In connection with 9/11 - did someone actually ever come up, throughout all the time since the assault had happened, with the question after asbestos relating to why so many of the helpers and aids of the first hour on the street became sick or died of cancer in the years after the incident?
As much as the Afghanistan war remained an apple of discord throughout the whole time of the 20 years the occupation of the Western troops lasted because of the shady reasons it was started with, it also simultaneously and silently became a train you couldn’t just jump off anymore and quit tomorrow.
Now with their departure, the tactical and political changes of the coming weeks and months will be a proof of that - and, at the same time, it will lay down the sad record of that the two biggest and strongest armies in modern history - the US army + its NATO associates and the Soviet Army - couldn’t rip out the root of exaggerated Islamic religion in this region and create a united country called “Afghanistan” that can claim its rank in the modern world order.
Be that that the religious extremism was just started and about to be strengthened (the Afghanistan war of the Soviet Union) or that it is a result of past foreign engagements gone wrong (the support of the US for the mujaheddin fighters in the 80s to make the Soviet Union fall; the support of the Syrian rebels, which were mostly if not entirely Islamic extremists as well, and by that helping creating the Islamic State, strengthening Islamic religious motivated terrorism and systematic violence on the whole and in the whole Middle East area) and that it outgrows one’s own powers and finances that one was originally willing to sacrifice for this endeavor (the Afghanistan war of the US and the NATO troops that were still deployed there).
It’s hard to guess how much the decay inside these big players make out a share in their respective defeat...
As a question to those two wars you can leave behind if how war itself is being led in these modern times hasn’t changed too much from the scheme of firm organized and equipped armies fighting each other on the battlefield, as it still was the case in WWII and its later offshoots around the world.
For this specific case, you can put on the record - as bitter, brutal and cynical it may sound: As long as the residents of this country who aren’t involved in religious extremism aren’t willing themselves to take a different path, to organize and do something to drive this out of their country, to rip this root of war and violence out in their society once and for all and harshly sanction it, as long as they rather flee abroad or to Europe, giving in to the order that a guerrilla army imposes on them - as long as that remains the case, this country won’t ever be peaceful and “free” again (whatever anyone wants to imagine under the term “free”).
That Afghanistan which even received a seat in the Intercosmos program and could see one of their citizens fly into space to the Mir station will be missing for a very, very long time now...
Now with their departure, the tactical and political changes of the coming weeks and months will be a proof of that - and, at the same time, it will lay down the sad record of that the two biggest and strongest armies in modern history - the US army + its NATO associates and the Soviet Army - couldn’t rip out the root of exaggerated Islamic religion in this region and create a united country called “Afghanistan” that can claim its rank in the modern world order.
Be that that the religious extremism was just started and about to be strengthened (the Afghanistan war of the Soviet Union) or that it is a result of past foreign engagements gone wrong (the support of the US for the mujaheddin fighters in the 80s to make the Soviet Union fall; the support of the Syrian rebels, which were mostly if not entirely Islamic extremists as well, and by that helping creating the Islamic State, strengthening Islamic religious motivated terrorism and systematic violence on the whole and in the whole Middle East area) and that it outgrows one’s own powers and finances that one was originally willing to sacrifice for this endeavor (the Afghanistan war of the US and the NATO troops that were still deployed there).
It’s hard to guess how much the decay inside these big players make out a share in their respective defeat...
As a question to those two wars you can leave behind if how war itself is being led in these modern times hasn’t changed too much from the scheme of firm organized and equipped armies fighting each other on the battlefield, as it still was the case in WWII and its later offshoots around the world.
For this specific case, you can put on the record - as bitter, brutal and cynical it may sound: As long as the residents of this country who aren’t involved in religious extremism aren’t willing themselves to take a different path, to organize and do something to drive this out of their country, to rip this root of war and violence out in their society once and for all and harshly sanction it, as long as they rather flee abroad or to Europe, giving in to the order that a guerrilla army imposes on them - as long as that remains the case, this country won’t ever be peaceful and “free” again (whatever anyone wants to imagine under the term “free”).
That Afghanistan which even received a seat in the Intercosmos program and could see one of their citizens fly into space to the Mir station will be missing for a very, very long time now...
Zu "geschlechtergerechte Sprache"
7 July 2021 12:30 amLeute, statt bescheuertem Binnen-I und Gendersternchen, die keiner aussprechen kann, kümmert euch doch wirklich mal um was, wo Sprache eine elementare Rolle spielt und wo bis heute nichts als Verletzung durch Unabsicht und unsensibel gestellte Fragen zustande kommt: Trichtert doch mal den Gynäkologen und Urologen ein, dass sie notwendige Fragen an ihre Patienten bezüglich Sexualität nicht wie ein Hackklotz stellen oder als wenn sie mit einem Stück Holz arbeiten.
Oder - noch prekärer! -, trichtert es doch überhaupt erst einmal jedem ein, dass, wenn sich eine Person vor ihm outet, dass sie dem anderen Geschlecht angehört als ihr Körper sagt, man dann gleich von Stunde 0 an die korrekten Pronomen für diese Person verwendet und nicht, dass diejenigen erst noch 100 Mal betteln müssen, weil es im Verstand des Gegenübers ein Akt an Denkakrobatik ist, eine gewohnte Bezeichnung zu ändern, auch wenn das Stück Fleisch, was vor einem sitzt, nicht nach dem Ebenbild des Geschlechts aussieht, welches diese Person nach ihrer eigenen Aussage angehört.
In diesem Punkt versagen Binnen-I, Gendersternchen und welche auch immer geartete „geschlechtssensible Sprache“ nämlich auf ganzer Linie. Viel Rauch um Nichts, und das Wichtigste - für Personen, die wirklich ein Problem haben -, erreicht es nicht einmal. Weil sich um lauter bizarren Käse gestritten und eine Sache bis zur Unkenntlichkeit aufgeblasen wird anstatt sich überhaupt erst einmal um die wesentlichen Dinge zu kümmern.
