Wartime

The only thing one should be ashamed of is if you committed big or stupid shit, not for who you are, what you’re made of, what your body is like or what your stances are on various issues if you can reason them in a sophisticated manner.

Actually, the charge of the Capitol is just the tip of the ice berg of a development that's been going on for longer in the United States.
It's an event displaying the deep split within the US society and its political system, as well it's an expression of two very sharply opposing forces which both firmly believe to have found the Holy Grail and be on a mission from the Lord itself, while they're just both streams trying to force their understanding of how the world works upon the rest of the society governed by them.

In other words, to the people lesser educated about the US: Intersectionality is just radical racism and sexism through the backdoor, it doesn't change anything, and violent anti-racist protests and arbitrary juristic accusations against whoever is in the wrong place at the wrong time aren't going to fix your country (neither they bake you a loaf of bread) - just like a drifting back to nostalgia, glorifying golden economic ages which are no more, displaying one's guns in public all the time, disregarding the rules what one's country is made of and governed by, believing in bullshit theories about getting younger and 150 years old through the blood of children, stepping on the lesser financially fortunate and steadily disputing over if the poor deserve to get any handouts like social benefits and a general health insurance (because they're supposedly "of no use to anyone") isn't going to make anything turn to the better.

Each side needs to take a step back from their replacement religion and recognize it for what it is: Something that only takes places in their heads. Imagination.
And then take a precise pragmatic look at what the problems are - facts, not faith.

(It isn't called "theory" for nothing... "Theory" means "explanation pattern lacking scientific proof for it".)

In the case of US society drifting apart and being shortly before fighting each other physically, all supporters of both fractions can take a good look at themselves, if they search someone to blame.
It's your fault altogether!

Just so you heard it for once...

(This is a text trying to draw back attention to something which has totally dropped into oblivion during all the modern discourse about “gender”, but which once had and still has its legitimation in the spectrum of sex.
It should be also taken as a reminder why slight non-conforming mustn’t be taken as an indicator to being “trans” and having to undergo the way of changing one’s physical appearance in order to get happy again and become able to manage one’s life.)

---

Addition to this one here: https://matrixmann.dreamwidth.org/262809.html


Since the adoption of John Money’s definition of “gender”, and by that the misconception of mental sex being something that one gets nurtured into, the science about human sex has very much shifted from recognizing different degrees and motivations for sex non-conforming to focusing on transsexuals - people who can’t live with their nature-given physics because their mental sex is psychically wired opposed to that.
This you can even legitimately call “transgender ideology” or “transgender industry” - because, whenever an individual shows behavior and thinking patterns non-conforming with the established figures for “what a man is like” and “what a woman is like” in its respective culture, it doesn’t show accepting of that in the context frame of the person’s original physical and mental sex; it very quickly gets to telling people “you’re “trans””, even if the person in question never even heard of that word before or never considered itself to be “trans”.
In other words: That’s the more formal and more differentiated wording for the modern phenomenon when people appear to “get pressured” into adopting a trans identity and when they undergo reassignment, they find they don’t get happier with their lives.

What happened there exactly is that: Someone who isn’t actually “trans” got pressured (by whatever entities) to feel so because those entities wouldn’t accept him/her in in his/her sex identity, they’d negate it to that individual out of a similarly narrow-minded view about sex which they hold as a reproach against conservatives.
Like “there can’t be a non-alpha-male or even sissy version of a man; if he is, then he’s actually a female” or “there can’t be a butch version of a woman; if she is one, then she’s actually a man”.
Doesn’t that structure of the world sound a little familiar?
Right, many people with a non-average character may know such things as insults from the school yard.
That’s actually also how primitive this way of thinking is.

“Trans” people rather took these “insults”, if they got to hear it back then, as a compliment, and get insane from a modern society that tolerates and even accepts everything, without ever drawing a line where femininity and masculinity begin, always denying them the recognition “okay, here is where one of the two ends, I get it that you’re positioned on the other side of the spectrum”.

But people who instinctively aren’t “trans” or who are still insecure about themselves, about their own personality, for those this way of talking becomes toxic - because they get influenced, talked into and perhaps even pushed into thinking patterns and patterns to feel which they actually originally don’t have. This sends them on an odyssey which is damned to lead them to no additional happiness.

The core point that could help here is remembering that old term called “transvestism”, which hadn’t been coined just for nothing.
“Transvestism” means all people who like to dress and behave like the opposite sex (fully or in parts), but without wanting to modify their body via drastic measures such as surgeries or hormones or feeling instinctively dysphoric about it.
This also includes all people who adopt “parts” in general from the “world” of the opposite sex - like specific pieces of clothes, specific items that one sex tends to use more often than the other, fields of personal interest - and integrate them into their lives without that causing them to feel unwell in their born sex (physically and mentally).
A specific term that was once introduced here in the scientific field was “cross-dressing”, but that just covers only a small field of the entirety. (Especially the forms of cross-dressing that only apply to females, for the most part, don’t get regarded this way anymore these days due to differing cultures having accepted the view of a woman dressed in something else than a dress or skirt - without negating her sex because of that.)

