see key words, trust me. That has happened to me. I know it makes you feel frustrated, like, dude, did you read what I wrote?

[matrixmann]

Then it must be like key phrases rather in my case...

Saying, I know enough about communication only in written form that you don't have the given information which somebody puts his emphasis on in a sentence of context. But that for, I use the html-terms for marking something as cursive or fat (depending on what a blog allows or executes correctly), I know them in my head, it's no big deal.
With that marks in layout that are possible in writing, I sometimes think like "Did you even notice where I put the emphasis on?". You know, I don't do this for nothing or because so I'm bored. To me it seems like people don't notice, for real.
Or, I don't know, if they think I do this for "alibi reasons", to pull my head out of the sling for the public that I don't have anything bad in mind while I actually have (in their imagination).

See, I have this in mind and try to keep that in the back of my head while writing anything to secure myself against gross misunderstandings - and even though I rather mostly get confronted with peoples' associations to a word, even though I try to be exact and general in my picking of words.

[onb2017.livejournal.com]

Key phrase still do not covey meaning so might be. Like you said, you need a context and intonation. I mean bold or italicized work good providing people pay attention but they don't they have preconceived notions and sometimes it is like talking to a wall.

[matrixmann]

Yep, that's the way I get to feel it.
And even try to talk against that - make clear "people, you flood this conversation and me with something from your own head, not what it says here!", it's like you said something even more evil than what you started with. Like "How dare you to have doubts towards my perspective! My perspective is overly right!"
Saying, it's not like I'm not used to always have the wrong opinion compared to current zeitgeist, but anytime it's getting tiring. The game is getting old and taking on dust.