(Und selbst das ist relativ einfach verständlich zu machen, wenn man es nur auf einfache Art verständlich machen will: Stelle sich derjenige, der die falschen Pronomen verwendet, vor, dass er einfach jedes Mal im Leben mit „Made“ angesprochen wird. - Es hat wohl keiner wirklich gern, stetig als Made bezeichnet zu werden, weil das, dem Inhalt nach, klingt wie „abwertend, minderwertig, widerwärtig, ‘Bitte, geh’ mir vom Leib!’“, beleidigend und demütigend ist. Und noch nicht einmal einen Grund hat.
So ist das aber für eine Person, die sich geoutet hat, aber weiterhin ungeachtet als das Geschlecht behandelt wird, was sie nur anatomisch ist. Es ist nämlich, als hätte man tatsächlich nichts gesagt - oder wahlweise mit einer Wand geredet.)
Oder - noch prekärer! -, trichtert es doch überhaupt erst einmal jedem ein, dass, wenn sich eine Person vor ihm outet, dass sie dem anderen Geschlecht angehört als ihr Körper sagt, man dann gleich von Stunde 0 an die korrekten Pronomen für diese Person verwendet und nicht, dass diejenigen erst noch 100 Mal betteln müssen, weil es im Verstand des Gegenübers ein Akt an Denkakrobatik ist, eine gewohnte Bezeichnung zu ändern, auch wenn das Stück Fleisch, was vor einem sitzt, nicht nach dem Ebenbild des Geschlechts aussieht, welches diese Person nach ihrer eigenen Aussage angehört.
In diesem Punkt versagen Binnen-I, Gendersternchen und welche auch immer geartete „geschlechtssensible Sprache“ nämlich auf ganzer Linie. Viel Rauch um Nichts, und das Wichtigste - für Personen, die wirklich ein Problem haben -, erreicht es nicht einmal. Weil sich um lauter bizarren Käse gestritten und eine Sache bis zur Unkenntlichkeit aufgeblasen wird anstatt sich überhaupt erst einmal um die wesentlichen Dinge zu kümmern.
(Und selbst das ist relativ einfach verständlich zu machen, wenn man es nur auf einfache Art verständlich machen will: Stelle sich derjenige, der die falschen Pronomen verwendet, vor, dass er einfach jedes Mal im Leben mit „Made“ angesprochen wird. - Es hat wohl keiner wirklich gern, stetig als Made bezeichnet zu werden, weil das, dem Inhalt nach, klingt wie „abwertend, minderwertig, widerwärtig, ‘Bitte, geh’ mir vom Leib!’“, beleidigend und demütigend ist. Und noch nicht einmal einen Grund hat.
So ist das aber für eine Person, die sich geoutet hat, aber weiterhin ungeachtet als das Geschlecht behandelt wird, was sie nur anatomisch ist. Es ist nämlich, als hätte man tatsächlich nichts gesagt - oder wahlweise mit einer Wand geredet.)
Ganz Berlin - hasst die Polizei?
2 May 2021 01:51 amGut, dann schaffen wir sie ab und ab morgen regiert der mit der größten Baseball-Keule den Straßenabschnitt vor seinem Haus! Oder irgendwer anders, der mehr Mittel und bessere Waffen hat!
Ihr schreit den lieben langen Tag auf eurer Demo den Polizisten die Ohren zu und bewerft sie dann noch mit Steinen und Flaschen, einfach so, weil ihr Bock darauf habt, wenn sie sich in ‘ner Traube notgedrungen zusammenziehen, und beschwert euch dann, warum sie auf eure “Verpisst euch!”-Rufe nicht endlich reagieren, danach grob gegen euch vorgehen?
Denkt mal ‘ne Runde nach, was ihr denen zumutet!
Wie würde es euch gehen, wenn um euch herum verschiedene johlende und skandierenden Gruppen stehen, und auf euch die Wurfgeschosse fliegen?! Ob Schutzausrüstung oder nicht, ihr würdet freiwillig anfangen zu beten, dass ihr bei dieser abgebrühten Scheiße keinen ernsthaften Schaden erleidet! Dass euch eine Bierflasche nicht doch mal an der falschen Stelle trefft und ihr danach im Krankenhaus als Tomate wieder aufwacht, bei der eure Familie nur noch den Stecker ziehen kann, weil ihr nie wieder gesund werdet!
Habt ihr schon mal in einer Situation dagestanden, euch umzingelt gesehen und es mit der Todesangst zu tun gekriegt, weil sie um euch herum außer Kontrolle zu geraten droht?!
Eure Agenda von “Bullen sind scheiße” und “Polizisten sind keine Menschen, sie sind wie Robocop” passt sehr gut zusammen mit den Bestrebungen der Klasse, die euch bis zum Sankt-Nimmerleins-Tag zu Niedriglöhnen ausbeuten will - wisst ihr das?!
Ihr steht für die Einführung einer Herrschaft der Willkür - jeder, der eine Waffe hat, regelt ab jetzt seine Angelegenheiten allein, wie ein Raubtier. Und der, der am meisten Waffen hat, kontrolliert die Straßen, herrscht nach seinem Gutdünken, verprügelt und tötet Leute, stiehlt und macht Sachen kaputt, weil es ihm gefällt.
Das soll eure Form einer “besseren Welt” sein?! So soll es aussehen?!
Man merkt nur eines - ihr habt nicht den geringsten Schimmer davon, wie man regiert, wie man Sicherheit schafft, wie man eine Umgebung schafft, in der niemand Angst haben muss, wenn er vor die Tür geht. Alles, was ihr könnt, ist zerstören und die Ordnung anderer Scheiße finden, weil sie euch Grenzen setzt!
Der Mensch ist nicht vom Baum heruntergeklettert, nur um weiterhin unter der Bedrohung von Raubtieren zu leben! Deswegen gibt es Militär, deswegen gibt es Polizei, auch Rechtsanwälte und Richter!
Wenn ihr ohne all das leben wollt, sucht euch bitte eine unbewohnte Insel, zieht einen riesengroßen Zaun darum und lasst die Welt in Ruhe! Geht euch ruhig dann abgeschirmt gegenseitig an die Gurgel, damit der Rest gut ohne euch und euer Chaos und eure Gewalt leben kann!!