( Read more... )

A myth that gets spread inside the West at least since Hollywood acquired a decisive international position and since people look up to whatever comes from its dream factory: The myth of the “only one”.
There’s one person out there in this world to be “yours”, to love you, to serve you, to fulfill your wishes, to aim for the same goal like you, to sail through good seas and difficult seas with you not leaving your side, and which will stay with you for the rest of your life, no matter what happens...

As reality started to change, as human life in the Western world became faster and people became more and more focused on consuming, as well as became more and more very individual, changing as personalities a couple of times throughout life, a small deduction from this ideal was made in terms of changing that dream to a “cohabitant”, which just stays for an undefined amount of years by your side, but very probably not for the rest of your whole life. - The slash in the timeline that they call “when people began to divorce more often”.
As well as when same-sex relationships became publicly tolerated and not prosecuted anymore.

But one basic principle throughout all these changes in human relationships remained the same: There’s just one person out there to love you and to be with, not two, three or more.
Just ONE.
One person to be intimate with, one person to be the most deeply emotional with, one person to lie in bed and sleep with. Anything else is associated with “dirt”, with being a slut and dragging shame onto one’s name. Leading relationships with more than one person at the same time also easily gets associated with “you do it with everyone who isn’t quick enough to run away from you”, implying an increased sexual neediness, which is, again, associated with different sorts of judgment over the specific person and its character, such as human poorness, a lack of taking care of oneself, lacking personal pride and self-respect, and disloyalty.

Although meanwhile there are means to prevent diseases from spreading through uncontrolled and carelessly having sex with everyone, and means to prevent a woman from possibly getting a child each time she sleeps with a man (as long as she doesn’t make use of a sex technique that prevents semen from entering her vagina), still this dogma from old times keeps being present. It gets used in marketing and in cultural standards - and at least since more Muslims live in the Western world too and bring their custom along with them that up to 4 wives are allowed within the framework of their religion, the refusal and the non-understanding towards relationships between more than two people of a whatever kind of sexual sort increased by a chunk again because it gets considered “alien” to human nature and “inhuman” in emotional terms - for whatever reason - to live one’s life like this.

But, boiled down to the heart of it - what objectivity lies behind all this?
What non-cultural, non-emotional, non-religious reason is there to keep enforcing that illusion, like it is a God-given truth?
Is there actually any at all?

All that what people link with other than a 2-person-relationship are associations that are being shoveled at them and taught to them ever since they were children. Associations that originate in Jewish/Christian religion, that originate in justified fears of earlier centuries and lack of means to put a stop to them effectively, which have been reformed and reshaped over the centuries into more modern forms as religion became lesser and lesser important for a person’s life; even as inventions like condoms and other contraceptives were made and common people allowed to use them.
The only factor that there maybe remains left with some sort of justification, to not let “everyone doing it with everyone higgledy-piggledy” come true is to not produce too many half-siblings which don’t know about each other being such - because incest of whatever kind and genetic sameness proves to be bad for for procreation and leads to increased amounts of birth defects and hereditary diseases.

But - is founding a family and continuing one’s family bloodline the main reason why people come together and form other than platonic relationships?
Or is “family” still just defined by adults procreating children? Haven’t there other forms already come together that generate a similar emotional environment?
Also, through people divorcing way more often throughout their lives, or not marrying at all and getting children even though, isn’t there an increased amount of half-siblings present in a single family through the “patchwork”-model anyway?

So, what reason is it based on to keep this dogma still around and people faithfully believing in it?

One big reason is marketing - because marketing can sell a ton of crap to people then, if they keep looking for that “only one” partner to complete their lives.
People need gadgets, utensils and human services to get pretty to court for each other (e. g. pretty, eye-catching or certain specific clothes, makeup, perfume, hairdressing, manicure, body shaving, coaches for flirting), people need spaces to potentially meet other people in which they will date later (e. g. online dating services, dating agencies, partially also bars and clubs, restaurants for having the date too), people need expensive things to impress other people (e. g. jewelry, expensive cars, a good dress), also they need high-earning jobs in order to leave behind the impression of economic security.

If you keep up that illusion of “there’s one person among millions out there which is destined to end up with you and stay with you forever”, there’s a ton of advantages for this reigning economic system called “capitalism”.
People are going to try to their best to invest in superficial commercial things, people are going to bring in their workforce to earn high status and a big salary - they’re going to aim and stretch for things they can’t reach, but along the way someone else can make a profit from those efforts.
Also, if people just aim for one person, and their heads are filled with illusions about perfection, they’re straight destined to get disappointed by the reality and quickly invest into courting for someone new again. - Which generates new profit for those people whose enterprises sell them the necessary means to enter the new hunt.

If people got down to reducing their expectations, and maybe sometimes accepting that, what they sought to find in just one person alone, to meet it in a couple of people, then this excessive courting would lose a significant reason for it to exist. People perhaps were way more relaxed, didn’t invest these tons of money (they sometimes don’t even have) into crap that’s not gonna secure them the fulfillment they pursue, and they became less judgmental of each other which maybe brings some relationships apart in the first place. Think of excessive jealousy, think of the countless personal definitions what makes out and counts as “cheating”, think of taking possession of a partner’s very life - think of that whole game of either turning or getting turned into a person that you’re not just in order to keep up each other’s expectations towards a relationship.

Investing one’s every power and material in one person is comparable to try to stake everything on one card - very high risk, very much the scenario of possibly losing everything (although you didn’t need to lose it all) and burning one’s hands along with it.
Of course, this provides a situation for adrenaline junkies and for people who are in desperate need of their ego being caressed - because getting the one and winning is very tempting, as it is just that unlikely -, but, realistically speaking, there needs to happen serious contemplation if it is worth accepting that risk every time. All the while as there are many other people out there too and someone can easily quit a relationship if anything about it doesn’t suit for them.
It isn’t the same situation anymore as the potential amount of available partners wasn’t that large because human communities lived farther apart, moving one’s location to a completely different area wasn’t that easy and single individuals didn’t have the modern means to communicate over large distances. So that you were often forced to get along with what you have available locally.

Another factor is: Why do emotional and physical needs always have to be covered in unity?
Who defined that? Who wrote the decree that this has to be the case?
Isn’t the spectrum of possible relationships between humans richer than just that one specific form as the highest form of intimacy, and no other can ever make it to a comparable quality?
Even human psyche is very colorful, can develop into many directions that socially may be considered as “bizarre” - and still there is nearly always a way or at least an ambition to establish tolerance for it.
So, why not also for the idea that you can have several intimate relationships that also include physical aspects?
In the end, some humans have them anyway without anybody of the people involved even knowing about each other (e. g. “ghetto customs of intimate relationships”)... And without spending their life with accepting moral shame.

A smugly pharisaic cult that calls itself “progressive”, but which doesn’t have anything to do with the traditional left, and which even highly contradicts itself, so that it neither makes sense, nor does it firmly tell what it wants the world to turn into, goes viral during those years, trying to take over the public discourse and police everybody’s thoughts, everybody’s words, fill everybody’s sane feeling of “doing nothing wrong” arbitrarily with fear and shame of possibly doing the wrong with their every move (and that being the fault of their lives). It researches internet histories for just the smallest in violations of a mindset/ideology which barely anyone outside of its circles understands and supports.
They do that in order to be able to appeal to the mob to “hang the perpetrator higher”, much less like leftists, but more like just ordinary egomaniacs whose world circulates entirely around themselves and which can’t let anybody live anything else that they don’t understand or approve.
Meanwhile, even former allies don’t seem safe from that self-righteous method, once they take a single stance which the “cult” mob disapproves. Everything that they don’t agree with becomes a fatal lashing out against everyone to ruin their lives because they deem it “legitimate” to do so.

This... isn’t leftist. It’s the classic strategy from the right to ban everything they don’t approve. To cleanse the world from material, ideas and thought which they arbitrarily deem “a sin” out of whatever conservative or religious mindset. Or out of fear from anything which can become dangerous to their power inside the political system.
This isn’t even progressive ‘cause it downright paralyzes progress. You can see it its effects: People shut their mouths or censor their own speech in advance in order to not become victim of the all-destroying lash that outlaws you and calls for making your life miserable as long as you live (calling straight down for your suicide would be illegal), necessary debates disappear from the screen, unpopular as well as factually wrong or controversial stances move to the underground and develop themselves further in the darkness where barely anyone gets to know how their stories continue, people shy away from making public speeches or actually enter practicing an activity in the public and the public culture turns into a one-sided mash of monoculture which doesn’t reflect peoples’ everyday life nor the reality overall.

That is the very nature of what one knows from dogmatic theocracies as well as totalitarian dictatorships - only this time, there’s a different bunch of people sitting in the seats who command it. Not old white heterosexual men, but old and young, heterosexual as well as homo- and bisexual, binary and nonbinary, gender-reaffirmed as well as cis, black, brown and white men, women and neutrois. Who, instead of working with the gun and the threat of physical execution, work with brutal shaming and outlawing, leaving it either to the victim itself to beat itself up over its “misbehavior” or to someone unassociated and anonymous who wants to to carry out the dirty work, letting it appear like an accident, an overshoot or something else which they can’t be held responsible for because that “was an individual’s decision we disassociate from”.