Ihr schreit den lieben langen Tag auf eurer Demo den Polizisten die Ohren zu und bewerft sie dann noch mit Steinen und Flaschen, einfach so, weil ihr Bock darauf habt, wenn sie sich in ‘ner Traube notgedrungen zusammenziehen, und beschwert euch dann, warum sie auf eure “Verpisst euch!”-Rufe nicht endlich reagieren, danach grob gegen euch vorgehen?
Denkt mal ‘ne Runde nach, was ihr denen zumutet!
Wie würde es euch gehen, wenn um euch herum verschiedene johlende und skandierenden Gruppen stehen, und auf euch die Wurfgeschosse fliegen?! Ob Schutzausrüstung oder nicht, ihr würdet freiwillig anfangen zu beten, dass ihr bei dieser abgebrühten Scheiße keinen ernsthaften Schaden erleidet! Dass euch eine Bierflasche nicht doch mal an der falschen Stelle trefft und ihr danach im Krankenhaus als Tomate wieder aufwacht, bei der eure Familie nur noch den Stecker ziehen kann, weil ihr nie wieder gesund werdet!
Habt ihr schon mal in einer Situation dagestanden, euch umzingelt gesehen und es mit der Todesangst zu tun gekriegt, weil sie um euch herum außer Kontrolle zu geraten droht?!
Eure Agenda von “Bullen sind scheiße” und “Polizisten sind keine Menschen, sie sind wie Robocop” passt sehr gut zusammen mit den Bestrebungen der Klasse, die euch bis zum Sankt-Nimmerleins-Tag zu Niedriglöhnen ausbeuten will - wisst ihr das?!
Ihr steht für die Einführung einer Herrschaft der Willkür - jeder, der eine Waffe hat, regelt ab jetzt seine Angelegenheiten allein, wie ein Raubtier. Und der, der am meisten Waffen hat, kontrolliert die Straßen, herrscht nach seinem Gutdünken, verprügelt und tötet Leute, stiehlt und macht Sachen kaputt, weil es ihm gefällt.
Das soll eure Form einer “besseren Welt” sein?! So soll es aussehen?!
Man merkt nur eines - ihr habt nicht den geringsten Schimmer davon, wie man regiert, wie man Sicherheit schafft, wie man eine Umgebung schafft, in der niemand Angst haben muss, wenn er vor die Tür geht. Alles, was ihr könnt, ist zerstören und die Ordnung anderer Scheiße finden, weil sie euch Grenzen setzt!
Der Mensch ist nicht vom Baum heruntergeklettert, nur um weiterhin unter der Bedrohung von Raubtieren zu leben! Deswegen gibt es Militär, deswegen gibt es Polizei, auch Rechtsanwälte und Richter!
Wenn ihr ohne all das leben wollt, sucht euch bitte eine unbewohnte Insel, zieht einen riesengroßen Zaun darum und lasst die Welt in Ruhe! Geht euch ruhig dann abgeschirmt gegenseitig an die Gurgel, damit der Rest gut ohne euch und euer Chaos und eure Gewalt leben kann!!
Children understand if a protection system works to their advantage against adults.
Those who grow up in misery learn to not turn to them or that they won’t be believed anyway.
But those who grow up in ordinary circumstances - they develop understanding as well as will to make that useable for them in their favor. They can downright turn into Eric Cartman from South Park and try to enforce getting his Xbox back when their mother has taken it from them in order for justified scolding, staging it like a critical “violation of human rights”.
Kids like that tend to never grow up and not learn to respect boundaries.
Their whole world keeps spinning around their single ego.
Those who grow up in misery learn to not turn to them or that they won’t be believed anyway.
But those who grow up in ordinary circumstances - they develop understanding as well as will to make that useable for them in their favor. They can downright turn into Eric Cartman from South Park and try to enforce getting his Xbox back when their mother has taken it from them in order for justified scolding, staging it like a critical “violation of human rights”.
Kids like that tend to never grow up and not learn to respect boundaries.
Their whole world keeps spinning around their single ego.
Actually, the charge of the Capitol is just the tip of the ice berg of a development that's been going on for longer in the United States.
It's an event displaying the deep split within the US society and its political system, as well it's an expression of two very sharply opposing forces which both firmly believe to have found the Holy Grail and be on a mission from the Lord itself, while they're just both streams trying to force their understanding of how the world works upon the rest of the society governed by them.
In other words, to the people lesser educated about the US: Intersectionality is just radical racism and sexism through the backdoor, it doesn't change anything, and violent anti-racist protests and arbitrary juristic accusations against whoever is in the wrong place at the wrong time aren't going to fix your country (neither they bake you a loaf of bread) - just like a drifting back to nostalgia, glorifying golden economic ages which are no more, displaying one's guns in public all the time, disregarding the rules what one's country is made of and governed by, believing in bullshit theories about getting younger and 150 years old through the blood of children, stepping on the lesser financially fortunate and steadily disputing over if the poor deserve to get any handouts like social benefits and a general health insurance (because they're supposedly "of no use to anyone") isn't going to make anything turn to the better.
Each side needs to take a step back from their replacement religion and recognize it for what it is: Something that only takes places in their heads. Imagination.
And then take a precise pragmatic look at what the problems are - facts, not faith.
(It isn't called "theory" for nothing... "Theory" means "explanation pattern lacking scientific proof for it".)
In the case of US society drifting apart and being shortly before fighting each other physically, all supporters of both fractions can take a good look at themselves, if they search someone to blame.
It's your fault altogether!
Just so you heard it for once...
It's an event displaying the deep split within the US society and its political system, as well it's an expression of two very sharply opposing forces which both firmly believe to have found the Holy Grail and be on a mission from the Lord itself, while they're just both streams trying to force their understanding of how the world works upon the rest of the society governed by them.