Einige Wochen nun schon wohnt man dem Treiben um Corona als Zaungast bei - und mittlerweile weiß man nicht, wessen Verhalten und Denken man schlimmer wiegen soll: Das der Regierung, die nur die Wiedereröffnung ihrer Wirtschaft im Kopf hat, die sich mit dem Maskenball und einer eventuellen Corona-App das nicht in Stein gemeißelte Szenario per Placebo schönredet - oder das der Bürger, die sich in ihrer Bewegungsfreiheit so gekränkt fühlen, dass sie dafür während einer noch nicht abgeschlossenen Pandemie auf die Straße gehen (wobei ein Teil von ihnen auf alle Vorsichtsmaßnahmen scheißt und die Schuld auf andere schiebt, die sich angeblich einhellig gegen die übrige Welt verschworen haben).

International gewinnt man dazu die Beobachtung, dass seltsamerweise solches Treiben nur möglich ist in Ländern, in denen a) die allgemeine Verdummung (hinsichtlich der Allgemeinbildung) der Bürger ziemlich fortgeschritten ist, b) Social Media leicht erreichbar sind und/oder c) einfach die größten Auswirkungen magischerweise aus irgendwelchen Gründen bisher an ihnen vorübergezogen sind.
Die lautesten Skeptiker nennen dies: „Na, wo sind denn nun die versprochenen Leichenberge?!“
(Geschmacklos hoch drei, nicht?)
„Sehen ist glauben“ - diese simplizistische Art der Erkenntnisgewinnung - gewinnt wieder mehr Anhänger (um diesen Prozess auf etwas einfachere Art zu verdeutlichen).

In all dem Treiben kann man sich des Eindruckes nicht verwehren, als wenn es einigen in der Welt noch zu gut geht. Erzählt jemandem in den USA, der durch die Pandemie seinen Job verloren hat und jetzt zusehen muss, wo er Geld herbekommt, um seine Miete weiter zu zahlen, und sich was zu essen kaufen zu können, mal die Verschwörungstheorien um Bill Gates, dass er an der halben (oder der ganzen) Welt einen Chemiecocktail ausprobieren will, der sich „Impfstoff“ nennt“, ihnen Mikrochips unter die Haut implantieren will und die WHO mit seinen nicht mal 10% Anteil, die er durch Spenden daran erkauft, in jedem einzelnen Schritt kontrolliert.
Der wird einem für einen Moment zuhören, euch dann den Scheibenwischer zeigen und sich danach wieder seinen ganz realen Sorgen widmen - die, ob die Verschwörung wahr ist oder nicht, nicht verschwinden werden.
Erzählt diesem Bürger auch etwas davon, dass durch die Maskenpflicht, durch noch nicht einmal fertig gestellte Tracing-Apps (von denen niemand weiß, ob und wann die überhaupt kommen und ob die wirklich funktionieren werden), durch Beschränkungen der Reisefreiheit, der Redefreiheit (über diese Theorien!) und der Versammlungsfreiheit seine über alles wichtigen demokratischen Rechte außer Kraft gesetzt werden und er mordsmäßig unterdrückt wird - so sehr, darüber werden Hunger, Durst und tatsächliche als auch drohende Obdachlosigkeit vergessen.

...Merkt ihr wie abstrus es ab hier wird?
Das ganze Gerede von „Unterdrückung“, das allen ernstes auch immer wieder mit den Zwanzigern des letzten Jahrhunderts verglichen wird (ja klar, wir laufen alle schon mit Wäschekörben voll Geldscheinen in die Läden, um nur ein Butterbrot zu kaufen, und auf der Straße werden schon wieder alle linken oder andere ernsthaft systemkritische Kräfte offen halbtot geprügelt, erschossen oder verschleppt und eingesperrt und niemanden kümmert es...) - im Vergleich zu dem, was andererorts in der Welt los ist, wo es noch nicht einmal Kurzarbeitergeld gibt, wirkt es, als wenn sich ein paar überkandidelte Adlige in ihrem Schloss darüber Gedanken machen, ob sie heute mal Kuchen statt Brot essen sollten.
Es geht ziemlich an der Lebensrealität derjenigen vorbei, die es am härtesten trifft.
Wen kümmern nämlich seine angeblichen Bürgerrechte noch, wenn er am Verhungern ist? Kann man die Freiheit essen? Wärmt die einem den Arsch? Stellt die einem ein Bett? Kann man von Reise- und Quasselfreiheit seine Kinder ernähren?

Vergegenwärtigt euch mal, in welcher Luxussituation man hier in Deutschland noch lebt (es ist zwar schwer, das so zu bezeichnen, weil es könnte definitiv noch wesentlich besser laufen, aber im internationalen Vergleich ist es glatt so).
Zu Beginn des ganzen Treibens konnte sich diese bis aufs Blut zerstrittene und stetig herumeiernde Regierung, die dauernd von ihren Personalien besessen ist, wenigstens auf einige (!) soziale Abfederungen verständigen - Entscheidungen, für die sonst im Bundestag Wochen und Monate ins Land gehen, ohne je auch nur zu einem Ergebnis zu kommen.
Es hätte auch völlig anders laufen können.
Kabinett Merkel IV hätte auch wie Trump die Hände komplett in den Schoß (und eine Raute) falten können und dann erginge es einem Großteil des arbeitenden Bevölkerung wie den Kleinunternehmern hierzulande - genau so wie es in den USA bisher lief.
Warum haben sie das nicht gemacht?
Weil selbst die Dummbatzen, die im jetzigen Kabinett noch übrig geblieben sind und sich nicht vorher verpisst haben, schnell kapierten, wenn sie die Wirtschaft schließen und alles sich selbst überlassen, dann gäbe es keine Klatschorgien für die Krankenpfleger und Kassierer, sondern diese Beschäftigen auf 450-Euro-Basis würden sich in Sicherheit bringen und die Aldi-Filiale dem Mob überlassen. - Und das in einer ganzheitlichen Situation, wo der Unmut über die Regierung und über die ewige Kanzlerin schon seit Jahren vor sich hin schwillt.

Man kann von diesen Figuren halten, was man will, aber in dieser Situation - mit dieser Planung unausweichlich vor ihnen liegend - fiel es sehr auf, dass man plötzlich auch mal handeln kann. Ohne lange Machtspiele der Parteien untereinander wie sonst üblich.

An und für sich sollte das vielmehr dafür sprechen wie sehr den sonstigen Schwätzern der Arsch auf Grundeis ging...
Man will sie nicht loben, aber in diesem Punkt muss man das glatt mal tun.
Aus dem einfachen Grunde: Es könnte noch schlimmer sein.

Und eben vor diesem Hintergrund erscheint es geradezu wie eine Orgie des Ego, wenn sich plötzlich Leute versammeln und sich allen ernstes darüber beschweren, wie sehr ihnen angeblich die Menschenwürde geraubt würde.
Die Menschenwürde geraubt - sagt mal, tickt ihr noch richtig?!
Habt ihr die letzten Wochen in einem Folterknast gesessen? Wurden Eletroschocks an euch durchgeführt? Wurden euch eine Vielzahl von Drogen und undefinierbaren Chemikalien eingeflößt? Wurden euch die Knochen gebrochen? Das Zeitgefühl geraubt? Wart ihr Lärmfolter ausgesetzt oder Waterboarding? Gab es jeden Tag Gruppenvergewaltigung? Seit ihr fast verhungert und verdurstet?
Euch wurde lediglich gesagt, ihr sollt zuhause bleiben, anderen Menschen nicht zu nahe kommen, die ihr nicht kennt, ihr konntet nicht von Hamburg nach München fahren, ihr durftet eure pflegebedürftigen Angehörigen oder Eltern nicht besuchen (die ihr eh nur ein Mal im Jahr zur Höflichkeit besucht), ihr durftet euch nicht nach Lust und Laune vergnügen und keine Massenveranstaltungen besuchen. Kritisch war daran höchstens, dass sich die Ärzte nun vor den potentiellen Patienten auch materiell verschanzt haben und nicht nur durch lang in der Ferne liegende Termine (hier: weil Schutzkleidung plötzlich Goldstaub wurde), laufende Behandlungen nicht oder nur stiefmütterlich weitergemacht wurden, neue Behandlungen anzufangen unmöglich war, wenn man nicht gerade mit dem Kopf unter dem Arm ankam.

Der Rest - was war daran „seiner Menschenwürde beraubt werden“?
Das Einzige, was sich erkennen lässt, ist ein Hang zur Überdramatisierung - Dramaqueen spielen. Sich wichtiger machen, als man ist.

Um es überspitzt auszudrücken: Werdet mal arm, Leute... Dann sind viele dieser Rechte auch eingeschränkt und der Großteil der Bevölkerung empfindet es auch noch als „gerecht“ und „das Normalste von der Welt“.
Oder werdet mal von verschiedenen Leuten in eurem Leben traumatisiert - da braucht es keine üble Regierung oder Weltverschwörung, um einen Käfig um euch herum zu bauen! Die Narben auf eurer Seele errichten das Gefängnis von ganz allein.
Wo sind da die Maulhelden, die mit „Gesicht zeigen“ (was nichts kostet und ein überschaubares Risiko in sich birgt) und dummen T-shirt-Sprüchen schwerwiegende Probleme lösen wollen?