In other words, to the people lesser educated about the US: Intersectionality is just radical racism and sexism through the backdoor, it doesn't change anything, and violent anti-racist protests and arbitrary juristic accusations against whoever is in the wrong place at the wrong time aren't going to fix your country (neither they bake you a loaf of bread) - just like a drifting back to nostalgia, glorifying golden economic ages which are no more, displaying one's guns in public all the time, disregarding the rules what one's country is made of and governed by, believing in bullshit theories about getting younger and 150 years old through the blood of children, stepping on the lesser financially fortunate and steadily disputing over if the poor deserve to get any handouts like social benefits and a general health insurance (because they're supposedly "of no use to anyone") isn't going to make anything turn to the better.
Each side needs to take a step back from their replacement religion and recognize it for what it is: Something that only takes places in their heads. Imagination.
And then take a precise pragmatic look at what the problems are - facts, not faith.
(It isn't called "theory" for nothing... "Theory" means "explanation pattern lacking scientific proof for it".)
In the case of US society drifting apart and being shortly before fighting each other physically, all supporters of both fractions can take a good look at themselves, if they search someone to blame.
It's your fault altogether!
Just so you heard it for once...
A smugly pharisaic cult that calls itself “progressive”, but which doesn’t have anything to do with the traditional left, and which even highly contradicts itself, so that it neither makes sense, nor does it firmly tell what it wants the world to turn into, goes viral during those years, trying to take over the public discourse and police everybody’s thoughts, everybody’s words, fill everybody’s sane feeling of “doing nothing wrong” arbitrarily with fear and shame of possibly doing the wrong with their every move (and that being the fault of their lives). It researches internet histories for just the smallest in violations of a mindset/ideology which barely anyone outside of its circles understands and supports.
They do that in order to be able to appeal to the mob to “hang the perpetrator higher”, much less like leftists, but more like just ordinary egomaniacs whose world circulates entirely around themselves and which can’t let anybody live anything else that they don’t understand or approve.
Meanwhile, even former allies don’t seem safe from that self-righteous method, once they take a single stance which the “cult” mob disapproves. Everything that they don’t agree with becomes a fatal lashing out against everyone to ruin their lives because they deem it “legitimate” to do so.
This... isn’t leftist. It’s the classic strategy from the right to ban everything they don’t approve. To cleanse the world from material, ideas and thought which they arbitrarily deem “a sin” out of whatever conservative or religious mindset. Or out of fear from anything which can become dangerous to their power inside the political system.
This isn’t even progressive ‘cause it downright paralyzes progress. You can see it its effects: People shut their mouths or censor their own speech in advance in order to not become victim of the all-destroying lash that outlaws you and calls for making your life miserable as long as you live (calling straight down for your suicide would be illegal), necessary debates disappear from the screen, unpopular as well as factually wrong or controversial stances move to the underground and develop themselves further in the darkness where barely anyone gets to know how their stories continue, people shy away from making public speeches or actually enter practicing an activity in the public and the public culture turns into a one-sided mash of monoculture which doesn’t reflect peoples’ everyday life nor the reality overall.
That is the very nature of what one knows from dogmatic theocracies as well as totalitarian dictatorships - only this time, there’s a different bunch of people sitting in the seats who command it. Not old white heterosexual men, but old and young, heterosexual as well as homo- and bisexual, binary and nonbinary, gender-reaffirmed as well as cis, black, brown and white men, women and neutrois. Who, instead of working with the gun and the threat of physical execution, work with brutal shaming and outlawing, leaving it either to the victim itself to beat itself up over its “misbehavior” or to someone unassociated and anonymous who wants to to carry out the dirty work, letting it appear like an accident, an overshoot or something else which they can’t be held responsible for because that “was an individual’s decision we disassociate from”.
They do that in order to be able to appeal to the mob to “hang the perpetrator higher”, much less like leftists, but more like just ordinary egomaniacs whose world circulates entirely around themselves and which can’t let anybody live anything else that they don’t understand or approve.
Meanwhile, even former allies don’t seem safe from that self-righteous method, once they take a single stance which the “cult” mob disapproves. Everything that they don’t agree with becomes a fatal lashing out against everyone to ruin their lives because they deem it “legitimate” to do so.
This... isn’t leftist. It’s the classic strategy from the right to ban everything they don’t approve. To cleanse the world from material, ideas and thought which they arbitrarily deem “a sin” out of whatever conservative or religious mindset. Or out of fear from anything which can become dangerous to their power inside the political system.
This isn’t even progressive ‘cause it downright paralyzes progress. You can see it its effects: People shut their mouths or censor their own speech in advance in order to not become victim of the all-destroying lash that outlaws you and calls for making your life miserable as long as you live (calling straight down for your suicide would be illegal), necessary debates disappear from the screen, unpopular as well as factually wrong or controversial stances move to the underground and develop themselves further in the darkness where barely anyone gets to know how their stories continue, people shy away from making public speeches or actually enter practicing an activity in the public and the public culture turns into a one-sided mash of monoculture which doesn’t reflect peoples’ everyday life nor the reality overall.
That is the very nature of what one knows from dogmatic theocracies as well as totalitarian dictatorships - only this time, there’s a different bunch of people sitting in the seats who command it. Not old white heterosexual men, but old and young, heterosexual as well as homo- and bisexual, binary and nonbinary, gender-reaffirmed as well as cis, black, brown and white men, women and neutrois. Who, instead of working with the gun and the threat of physical execution, work with brutal shaming and outlawing, leaving it either to the victim itself to beat itself up over its “misbehavior” or to someone unassociated and anonymous who wants to to carry out the dirty work, letting it appear like an accident, an overshoot or something else which they can’t be held responsible for because that “was an individual’s decision we disassociate from”.
The one big mistake that Identity Politics (short: ID politics) and the principle of Intersectionality are based upon is: Them assume a group identity of people according to a certain body feature (e. g. skin color, sex, physical disability) or personality feature (e. g. religion, sexual orientation, nationality, cultural origin, political stance, mental handicaps), but which don’t exist in this collective manner as the two want to make believe. Even lesser if it comes to the judgment of moral and humanly virtuous behavior, for which the different valuations of identities of ID politics want to lay down the foundation of how somebody and his deeds should be rated.
Pick an example: Is it universally morally so okay to call out all white people as morally rotten, bad and potential evil-doers in areas where 99% of the whole population is just white-skinned? Isn’t that a big risky and morally-questionable supposition? If not to speak: Insulting?
Doing the same with another skin color easily “earns” you the attribute “racism” - because it simply is such. Judgment of people by their skin color (“giving names” is judging) and what myths your brain carries inside of it regarding that particular body feature.
Go on with the tightly-intertwined topics sexism/born sex/reassigned sex.
It’s a popular fashion these days to apply guilt for anything that goes wrong in this world to born males - because there is a small section of males who have significant political power and links to powerful political and economical offices (no matter who’s currently placed in the seat).
Would it be justified to tell the same “all men are trash”-agenda in an orphanage, in a problem school, in a drug rehab ward, in an anger management group or in an industrial facility where mostly males work? Where people (a remarkable share of males probably) are either because they got dumped by their parents, family and society, where they are in need of help, in need of psychical warmth, and admitted it, or brought there by society because they behavior was unendurable - or where they sacrifice a lot of their physical strength daily to produce gizmos for society?
Are these people responsible through the power of only their own will for how bad the world is?
Boys who were dumped, boys who were beaten, boys who flee into drugs and violence to forget?
Men who work their ass off and sacrifice their health for something that society makes use of later?
...Just always remember: They could also give no fucking damn about society and just be the violent, abusive and/or lazy schmocks which don’t contribute anything to the well-being of others, which cause other people only pain, and leave you standing there “Just do my job yourself, if you’re such a smart ass!”.
Putting all caring fathers, loyal workers and troubled boys and men who want to get out of their misery in the same pot with old greedy capitalist geezers which can’t do without superior power over a part of the earth and large amounts of money, with non-remorseful war criminals, rapists, child molesters, thugs, bullies and whatnot - just because they all share the same born sex and a dick -, is the same sexist argumentation chain that reduces women to the cliché of assumed cooking and cleaning abilities and their physical features such as tits, ass, pussy and the ability to bear children. The same sexist argumentation chain that brings you thought patterns like “I know you want it, baby! Don’t be so shy...”, “Grab them by the pussy”, “Women only want one thing - a man’s wallet” and “All women are bad - except for Mom and except for the hoes who shut up and take my dick into whatever orifice I want it to take her into”.
Another note about “sexual orientation” other than the heterosexual one.
Gays, bisexuals, lesbians, asexuals - they all can be intellectually dumb as a bucket of shrimp, be lazy good-for-nothings, intolerant towards people, be biased like a cliché, be assholes, be abusive, violent, ruthless, cowardly, they can refuse to take over responsibility for their wrongdoing and so on.
Their sexual orientation doesn’t automatically make them morally superior people. As one’s sexual preferences are something that you cannot pick at will (remember that?).
So why should that be an indicator for the quality of a person’s moral virtues?
Or a criterion to not criticize a person if it’s factually due?
Another significant delusion included in this assumption of a supposed “group identity” is that people who get sorted or sort themselves to these groups all harbor nearly the same wishes, hopes, feelings, needs, ambitions and thought patterns.
For real: Does every black person (“black” in the sense of an sub-Saharan African) on earth think the same? Does a wealthy black person in America necessarily mind “his black brothers and sisters” in the rest of the country and do something for them to increase their status within the system?
Do black people worldwide harmonize among each other and not lay a finger upon one other?
Body features and preferences don’t negate peoples bad or good character.
Actually, they don’t have much to do with it. They’re just tiny details of the whole person, nothing more.
Sorting people according to such features, which they mostly can’t be held accountable for as they couldn’t choose them at birth, not only does it tear society apart into groups which don’t exist, but also strengthen the assumption in “average” people that black and white are different on the whole, that non-heterosexuals are like aliens from another planet compared to heterosexuals. That one religion is more virtuous or meaningful than the other and they don’t do the same in praying to imaginary creatures which no human eye has seen until today and kill people over the belief that “their God is the right one”.
To be frank and outspoken: Identity Politics is about to tear down every little bit of the thought that human plebs has fought so hard for that all humans shall be treated equally, have equal rights and possibilities to participate and be punished equally for their wrongdoings.
Admittedly, mankind still did not make it to turn this ideal into a full-blown reality, but it seriously doesn’t get any better if you give up on the idea, citing it to be whatever kind of mistake to actually have wanted that because the wrong people wanted or fought for it.
(In fact, these people are long dead by now and ideals can be modified, so that they better suit the modern circumstances, which those long-dead people couldn’t take into account back then.)
According to that principle, no-one of the ID politics die-hard campaigners probably should use a smart phone, a computer, a car, electronic kitchen gadgets of whatever kind or even eat tofu (if they’re vegans).
Because all that either is produced with economic slavery these days or was invented by somebody who was racist, sexist, bigoted or biased in any way towards another specific type of humans which later turned out to be morally wrong and based on nothing but nonsensical belief.
Pick an example: Is it universally morally so okay to call out all white people as morally rotten, bad and potential evil-doers in areas where 99% of the whole population is just white-skinned? Isn’t that a big risky and morally-questionable supposition? If not to speak: Insulting?
Doing the same with another skin color easily “earns” you the attribute “racism” - because it simply is such. Judgment of people by their skin color (“giving names” is judging) and what myths your brain carries inside of it regarding that particular body feature.
Go on with the tightly-intertwined topics sexism/born sex/reassigned sex.
It’s a popular fashion these days to apply guilt for anything that goes wrong in this world to born males - because there is a small section of males who have significant political power and links to powerful political and economical offices (no matter who’s currently placed in the seat).
Would it be justified to tell the same “all men are trash”-agenda in an orphanage, in a problem school, in a drug rehab ward, in an anger management group or in an industrial facility where mostly males work? Where people (a remarkable share of males probably) are either because they got dumped by their parents, family and society, where they are in need of help, in need of psychical warmth, and admitted it, or brought there by society because they behavior was unendurable - or where they sacrifice a lot of their physical strength daily to produce gizmos for society?