Der lauteste Teil von diesem Treiben mutet dem Basisdenken von Mittelstandskindern an, deren größte Sorgen sein könnte, dass sie mal mit sich allein sein müssten und erkennen könnten, was für eine hohle und hässliche Frucht sie sind.
Glaubt einer ernsthaft, auf diesen Anti-Corona-Maßnahmen-Demos tauchen Leute auf, die schwer von diesen Entscheidungen beeinträchtigt wurden?
Wer wirklich schwer davon in seinem Treiben - insbesondere seinem Broterwerb - behindert wurde, der hat nicht das Geld, um in die nächste Großstadt zu fahren, sich mit Dutzenden oder sogar hunderten von fremden Leuten für nichts die Beine in den Bauch zu stehen und auf der Straße Kirmes zu feiern!
Das können sich nur diejenigen erlauben, die keinen nennenswerten Verlust damit machen!
Also diejenigen, die zuhause sitzen und versorgt sind, trotz aller Auswirkungen, die Corona mit sich gebracht hat, maximal noch die, die vor Ort wohnen. (Würden dort diejenigen auftauchen, die nichts mehr zu verlieren haben, würde die Sache nicht mehr friedlich bleiben, sondern sich jedes Mal in einen Hexenkessel verwandeln... Denn Hunger und das Gefühl von realer Bedrohung sind die Dinge, die böse machen.)

Um diesen Text mit etwas scharfem abzurunden:

Widerstand2020? Leute, erwacht endlich mal aus euren Tagträumereien und aus eurer Besessenheit von euch selbst! Merkt ihr eigentlich, auf welchem hohen Niveau hierzulande teilweise gejammert wird?
Abstrakte Dinge wie „Bürgerrechte“ - das klingt alles nett und schön im Ohr und keiner wird sich dagegen stellen... Da kann jeder plötzlich zum Helden werden, auch wenn er eigentlich nichts tut. So erfolgreich wurde noch nie ein Krieg geführt!
Letztlich aber, was bringen euch eure sogenannten „Rechte“ hier? Oder, besser ausgedrückt: Auf welche Weise wurden sie denn überhaupt bisher missachtet?
DAS nennt ihr schon „Verletzung der Menschenrechte“?!
In der Mehrheit der Bundesländer gab es noch nicht einmal eine Verfügung, dass man das Haus nur mit Passierschein A38 verlassen durfte! (Und selbst die des Saarlandes wurde gerichtlich kassiert, wurde für illegitim befunden.)
Wenn dieses Bisschen schon eine angebliche Verletzung eurer Rechte sein soll, auf einer Stufe mit Massenmord, Folter und Dichthalten über gröbste Umweltverschmutzung, die fast jeden Tag zahlreiches Leben (tierisch, menschlich und pflanzlich!) auslöscht, dann offenbart das wie tief ihr in der Suppe der Fressgier eures eigenen Egos steckt!
Wenn es um die realen Probleme geht, die aus Corona erwachsen, dagegen seid ihr mit eurem Geplärre über die hierzulande noch milden Beeinträchtigungen die reinsten Pausenclowns.
Welcher „Widerstand“? Der, der sich wie ein bockiges Kind auf den Boden wirft und schreit, wenn er seine grenzenlose Welt nicht mehr hat?

Wenn jemand euch ernsthaft was implantieren oder vergiften wollte, dann käme es nicht mehr so weit, dass ihr dagegen noch auf die Straße gehen könnt, sondern ihr würdet gleich an der Haustür abgefangen, weggebracht und das Objekt der Begierde euch unter Zwang verabreicht, ohne langes Herumzetern.
Nach wenigen Wochen wären alle Menschen durchexerziert.

Hier soll eine Weltverschwörung mit dem Kern „Bill Gates“ laufen?
Ha, sein Unternehmen hat die Smartphones verschlafen, dann ein halbgares Betriebssystem entwickelt, was weder Fisch noch Fleisch war, und selbst die etablierten Kunden vor Unnutzbarkeit noch verschreckt hat, und danach ein Betriebssystem entwickelt, welches „Stasi per Nutzerlizenz“ ist und den Kunden neuerdings vordiktiert, wann Systemupdates installiert werden!
Seit mehr als 10 Jahren haben sie kein Produkt mehr zustande bekommen, was die Nutzer gern angenommen haben!!
So jemand soll eine Weltverschwörung im Alleingang herbeiführen und akribisch und fehlerlos leiten können?
Das ist in etwa so realistisch wie Schweine im Weltall. Als wenn man dem Lehrling einen ganzen Betrieb anvertrauen würde und erwartet, dass die Buchführung sauber wie bei einem Profi mit 20 Jahren Geschäftserfahrung läuft!