Are these people responsible through the power of only their own will for how bad the world is?
Boys who were dumped, boys who were beaten, boys who flee into drugs and violence to forget?
Men who work their ass off and sacrifice their health for something that society makes use of later?
...Just always remember: They could also give no fucking damn about society and just be the violent, abusive and/or lazy schmocks which don’t contribute anything to the well-being of others, which cause other people only pain, and leave you standing there “Just do my job yourself, if you’re such a smart ass!”.
Putting all caring fathers, loyal workers and troubled boys and men who want to get out of their misery in the same pot with old greedy capitalist geezers which can’t do without superior power over a part of the earth and large amounts of money, with non-remorseful war criminals, rapists, child molesters, thugs, bullies and whatnot - just because they all share the same born sex and a dick -, is the same sexist argumentation chain that reduces women to the cliché of assumed cooking and cleaning abilities and their physical features such as tits, ass, pussy and the ability to bear children. The same sexist argumentation chain that brings you thought patterns like “I know you want it, baby! Don’t be so shy...”, “Grab them by the pussy”, “Women only want one thing - a man’s wallet” and “All women are bad - except for Mom and except for the hoes who shut up and take my dick into whatever orifice I want it to take her into”.
Another note about “sexual orientation” other than the heterosexual one.
Gays, bisexuals, lesbians, asexuals - they all can be intellectually dumb as a bucket of shrimp, be lazy good-for-nothings, intolerant towards people, be biased like a cliché, be assholes, be abusive, violent, ruthless, cowardly, they can refuse to take over responsibility for their wrongdoing and so on.
Their sexual orientation doesn’t automatically make them morally superior people. As one’s sexual preferences are something that you cannot pick at will (remember that?).
So why should that be an indicator for the quality of a person’s moral virtues?
Or a criterion to not criticize a person if it’s factually due?
Another significant delusion included in this assumption of a supposed “group identity” is that people who get sorted or sort themselves to these groups all harbor nearly the same wishes, hopes, feelings, needs, ambitions and thought patterns.
For real: Does every black person (“black” in the sense of an sub-Saharan African) on earth think the same? Does a wealthy black person in America necessarily mind “his black brothers and sisters” in the rest of the country and do something for them to increase their status within the system?
Do black people worldwide harmonize among each other and not lay a finger upon one other?
Body features and preferences don’t negate peoples bad or good character.
Actually, they don’t have much to do with it. They’re just tiny details of the whole person, nothing more.
Sorting people according to such features, which they mostly can’t be held accountable for as they couldn’t choose them at birth, not only does it tear society apart into groups which don’t exist, but also strengthen the assumption in “average” people that black and white are different on the whole, that non-heterosexuals are like aliens from another planet compared to heterosexuals. That one religion is more virtuous or meaningful than the other and they don’t do the same in praying to imaginary creatures which no human eye has seen until today and kill people over the belief that “their God is the right one”.
To be frank and outspoken: Identity Politics is about to tear down every little bit of the thought that human plebs has fought so hard for that all humans shall be treated equally, have equal rights and possibilities to participate and be punished equally for their wrongdoings.
Admittedly, mankind still did not make it to turn this ideal into a full-blown reality, but it seriously doesn’t get any better if you give up on the idea, citing it to be whatever kind of mistake to actually have wanted that because the wrong people wanted or fought for it.
(In fact, these people are long dead by now and ideals can be modified, so that they better suit the modern circumstances, which those long-dead people couldn’t take into account back then.)
According to that principle, no-one of the ID politics die-hard campaigners probably should use a smart phone, a computer, a car, electronic kitchen gadgets of whatever kind or even eat tofu (if they’re vegans).
Because all that either is produced with economic slavery these days or was invented by somebody who was racist, sexist, bigoted or biased in any way towards another specific type of humans which later turned out to be morally wrong and based on nothing but nonsensical belief.
The queer hardness-phobia
4 May 2020 11:02 am“So then, if you have a lot to criticize about LBGTQA+ culture, what is it then what you want instead? What do you want it instead to be like?”
“I want it to be a place that also offers space for hardness. That isn’t afraid of hardness. That constantly doesn’t harbor an obsession with femininity and mentally equates that with the softness that is supposed to be the general emotionality of the human soul. Who the heck has established that association anyway? Isn’t that copycatting “enemy propaganda” or some sort of that?
Also, it would be nice if people weren’t constantly reduced to their sexual orientation or their preferences, but to the personalities they are. Even LBGTQA+ people can be assholes, can be criminals and bitchy creatures, committing morally bad behavior and being personally uneasy to deal with.
LBGTQA+ people also ought not to follow only a certain set of politics that seems like “endorsable” in their situation by outsiders or scene-insiders. For example: What is with those who enjoy their time spending it with guns, spending it in a uniform or a fighting suit, studying the arts of battle? Instead of making a fuss about playing with their genitals? Are they no less part of the group or doesn’t it just not suit a cliché about LBGTQA+ that LBGTQA+ has about itself?
Give those ones a place inside your scene and a steady public representation, so that people who have those preferences don’t feel as excluded and alien as they do now. You have hidden way too long behind your shield of sex and “stand by your sensitive side”! It’s a matter of fact that some people just don’t have that interest so much or that sensitive side inside their personality, or they don’t show it to others in that way which you’d regard as your understanding of “liberated”. They’re just that personality that they are and besides they’re LBGTQA+.”
“I want it to be a place that also offers space for hardness. That isn’t afraid of hardness. That constantly doesn’t harbor an obsession with femininity and mentally equates that with the softness that is supposed to be the general emotionality of the human soul. Who the heck has established that association anyway? Isn’t that copycatting “enemy propaganda” or some sort of that?
Also, it would be nice if people weren’t constantly reduced to their sexual orientation or their preferences, but to the personalities they are. Even LBGTQA+ people can be assholes, can be criminals and bitchy creatures, committing morally bad behavior and being personally uneasy to deal with.