Vor allen Dingen - diese Weltverschwörung würde dann auch noch gegen den Willen der anderen Superreichen laufen! Eine Ansammlung von Leuten, die sich in etwa so grün sind wie eine zerstrittene Familie...
Was meint ihr, warum international an allen Ecken in den Medien geheult wird, das die Wirtschaft möglichst schnell wiedereröffnet werden soll? Warum hat Adidas seinen Kredit gekriegt, warum haben Ladenketten den allgemeinen Mietaufschub ausgenutzt und wird schon wieder über Prämien des Staates beim Autokauf debattiert? Warum will man um Himmels Willen die Bundesliga wieder zum Laufen kriegen? Häh? Etwa, weil die so froh über den Shutdown waren? Nein! Weil kein neues Geld mehr ‘reinkommt!
Die großen Unternehmer fühlten sich durch sämtliche Corona-Maßnahmen gestört; am liebsten hätten sie so weiter gemacht wie immer!

Glaubt ihr ernsthaft, gegen ein solches Rudel voller Missmütigen könnte ein einzelner Milliardär aus der hinteren Reihe ankommen (sei man doch mal ehrlich: Gates ist für die Welt nicht mehr so wichtig wie zu 2000; um Jeff Bezos von Amazon müsste man sich in dem Punkt mehr Sorgen machen), der auch noch nicht einmal so gut verwurzelt in diesen Kreisen ist und dazu noch mit einer Reihe Fehlschlägen in den letzten 10 Jahren „glänzt“?
Selbst mal angenommen es wäre so - man könnte sich allerdings rasch wieder beruhigt schlafen legen, weil diese Weltverschwörung höchst wahrscheinlich im Sande verlaufen wird. Gutes Handwerk sieht anders aus und hat inzwischen ganz andere Namen. Wir reden hier schließlich nicht von Warren Buffet, der auch jetzt noch weiß wie man das Geld sicher vermehrt!

Also, schert euch nach Hause!
Bekämpft die Ohnmacht mit etwas anderem als solchen Räuberpistolen!
Wenn hier einer Hysterie um Corona betreibt, sind das inzwischen nicht mehr nur Mainstream-Medien.

(Anbei: Es liegt in der Natur des Menschen, sich in Situationen der Ohnmacht und der Unfähigkeit, sein eigenes Schicksal zum Besseren beeinflussen zu können, etwas daherzureden, was diese verschwinden lässt oder wenigstens plausibel erscheinen lässt. Ohnmacht ist ein zerstörerisches Gefühl, welches menschliche Psyche nur sehr schwer aushalten kann. Es führt zu starken Selbstzweifeln und zur Zersetzung des Selbst - weil der eigentliche Weg der Dinge sein sollte, dass eigene Handlungen etwas bewirken sollen. Ein Zweig sollte brechen, wenn man genügend Kraft auf ihn ausübt. Reaktion zur Aktion ist wichtig für das Überleben.
Wenn diese ausbleibt, hat der Mensch eine Informationslücke, die er nicht selbst schließen kann - und daher macht sie ihn wahnsinnig. Weil er nicht dementsprechend handeln kann. Er hat nichts auf der Hand, woran er sich orientieren kann.
Darum muss Ohnmacht vermieden werden. Ohnmacht bedeutet „Stillstand“ - und „Stillstand“ bedeutet auf die Dauer den Tod. Ausgesetztsein, Entblößtsein - auf dem Silbertablett präsentiert für Fressfeinde.)

A trans-kid doesn’t think in terms like “trans” and whatever the adult world offers to describe this situation.
It just tries to be who it wants to be, copies the kind of behaviors it identifies with - and meanwhile that, it encounters that its surroundings signalize it that there’s a discrepancy between the expectations towards it and its actual thinking and acting patterns.

(Translation for ignorants, radical feminists and radical gender activists: A trans-kid feels itself as either male or female, only it has the problem that the body doesn’t match with that inner identity. It neither thinks in how right or wrong, sexist and stereotypical it is what it does or believes in, nor does it search hard for a justification of its genitals in accordance with its mental gender. It knows which sex carries which usually, but just decides for itself that it’s not what matters the most to define an image of oneself. Because of that, it also prefers to not make a big deal out of it.)

The recent obsession with “getting women into high representative offices” - tell you what it’s motivated by behind all this esoteric mumbo jumbo that they want to make believe.
On one hand, it’s enforcing a result what the reigning worldwide system (capitalism) didn’t deliver through the ways it’s designed until today - while there is a social demand for exactly that.
Instead of changing, which would make capitalism be no capitalism anymore, not in the way that the people which previously benefited the most from it continue to do so, they rather set up the plan to suggest the illusion of “okay, we gonna give this to you through enforcement with the crowbar” to get this demand superficially satisfied. “Superficially” because it’s a simple pattern of reigning through dogmatic decrees and entitling by favoring of mere physical features, instead of the previous pattern “sort out the most able for a job” (which is how capitalism, as well as any other system, stays capable to keep up itself). It’s not a realistic merit achieved by personal skills of character, it’s just an “accomplishment” like through a big famous name, connections or crawling up someone’s ass. Knowing who to give a blowjob to do a favor in order to get promoted.
On the other hand, it may be a tactic to activate a potential reserve of skilled workers which they’ve stopped investing a single penny in in the Western countries for several decades - now that they can already see the end of the brain drain from countries that still kept investing in the school education of its people because there are no skilled workers anymore in these, ready and willing to leave. They’ve already lured them all over to their side.
In other terms: If they still want some skilled workers to do the jobs, they’ve got to spend money again on some to actually become able to do so. The big pool they’ve stemmed from in the previous decades of alleged economic boom, it’s empty. Those people which can still come over, they aren’t the types of workers they look for in the Western world and they won’t ever be.
So, what to do? They rediscover their contingent of home-born women which they always tried to keep out of the job cycle because of conservative moral thinking.
But there is a twist - who promised eternal wealth before and told its women “just stay home, rely on a husband”, you can’t just switch the strategy like moving a lever and they all will go for the new craze now. Rather they gonna ask “What the heck is going on?! Why shall I contribute a share now so that I can live the way I do?! Previously things worked without that too!” - and this would be a rational and justified question.
By the way, the women which shall now enter the high ranks, portions of them discover how much the wheelings and dealings of this reigning system is not what they imagine as meaning of life, not what they wish to function like. So there is to make the strong guess large portions of them won’t behave as desired in order to fulfill that purpose which the big plan had intended them for.

Well, the important players of capitalism, knowing that their plan is going to fail, they already grab one of their jokers in this - and this is some method they always do: Let the manipulation machine spin restlessly.
Not just igniting and keeping the fire of gender war burning - also appointing a few sorted women into high positions by command immediately and staging that as “proof” of how their system is able though to deliver what society demands. This is what will be the “female quota”.
If there will be the abled ones among them, or not rather those who only know how to climb up a ladder in a hierarchy and which are eager for a big paycheck for the least amount of work to do, well, judge yourself...

So, basically in brief: This zeitgeisty mumbo jumbo currently is not much else than a trial of capitalism as it is to save its own ass for another time and go on living for some few years more.
In-depth, it’s just one big show - nothing really changes.
And as soon as it can already afford it again, this system’s gonna kick those women in their asses - just like after WWI and II as they maintained the structures of their respective home countries and helped rebuilding them again.
“Thank you for the job nicely done, but now get the fuck back to the kitchen and bear us a baby, we don’t need your work effort anymore!” - that’s what it’ll end in anytime.
(Mind you: The same like men have experienced if they worked of their ass for a firm for 20 years and then get fired during the next big mass dismissal for the shareholders’ dividend.)

---

Resource: https://matrixmann.dreamwidth.org/53410.html

Well, what is one supposed to think about that?
Somehow you get the impression like another one of those useless actions humans do, thinking their sit-ins, their stopping to live, their praying and singing stupid songs may impress the Gods to have mercy on them - all while there actually should be to learn that this pilgrimaging to a certain place won't till their fields, won't build them cars or cell-phones or anything else of their dearly-enjoyed modern life that they take as so damn self-evident.
In other words: Boys and girls from schools in the (Western) civilization - if you really want to do anything to help easing the climate disaster, stop quitting school, better go and get quitting wanting a new smartphone for every Christmas or birthday. Better even stop using them completely.
Stop purchasing a new wardrobe just for optical reasons. Stop going vegan for hysteria or hipster reasons - the soy for your meat-replacement products comes from Brazil too, getting shipped over a big ocean.
You really think that using the "angry child wants to get its will and screamingly throws itself upon the floor"-tactics are going to get you anywhere?
Kids, just get real: It really takes to bend over backwards in order to stop the world from spinning for a single second.
And, judging from your ages, there really is to doubt if you actually still care about the subject you make a fuzz about now after a couple of years...

"Liberal" and "Open Society" once were fight terms in Cold War times, which practically meant "Nazis walking around freely and shaping society too".

The creation of these two terms and turning their meanings into something that people, without trace, feel connoted as "positive" until today, while what they practically meant was morally questionable, is like an absolute standard from a political propaganda handbook.
These days barely anyone would remember their original meanings and what they truly stood for in practical circumstances...

Take this into account the text time you describe yourself and your personal viewpoint with this.