LBGTQA+ people also ought not to follow only a certain set of politics that seems like “endorsable” in their situation by outsiders or scene-insiders. For example: What is with those who enjoy their time spending it with guns, spending it in a uniform or a fighting suit, studying the arts of battle? Instead of making a fuss about playing with their genitals? Are they no less part of the group or doesn’t it just not suit a cliché about LBGTQA+ that LBGTQA+ has about itself?
Give those ones a place inside your scene and a steady public representation, so that people who have those preferences don’t feel as excluded and alien as they do now. You have hidden way too long behind your shield of sex and “stand by your sensitive side”! It’s a matter of fact that some people just don’t have that interest so much or that sensitive side inside their personality, or they don’t show it to others in that way which you’d regard as your understanding of “liberated”. They’re just that personality that they are and besides they’re LBGTQA+.”
About hatred
8 January 2020 04:20 pm“Let me tell you something about hate.
If you let it become the golden thread of your life - if you let it take control of you and occupy every corner of your mind, then you’ll get blind to what life has else to offer. There will be no sense left inside of you that knows joy, that knows tears, sadness, relaxation or empathy for anyone. Additionally, everyone around you who doesn’t agree with your stance, you’ll regard them as just another enemy. - Expendable and unworthy of even just breathing.
You gonna be the slave to your hate, serving it like a dark Draconian lord - executing his will blindfold, never questioning his motivations and never questioning the legitimation of his judgment.
Therefore, beware of getting drawn into this dark hole! Untameable wrath coupled with resentment has the power to make you become willing to sacrifice yourself for shit and the life of innocent people - to commit quasi-religious hocus pocus blood-sacrifices just for the sake of a bubble that only exists in your own head and that only matters to you in regard of the course of the world.
In other words: You can hate something as much as you want, still it’s not gonna matter to more than just a few folks at most and guaranteed it’s not gonna make the earth stop spinning. You’re trapped in your own cosmos and you’re still stuck with your personal insignificance to the rest of all existence.”
If you let it become the golden thread of your life - if you let it take control of you and occupy every corner of your mind, then you’ll get blind to what life has else to offer. There will be no sense left inside of you that knows joy, that knows tears, sadness, relaxation or empathy for anyone. Additionally, everyone around you who doesn’t agree with your stance, you’ll regard them as just another enemy. - Expendable and unworthy of even just breathing.
You gonna be the slave to your hate, serving it like a dark Draconian lord - executing his will blindfold, never questioning his motivations and never questioning the legitimation of his judgment.
Therefore, beware of getting drawn into this dark hole! Untameable wrath coupled with resentment has the power to make you become willing to sacrifice yourself for shit and the life of innocent people - to commit quasi-religious hocus pocus blood-sacrifices just for the sake of a bubble that only exists in your own head and that only matters to you in regard of the course of the world.
In other words: You can hate something as much as you want, still it’s not gonna matter to more than just a few folks at most and guaranteed it’s not gonna make the earth stop spinning. You’re trapped in your own cosmos and you’re still stuck with your personal insignificance to the rest of all existence.”
Turbulences, tribal patterns - modern man goes on and on to grow back to believe kin and family more than facts and events before its eye.
Lots of dirty laundry surfaces, gets used to execute the will of a few which refuse to let go of power - as well as to leave the previous path. Not even for the purpose of surviving or going on living well...
Smart mind better withdraws from this turmoil, and starts picking up the remaining pieces when everybody else has died from their foolish clash.
Lots of dirty laundry surfaces, gets used to execute the will of a few which refuse to let go of power - as well as to leave the previous path. Not even for the purpose of surviving or going on living well...
Smart mind better withdraws from this turmoil, and starts picking up the remaining pieces when everybody else has died from their foolish clash.
Partners, not enemies
5 November 2019 10:33 amPerhaps a controversial thing to say these days, regarding all the abuse of power and one’s position that takes place, but it should be noted unconditionally:
Be solidary with your cops which are fair to the people, which behave competent and try to help as best as they can - which take their job serious.
Don’t go blanket down on them and beat them up. They’re people too, they have families too.
They also get exploited of their time and health by being employed in too small numbers and getting called to guard a demonstration or a soccer game every few weekends, much too often than is good for them and their lives, never making it to take their time off for the overtime they worked throughout the year.
So... as long as you’re not facing an individual which tries to achieve his promotion through you, or which intentionally behaves like an asshole to you, be kind to them and don’t blame them for failures and errors which actually politicians are responsible for.
In case of need or danger, rather regard them as your potential allies - as people to work together with to make the good things happen.
Be solidary with your cops which are fair to the people, which behave competent and try to help as best as they can - which take their job serious.
Don’t go blanket down on them and beat them up. They’re people too, they have families too.
They also get exploited of their time and health by being employed in too small numbers and getting called to guard a demonstration or a soccer game every few weekends, much too often than is good for them and their lives, never making it to take their time off for the overtime they worked throughout the year.
So... as long as you’re not facing an individual which tries to achieve his promotion through you, or which intentionally behaves like an asshole to you, be kind to them and don’t blame them for failures and errors which actually politicians are responsible for.
In case of need or danger, rather regard them as your potential allies - as people to work together with to make the good things happen.
Down at the altar of life, you raise your head to the sky and wonder: What is all this worth? What is all this fighting for worth? Why do you resist? Why don’t you give up your special interests and just lock your head and be total average? Why don’t you become afraid of the same things like everybody else? Why don’t you listen to the same mainstream sources and let them tell you what is right and what is wrong? What makes it so hard for you to just marry, reproduce, hold down a job and simply consume?
What is the thrill that you get from rejecting all this?
Quietly, powerless, submissive, tired and exhausted, the answer sounds: "Because the life that the nymph promised always was the more auspicious and more intensive one."
What is the thrill that you get from rejecting all this?
Quietly, powerless, submissive, tired and exhausted, the answer sounds: "Because the life that the nymph promised always was the more auspicious and more intensive one."
The peace society
7 October 2019 12:21 pmA strong disadvantage of long-lasting peace is that, should anything happen which makes this come to an end, barely anybody knows how to fight and drive back the forces who've broke it. Peace has become a divine-given daily self-evidence - and the loss of it marks a huge trauma.
Not just that humans have no mental resources to handle and process that - they'll also be run over by the first and even most ill-equipped gang that comes along the way.
Not just that humans have no mental resources to handle and process that - they'll also be run over by the first and even most ill-equipped gang that comes along the way.
Emanzipation of fighting
10 September 2019 12:33 pmTo link "going to war" with "dying for one’s country" is so much last century thinking...
You don’t need to get down onto such abstract emotional bullshit to find a reason to fight actively.
Better think of it as "I don’t care about the flag I go to war for, they gonna lie to me anyway - I fight so that me, my loved ones and my neighbor can go on living in peace".
You don’t need to get down onto such abstract emotional bullshit to find a reason to fight actively.
Better think of it as "I don’t care about the flag I go to war for, they gonna lie to me anyway - I fight so that me, my loved ones and my neighbor can go on living in peace".
As protests in Hong Kong became a steady topic in Western media in the recent weeks again:
Let's propose a critical question - what do the protesters actually aim for? Why do they fight China's taking-over of the territory?
All of that what they criticize to happen from China's side of things has been formally recorded in a couple of documents made long time ago between the British government and the PRC as part of returning Hong Kong to China which it once was taken from by them as a colony.
So, with fighting that, who do the protesters think will maintain their province instead and make the laws for it if China's reign is not desired?
So this can only mean targeting a return under the British crown.
Think about it...
People fighting for staying a colony!
Of course they won't mention this in your allegedly peace-, freedom- and democracy-loving Western media - as it's like a recently-created new form of sport to shoot darts at China whenever a possibility shows up to do so (especially for America under Trump).
Talking about a former colony actually wanting to stay a colony (judging by the deeds of the activists on the streets), this would be a very strange topic to report about with a subtle psychological undertone of joy.
Let's propose a critical question - what do the protesters actually aim for? Why do they fight China's taking-over of the territory?
All of that what they criticize to happen from China's side of things has been formally recorded in a couple of documents made long time ago between the British government and the PRC as part of returning Hong Kong to China which it once was taken from by them as a colony.
So, with fighting that, who do the protesters think will maintain their province instead and make the laws for it if China's reign is not desired?
So this can only mean targeting a return under the British crown.
Think about it...
People fighting for staying a colony!
Of course they won't mention this in your allegedly peace-, freedom- and democracy-loving Western media - as it's like a recently-created new form of sport to shoot darts at China whenever a possibility shows up to do so (especially for America under Trump).
Talking about a former colony actually wanting to stay a colony (judging by the deeds of the activists on the streets), this would be a very strange topic to report about with a subtle psychological undertone of joy.
Return to the gulf
24 June 2019 03:03 pmThe new campaign against Iran kind of leaves the impression like there's an unconditional need for the US to finally win a conflict again and push their interests through (after the several failed military campaigns, economic war attempts and coups d'état). Maybe even - or only - to achieve a second term for a president called Trump.
Erinnerung
11 March 2019 12:00 pmOriginally posted by ![[dreamwidth.org profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
matrixmann at Erinnerung
2009, Winnenden, Baden-Württemberg: A 17-year-old student takes a Baretta pistol from his Dad’s possession and kills 13 people at his former school, 2 more and himself on escaping the scene to a psychiatric clinic and eventually a car dealer.
What this case maintains memory with is an opposite to „good police work“ - a SWAT team having surrounded the school couldn’t prevent an 17-year-old from escaping through the backdoor and capturing a random car on the street, including a driver, to continue his killing spree.
matrixmann at Erinnerung2011: An earthquake with the magnitude of 9.0 appears under water not far from the coast of Japan.
First the quake itself devastates the area, but more importantly it triggers a tsunami wave which adds on top of this.
A nearby nuclear power plant in Fukushima was affected heavily by both and, due to human arrogance and greed that made it be constructed suitable to economical needs, but not appropriate to the needs of a facility that stands on a cliff coast of a volcanic island, a meltdown appeared during the following days.
400.000 people in estimated numbers had to leave their homes and be evacuated in the zone set by the state around the power plant.
The state of Japan, being located where it is, hung on a thing thread depending on the outcome of the acute actions made to meet this disaster.
Still until this very day, the consequences out of this event keep the authorities busy.
First the quake itself devastates the area, but more importantly it triggers a tsunami wave which adds on top of this.
A nearby nuclear power plant in Fukushima was affected heavily by both and, due to human arrogance and greed that made it be constructed suitable to economical needs, but not appropriate to the needs of a facility that stands on a cliff coast of a volcanic island, a meltdown appeared during the following days.
400.000 people in estimated numbers had to leave their homes and be evacuated in the zone set by the state around the power plant.
The state of Japan, being located where it is, hung on a thing thread depending on the outcome of the acute actions made to meet this disaster.
Still until this very day, the consequences out of this event keep the authorities busy.
2009, Winnenden, Baden-Württemberg: A 17-year-old student takes a Baretta pistol from his Dad’s possession and kills 13 people at his former school, 2 more and himself on escaping the scene to a psychiatric clinic and eventually a car dealer.
What this case maintains memory with is an opposite to „good police work“ - a SWAT team having surrounded the school couldn’t prevent an 17-year-old from escaping through the backdoor and capturing a random car on the street, including a driver, to continue his killing spree.
Habit breaks the free will
12 February 2019 12:03 amYou know why people accept precarious and even slave-like working conditions/conditions for existing without fighting back or trying to change them?
It's because they're so used to it, they don't even habor the glimpse of an idea that it could be any different than how they experience it in the present.
They've accepted the idea "That's what work for money is like, isn't it?".
Just like a victim of repeated violence, which accepts its fate at some point and comes to believe "This is what life seems to be like... Why do I resist?".
It's because they're so used to it, they don't even habor the glimpse of an idea that it could be any different than how they experience it in the present.
They've accepted the idea "That's what work for money is like, isn't it?".
Just like a victim of repeated violence, which accepts its fate at some point and comes to believe "This is what life seems to be like... Why do I resist?".
